On a tangent to the main point, I like the subtle acknowledgement of our new reality - or at least of the one of many sudden shifts in common software tooling: > Google Translate translates the phrase to “Praise be to God.” ChatGPT translates it to "Praise be to Allah" or "All praise is due to Allah." LLMs turned out to be pretty good at translating, and ChatGPT (especially GPT-4) went straight into competing toe-to-…
I've been playing with it a bit... the other day I asked ChatGPT the name of a certain animal in Urdu and it with complete confidence threw the name of a fruit at me. That said ChatGPT is better at picking up dialect nuances. I can ask it to tell me how to say something in Egyptian Arabic, vs most translation tools will use Modern Standard.
Instagram apologizes for inserting 'terrorist' into Palestinian bio translations
101–110 of 191 posts
Re: Instagram apologizes for inserting 'terrorist' into Palestinian bio translations
#102Re: Instagram apologizes for inserting 'terrorist' into Palestinian bio translations
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
I like it when arabic phrases are changed to be more palatable to western know-nothings. Ask the guy saying "alhamdulillah" if he means Allah or if he means God.
That question is meaningless, because "Allah" is the translation into Arabic of the English word "God". Neither of these two words is a name of a god, which normally does not matter, because both the Christians and the Muslims believe that there exists only one god, so it is not necessary to have a proper name for that god. Obviously, whenever a Christian believer or a Muslim believer speaks about the "God", they spe…
Re: Instagram apologizes for inserting 'terrorist' into Palestinian bio translations
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
How did it know the answer when the cutoff date is meant to January 2022? (I just found another instance at [0] so maybe "cutoff" doesn't mean exactly what it seems.) https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/11iv2uc/theres_no_...
the great march of return was in 2018 - 2019. the idf committed some brutal war crimes against the protestors. watch this video if you'd like to learn more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnZSaKYmP2s i shared the answer to expose the bias of chatgpt. it interjected "including hamas" into the answer and said there were "fatalities on both sides".
Are either of these statements false?
Re: Instagram apologizes for inserting 'terrorist' into Palestinian bio translations
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
If a human translator translated "Praise god" as "Palestinian terrorists are fighting for their freedom" I'm pretty sure they'd be fired immediately. In contrast, Instagram is not going to be taking down their machine translation tool.
I have a couple of things to say about this comment. 1. Instagram (and Facebook) are well known to suppress pro-Palestine voices (can pull up many examples but [0] should work because of that person being named by Time magazine as one of the 100 most influential people in the world, clearly having some influence though I don't know her), so this seems like something consistent with what the company is known to do. 2.…
You're probably thinking of "Allahu Akbar". What the Instagram user wrote was "alhamdulillah", which isn't something that you hear everyday outside of a Muslim-majority country.
Re: Instagram apologizes for inserting 'terrorist' into Palestinian bio translations
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
If a human translator translated "Praise god" as "Palestinian terrorists are fighting for their freedom" I'm pretty sure they'd be fired immediately. In contrast, Instagram is not going to be taking down their machine translation tool.
What's wrong with that? The AI tool did a bad job and they should try to make it better. But I don't understand the relevance of the comparison to a human translator. The alternative to translating this stuff via AI is not hiring humans, it's not translating it at all.
Re: Instagram apologizes for inserting 'terrorist' into Palestinian bio translations
#107This is the sort of thing that could cause people to lose friends or jobs. This is exactly the sort of thing we should be worried about with AI. I feel like machine translations like those on Instagram should come with a disclaimer (in bold, not fine print!).
While true I think the larger issue is this is the sort of thing that can get people murdered (the people mislabeled as terrorists)
Re: Instagram apologizes for inserting 'terrorist' into Palestinian bio translations
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
How did it know the answer when the cutoff date is meant to January 2022? (I just found another instance at [0] so maybe "cutoff" doesn't mean exactly what it seems.) https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/11iv2uc/theres_no_...
the great march of return was in 2018 - 2019. the idf committed some brutal war crimes against the protestors. watch this video if you'd like to learn more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnZSaKYmP2s i shared the answer to expose the bias of chatgpt. it interjected "including hamas" into the answer and said there were "fatalities on both sides".
If you're looking for objective facts, this might not be it.
Re: Instagram apologizes for inserting 'terrorist' into Palestinian bio translations
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree that the average person doesn't generally know how technology works. I think the solution is not to limit the use of technology but to restrict the exposure of the average person to technology until they can prove that they know how it works (some sort of internet license, if you will)
tbf, with AI, even technologists doesn’t generally know how it works.
Re: Instagram apologizes for inserting 'terrorist' into Palestinian bio translations
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think the average person doesn't understand at all what level of accuracy they can expect from AI tools. That is why you have professors relying on ChatGPT to tell them if a student cheated using ChatGPT. HN readers already know not to trust it of course.
I agree that the average person doesn't generally know how technology works. I think the solution is not to limit the use of technology but to restrict the exposure of the average person to technology until they can prove that they know how it works (some sort of internet license, if you will)