It depends on what you're doing. This article is more about programming than other kinds of computery work. In the industry I work in (openstack devops/gitops, running a large fleet of ubuntu machines), using Vim isn't a flex, it's just taken for granted that you can and will use Vim at least some of the time.
It's weird when I read threads like this and people treat using Vim as some kind of weird flex. It feels like I'm living on a different planet. Vim isn't a flex, it's a natural part of the broader Unix environment. It works seamlessly with Git, SSH, and the GNU ecosystem of bash, coreutils, gawk, gcc (which are all ubiquitous, too.) In such an environment, the more you learn about Vim, the more it pays off.
Why? Vim is ubiquitous, (relatively) lightweight, extensible with a lot of plugins available, and stable/predictable in its behavior. Its ubiquity and history ensures there is a huge body of documentation about it on the web. Unlike some other editors, it doesn't leave hidden "artifacts" all over the place, just one hidden swp file at a time which vanishes as soon as you save and exit the editor. This politeness is attractive because you don't have to deal with stale or interfering hidden statefulness.
Summary: Although you can edit quickly with Vim, and can keep getting faster the more you learn, it's not like I stick with Vim because "editing speed" is some metric that I really care about. And when assessing a candidate in an interview, it's not like I'm assessing them on their words-per-minute and tell them they need to switch to Vim to match our typing speed standards, lol. I use Vim, and I care about Vim, because it is polite and stable and integrates well with the broader Unix/GNU ecosystem I spend a lot of time working and playing in, and once you get muscle-memory for it, it feels really clunky to try using some other tool which doesn't have the same set of features.