221–230 of 341 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Right now, zero. They didn't say when it was rolling out or what percentage they would share. It might be something like 10%. Lol.
I will make a bot that makes GPTs, and a bot that makes other bots that make GPTs
Earlier quoted context omitted.
And seeing how OpenAI is moving up the value chain, what's the guarantee they won't come up with an in-house competitor to the bot that was built on their platform?
Guarantee? That's one of the most important aspects of bothering to build out a platform: eat the ecosystem to add incremental value to the platform, bolster the moat. The guarantee is that they will clone and extinguish most of the best bots/tools/services riding on top of GPT. It's what platforms overwhelmingly tend to do. If your thing is a near-touch to GPT, depends on it, is of medium complexity or lower, and is…
The pattern will continue until no one needs anything. I am sure this company will eat everything. There will be no pie.
This makes me think that open source models are the future, for other reasons as well. No company is going to give them OpenAI their data to make bots, regardless if they won't train on the data. So what OpenAI can do at the moment is to focus on everyday user, and see where the biggest use cases are.
Furthermore, as Sam alluded to, this confirms to me that multi-LLM architectures (AutoGen, AutoGPT, BabyAGI etc) is the future. It´s about pushing the ways in which we can use these models, i.e. using different architectures because it will be a while before we get into more powerful models. These is simply no compute for it at the moment. The dust has yet to settle.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
OpenAI in a weird way has mediocre marketing. The examples they use for Dalle-3 are way worse than the average ones I see people cooking up on Twitter/Reddit. They only seem to demo the most vaguely generic implementations of their app. Even their DevDay logo is just 4 lines of text.
Just the fact that they decided to stay with what is essentially a highly technical acronym i.e. GPT, as their major product line says a lot.
Plus, "generative pre-trained transformer" sounds futuristic, which seems like a fitting brand image for OpenAI.
Their zappier demo was uninspiring. They are trying to appeal to the mainstream (non devs) users when their actual value is the API. Everyday users don´t have access to propriatery data that makes the LLM Bots valuable. This makes me think that open source models are the future, for other reasons as well. No company is going to give them OpenAI their data to make bots, regardless if they won't train on the data. So w…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah none of them ever did, and that was always very obvious. If you can make it by wrapping a few API calls, you have no moat and anyone can steal your idea/customers.
First-mover advantage can be powerful. If you can build a community around your wrapper quickly then you can leverage that community to build a moat.
It doesn't seem to be much smarter than a simple "tell me how I should interpret inputs from the user."
Earlier quoted context omitted.
OpenAI is a sane company. They do rollouts for new features.
No, they just lie in their marketing > Example GPTs are available today for ChatGPT Plus or > Starting today, no more hopping between models; everything you need is in one place. Neither of which are true. I'm a paying user and I have access to neither. They do this _all the time_. They announce something "available immediately" and it trickles out a week or more later. If they want to do gradual rollouts (which is s…