Live data from Hacker News

Cockpit: Web-based graphical interface for servers

cockpit-project.org

31–40 of 199 posts

Re: Cockpit: Web-based graphical interface for servers

#31
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Going for that nice mid 1990's vibe? In fairness it's got a wealth of features...it's just ugly as sin.

I've actually been running webmin on my raspberry pi 4 practically every since I got it, the night version of the authentic theme(one of the default) actually looks and feels relatively modern and is updated as well every now and then. My only nitpicks are the obsolete set of tools/panels available (it was the core reason why it took me so much to move from apache to nginx, because there's no nginx panel on the defau…

How's the footprint? Is it usable for investigating problems while the system is strained on resources?

Re: Cockpit: Web-based graphical interface for servers

#32

For self hosting a NAS, I find Cockpit to be leagues better than OMV.

Can I ask why?

I currently use OMV for serving files over my local network (just for myself) and running a handful of Docker containers. It works fine but I don't use 90% of it's features.

Re: Cockpit: Web-based graphical interface for servers

#35
post #5

2022, 81 comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31439811 2021, 128 comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26197510 2018, 149 comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16445612

That's kinda expected as the project matures and more people know about it.

Re: Cockpit: Web-based graphical interface for servers

#36
The cool thing about this project is that as it uses systemd's socket activation, it requires no server processes at all. There is no waste of resources when Cockpit is not being used. Accessing a page is literally the same as invoking a command-line tool (and quitting it). No more, no less. What a beautiful design.

Re: Cockpit: Web-based graphical interface for servers

#37
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This one, maybe? https://camunda.com/platform-7/cockpit/ Either way, the OP Cockpit has been unrestricted LGPL for years now so somehow you're mistaken.

This is definitely not it. There were enterprise and community editions and I was stuck at 15.

Perhaps you mean https://openitcockpit.io/editions/ ?

Re: Cockpit: Web-based graphical interface for servers

#39
post #36

The cool thing about this project is that as it uses systemd's socket activation, it requires no server processes at all. There is no waste of resources when Cockpit is not being used. Accessing a page is literally the same as invoking a command-line tool (and quitting it). No more, no less. What a beautiful design.

I should really spend more time learning systemd. The more I look into it, the more cool and useful features I discover.

Re: Cockpit: Web-based graphical interface for servers

#40
I'm an actual RHCE. This thread has to be some big Red Hatter click farm or something. The artificial positivity is striking. Is Red Hat threatening to pull funding for this project or something? Just weird.

Cockpit is okay but it's basically Red Hat's equivalent to the Windows Server Manager tool, and I have no doubt it was directly inspired by Server Manager. It's development and improvement over the years has been painfully slow.

Nobody who is comfortable with an ssh session uses Cockpit, except maybe to create new VMs, and even then all of these comments comparing it to Proxmox are just whack because it doesn't have a quarter of the features the Proxmox UI offers. The utility for managing VMs is a recent development and even then I still prefer the Virtual Machine Manager tool because I don't want to deal with the latency increase and other limitations of working through a browser.

But anyway, there's a ton of things you can't do with Cockpit, and never will be able to do. It's for people who want to point and click, can't do a bash for/while loop, don't understand pipe chaining commands, and don't like using vim.

Like happyweasel said, it's basically webmin for Red Hat.

It's kinda cool, but it's so old now and development has been so slow and it's been so over-hyped that I don't pay attention to it at all and I've never used it except what was required to get certified.

Post reply on HN