Live data from Hacker News

Small business owners say they're pressured to hire off-duty cops for security

minnesotareformer.com

481–490 of 606 posts

Re: Small business owners say they're pressured to hire off-duty cops for security

#481
post #49

> Santamaria was later required to come up with security plans outlining the number of officers needed per night. The officers insisted on getting paid cash, she said. She feared if she didn’t oblige, she’d lose her license. > Eventually, another officer helped schedule off-duty work: Derek Chauvin. He worked security at her club for 17 years. > ... > She sold the club in 2019. When Santamaria saw Chauvin pinning Geo…

One theory I read is that Floyd and Chauvin were part of the same counterfeiting ring operating out of that club, and Chauvin murdered Floyd in order to keep him quiet. (Recall that Floyd was originally arrested for suspected use of a counterfeit $20 bill.) I think maybe part of the idea was that nightclubs are interesting to counterfeiters because they deal with so much cash. (Racism still plays a big part in the Fl…

[dead]

Re: Small business owners say they're pressured to hire off-duty cops for security

#482
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>I didn't know that they worked together. Surprising. It came out fairly shortly after the incident that they were at least known to one another on some level through that security job.

When I learned that I was suspicious that Chauvin was settling some personal score (and that explained why Floyd seemed to believe that Chauvin was going to kill him), but I don't know if any evidence for that came to light. Possibly an under-investigated angle, I'm not sure.

> and that explained why Floyd seemed to believe that Chauvin was going to kill him

This is more simply explained by the fact that Chauvin was in fact killing him.

Re: Small business owners say they're pressured to hire off-duty cops for security

#483

Already, police do this exact shakedown on cities. There are numerous incidents (anecdotal) of US police threatening city officials to reduce enforcement during election cycles, demanding increases in police force budget. Broadly, the US needs to eliminate corruption. There are many broken feedback loops right now from the grand (lobbying and campaign finance) to the minuscule (niche price fixing, bribery, police-ran…

It’s widely believed in New York (I’m not knowledgeable enough to know whether it’s true, but it’s at least widely believed) that the police have been on a “soft strike” since 2020 and have been refusing to deal with anything but the most egregious situations, for political reasons.

Re: Small business owners say they're pressured to hire off-duty cops for security

#484
post #323

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The SF Police Department bombed the mayor's house in 1975: "In early August 1975, the SFPD went on strike over a pay dispute, violating a California law prohibiting police from striking. The city quickly obtained a court order declaring the strike illegal and enjoining the SFPD back to work. The court messenger delivering the order was met with violence and the SFPD continued to strike... The ACLU obtained a court or…

Very naive question: why did Federal law enforcement not get involved?

Federal law enforcement (FBI etc) has a tiny amount of manpower compared to local police. In theory the national guard could have been called in but that would be a huge escalation and I doubt the elected officials wanted to go there.

Re: Small business owners say they're pressured to hire off-duty cops for security

#485
post #477

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> without anyone offering a clear, compelling alternative approach A minor gripe: asking protesters of a utterly shitty, but long standing, complex and entranched situation, to come up clear, simple and compelling alternatives is generally unfair. In particular the political process should work in reverse: people voice issues, and their governing bodies come up with viable solutions. That's their job. > police qualit…

> In particular the political process should work in reverse: people voice issues, and their governing bodies come up with viable solutions. That's their job. I get what you mean but the governing bodies of the people are the people. In a democracy, we are in charge of our own institutions, at least in theory. I agree that we can't lay the full burden for solving injustice on the people affected by that injustice, an…

The US is an extremely flawed democracy. If the US were a functional democracy then maybe popular will would control the police, but it’s not.

Re: Small business owners say they're pressured to hire off-duty cops for security

#486
post #312

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I declined to press charges after I learned that. You were the district attorney at the time this was happening? Why didn't you do more to stop it?

Don't be obtuse. You know they meant they declined to cooperate should the DA pursue charges, and that "decline to press charges" is a popular phrase, if not technically correct. (And if not, you should.)

“Press charges” is exactly correct. It literally means a civilian advocating for charges to be filed. (The actual filing of charges is of course something only the state can do).

Re: Small business owners say they're pressured to hire off-duty cops for security

#487
post #410

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're [deliberately?] misinterpreting the stated intent of the law. A gun that goes off when dropped is substantially less safe than a gun which doesn't. People who buy guns are in fact justified in considering such factors. I think there's a real case to be made that the Californian law is duplicitous and is actually intended to reduce the availability of handguns in California, but that's not the point being raise…

We shouldn’t be doing anything to increase the number of guns in circulation. It reduces safety for everyone, especially the gun owners.

If I could snap my fingers and make all the guns disappear tomorrow, I would. Until then, I've looked down the barrel of another man's gun and been attacked by neo-nazis and the police have disappointed me every time, so I'm gonna carry my own.

Re: Small business owners say they're pressured to hire off-duty cops for security

#488

Already, police do this exact shakedown on cities. There are numerous incidents (anecdotal) of US police threatening city officials to reduce enforcement during election cycles, demanding increases in police force budget. Broadly, the US needs to eliminate corruption. There are many broken feedback loops right now from the grand (lobbying and campaign finance) to the minuscule (niche price fixing, bribery, police-ran…

The Supreme Court is responsible for a lot of this, it has institutionalized immunity for law enforcement and prosecution and unlimited corporate money in politics so that it would require overriding that lever of power which doesn’t seem likely since democrats just rolled over when the gop wouldn’t allow Obama to appoint a Supreme Court justice.

> since democrats just rolled over

Did they have the majority in the senate, does the the senate leader decide the rules?

Re: Small business owners say they're pressured to hire off-duty cops for security

#489
post #370

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When I learned that I was suspicious that Chauvin was settling some personal score (and that explained why Floyd seemed to believe that Chauvin was going to kill him), but I don't know if any evidence for that came to light. Possibly an under-investigated angle, I'm not sure.

if you recognize someone from a previous job, even if he committed a crime, would you kill him if he did not represent any danger ?

That’s a difficult hypothetical considering most of us don’t work in a capacity where we’re allowed to kill people.

Re: Small business owners say they're pressured to hire off-duty cops for security

#490

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think that argument breaks down if the police are Moonlighting in a job that doesn't require police powers. It is one thing, and I think reasonable, say that police can't wear their uniforms when working off duty. It's another thing entirely to say that they can't work at all

In most of the US (if not all - I don't know), off-duty police have the same powers as on-duty police, uniformed or not. That's why people want to hire them. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/when-pol... So if police are allowed to moonlight in other jobs, then they by definition bring those powers to the job - and their legal immunities, and their illegal immunities created by the 'thin blue line'…

Did you read the article? People don't want to hire the off duty police. They are required by law to do it and very unhappy.

They want to hire regular bouncers without the power to arrest to work their nightclubs.

Post reply on HN