Live data from Hacker News

Ivan Illich’s radical critique of modern certitudes (2021)

noemamag.com

121–130 of 183 posts

Re: Ivan Illich’s radical critique of modern certitudes (2021)

#121
post #119
post #75

Criticizing modern medicine makes a lot of sense if you're a devout Catholic because the afterlife tempers the sadness of death. For non-believers, though, earthly life is all there is, so reducing suffering, disease, and poverty are much more pressing goals -- goals that might be worth a little alienation. I would emphasize choice: people can (and do) embrace alternative ways of life, from the Amish to kibbutzim. Si…

> Criticizing modern medicine makes a lot of sense if you're a devout Catholic because the afterlife tempers the sadness of death > Similarly, we don't have to drag out our final years: we're free to opt out of medical treatments OTOH, Catholicism also is strongly against euthanasia, which is arguably at odds with the sentiment of not having to drag out final years. I think there's plenty of room for a philosophy to…

It isn't at odds, since in both cases (euthanasia and medically-prolonged end-of-life), it is the human person that is trying to control the ultimate outcome of life. The Catholic approach is to say "let God decide".

Re: Ivan Illich’s radical critique of modern certitudes (2021)

#122
post #19

Related. Others? Silence Is a Commons (1983) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28431541 - Sept 2021 (17 comments) Silence Is a Commons (1983) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26007100 - Feb 2021 (31 comments) Deschooling Society (1970) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23821855 - July 2020 (195 comments) Deschooling Society - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21578620 - Nov 2019 (1 comment) Tools f…

Thank you for taking the time and effort to produce these summaries. The comments on HN are such a useful resource, often exceeding the value of the cited sources!

Indeed. Thank you.

HN is a bit like the Whole Earth Catalogue’s “Access to Tools” section.

Curated, [gravity-powered][1] links are the Access to Tools article.

Ranked comments are the books related to the article displayed on the sidebar.

[1]: https://cs229.stanford.edu/proj2011/Learning_to_identify.pdf

Re: Ivan Illich’s radical critique of modern certitudes (2021)

#123
The computer scientist Stephen Kell has made an Illich-like critique of computing and software development practices. I recall Kell mentions that he ran across Illich's work after beginning the critique but was struck by the similarities:

Software Against Humanity? An Illichian perspective on the industrial era of software https://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/srk21/research/talks/...

De-Escalating Software https://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/srk21/research/talks/...

The software developer Kartik Agaram cites Illich's 'Tools for Conviviality' as an influence on his Mu system:

http://akkartik.name/akkartik-convivial-20200607.pdf

Re: Ivan Illich’s radical critique of modern certitudes (2021)

#124
post #121
post #119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Criticizing modern medicine makes a lot of sense if you're a devout Catholic because the afterlife tempers the sadness of death > Similarly, we don't have to drag out our final years: we're free to opt out of medical treatments OTOH, Catholicism also is strongly against euthanasia, which is arguably at odds with the sentiment of not having to drag out final years. I think there's plenty of room for a philosophy to…

It isn't at odds, since in both cases (euthanasia and medically-prolonged end-of-life), it is the human person that is trying to control the ultimate outcome of life. The Catholic approach is to say "let God decide".

I guess to me it sounds like it's at best orthogonal to the idea of dragging out life; sometimes it drags out longer than it might otherwise have to, sometimes it ends much earlier than it would otherwise have to. I think my confusion was over mentioning "opt out of medical treatments" right after "we don't have to drag out life" in a way that sounded to me like it was calling them equivalent, and from my perspective, sometimes forgoing medical treatments can itself drag life out longer than someone might want.

Ultimately it sounds like we mostly agree that people can make personal decisions for themselves about their medical care; I just found the way you described it above fairly confusing.

(edit: I apparently missed that the response was from a different person than I originally responded to)

Re: Ivan Illich’s radical critique of modern certitudes (2021)

#125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thank you for taking the time and effort to produce these summaries. The comments on HN are such a useful resource, often exceeding the value of the cited sources!

Indeed. Thank you. HN is a bit like the Whole Earth Catalogue’s “Access to Tools” section. Curated, [gravity-powered][1] links are the Access to Tools article. Ranked comments are the books related to the article displayed on the sidebar. [1]: https://cs229.stanford.edu/proj2011/Learning_to_identify.pdf

Illich was on the cover of the winter 1983 CoEvolution Quarterly. Definitely a kindred spirit.

https://just.thinkofit.com/ivan-illich-silence-is-a-commons/

Re: Ivan Illich’s radical critique of modern certitudes (2021)

#127
post #107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>I would contest the notion that a lack of religiosity must magnify discontent with death It’s the other way around. Lack of religiosity is the default state and with it you get the default discontent with death, but a religion with an afterlife could reduce discontent with death.

> Lack of religiosity is the default state On the contrary: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_irreligio... > and with it you get the default discontent with death That is a huge assumption. There is a huge variety of ways in which societies, cultures and individuals relate and have related with death.

Popular or widespread doesn't mean it’s default. Religion is part of culture and that’s something that’s passed down person to person. A blank culture or no culture has no religion. Tabula rasa.

I’m not assuming anything, I’m not pegging the default discontent with death to a particular value, I don’t know what it is and it’s irrelevant. I’m just saying the some religions, with certain concepts of afterlife, like catholicism, would reduce that discontent.

Re: Ivan Illich’s radical critique of modern certitudes (2021)

#128
post #75

Criticizing modern medicine makes a lot of sense if you're a devout Catholic because the afterlife tempers the sadness of death. For non-believers, though, earthly life is all there is, so reducing suffering, disease, and poverty are much more pressing goals -- goals that might be worth a little alienation. I would emphasize choice: people can (and do) embrace alternative ways of life, from the Amish to kibbutzim. Si…

[dead]

Re: Ivan Illich’s radical critique of modern certitudes (2021)

#129

> *But he was blistering in his critique of our medical systems oriented toward postponing the end as long as possible. “We now see that a majority of these medical achievements are deceptive misnomers, actually prolonging the suffering of madmen, cripples, old fools and monsters,” he wrote.* That one has certainly proved prescient. Medical science has gotten frighteningly good at prolonging life even in cases when i…

Here in the US and many other first world countries the population is getting very old. We'll need to bring in younger people who look different to keep the average age down. This obviously has all sorts of side effects. The other problem is the wealth inequality it creates. Wealth compounds with time plus the older generation grew up in a boom period. Add in the fact that they were able to buy cheap housing which ha…

[dead]

Re: Ivan Illich’s radical critique of modern certitudes (2021)

#130
post #75

Criticizing modern medicine makes a lot of sense if you're a devout Catholic because the afterlife tempers the sadness of death. For non-believers, though, earthly life is all there is, so reducing suffering, disease, and poverty are much more pressing goals -- goals that might be worth a little alienation. I would emphasize choice: people can (and do) embrace alternative ways of life, from the Amish to kibbutzim. Si…

> You can also opt out of modernity in smaller ways, decisions like not owning a car, not watching TV, and so on.

Sure, if you reduce the effects of "modernity" to only your own ability to consume goods and services. One cannot "opt out" of the degeneration of social will, or the increasing demand for control over each part of our lives by unaccountable bureaucracies.

Post reply on HN