I2P: End-to-end encrypted and anonymous internet
21–30 of 124 posts
Re: I2P: End-to-end encrypted and anonymous internet
#22Re: I2P: End-to-end encrypted and anonymous internet
#23I really like I2P as a project, and I think it gets a lot of things right. For example having every network participant relay some internal traffic, instead of relying on altruism from relay operators, makes it much harder for a single entity to control enough hops to deanonymize users. Sadly, outside of torrenting I2P doesn't seem to have much traction, losing out to the better funded tor project
Does I2P torrenting operate at remotely comparable speeds to without? I recall hearing that it was vaguely frowned upon with Tor back in the day for saturating the networ and it didn't seem like there was much reason to use it over basically any VPN, especially speed wise, assuming your motive was to avoid copyright notices.
Re: I2P: End-to-end encrypted and anonymous internet
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does I2P torrenting operate at remotely comparable speeds to without? I recall hearing that it was vaguely frowned upon with Tor back in the day for saturating the networ and it didn't seem like there was much reason to use it over basically any VPN, especially speed wise, assuming your motive was to avoid copyright notices.
But isn't it enough to use it just for metadata and not the pyload itself? (provided that's possible)
That's because a copyright holder could easily host a copy of some pirate film on your new network, and then just see the destination of the data packets.
Re: I2P: End-to-end encrypted and anonymous internet
#25Re: I2P: End-to-end encrypted and anonymous internet
#26Re: I2P: End-to-end encrypted and anonymous internet
#27I really like I2P as a project, and I think it gets a lot of things right. For example having every network participant relay some internal traffic, instead of relying on altruism from relay operators, makes it much harder for a single entity to control enough hops to deanonymize users. Sadly, outside of torrenting I2P doesn't seem to have much traction, losing out to the better funded tor project
Torrenting is I2P's foot in the door for much wider adoption, which would help drive other types of usage. I really hope it takes off, especially since qBitTorrent 4.6 just integrated support; the current stagnation of filesharing, especially w.r.t. needing a VPN for everything, needs some shaking up.
Re: I2P: End-to-end encrypted and anonymous internet
#28I could never work out how to use this in the past. Has it gotten any easier to use? Tor made things a lot easier.
Re: I2P: End-to-end encrypted and anonymous internet
#29I really like I2P as a project, and I think it gets a lot of things right. For example having every network participant relay some internal traffic, instead of relying on altruism from relay operators, makes it much harder for a single entity to control enough hops to deanonymize users. Sadly, outside of torrenting I2P doesn't seem to have much traction, losing out to the better funded tor project
I remember I2p torrents being horrendously slow, like 20kbps at max(do you even remember the last time someone used kbps as units?) for popular stuff. Has that changed in the last few years?
I understand that is unheard of from someone living in the "instant access era" but their protocol has a cost.