Live data from Hacker News

Passkeys are now enabled by default for Google users

blog.google

121–130 of 684 posts

Re: Passkeys are now enabled by default for Google users

#121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Passkeys are stored within your device, iPhone, Android, browser, or system keychain. https://passkeys.directory/ https://www.stavros.io/posts/clearing-up-some-passkeys-misco... https://support.apple.com/en-us/102195

What if you use an old-fashioned desktop PC?

if the PC has Bluetooth you could use a passkey from a smartphone - besides that, if it's a Windows PC, you could use Windows Hello (with a PIN)

Re: Passkeys are now enabled by default for Google users

#122
post #28

Never. You can pry my passwords from my cold, dead hands.

Entirely this. I do not trust devices to always be working or on my person. I will only use this if I can generate an offline, perfect fidelity backup of my codes.

“But it’s safe in the Google/Apple/Microsoft cloud” is not an acceptable answer.

Re: Passkeys are now enabled by default for Google users

#123
post #10

Nope, not signing up. The trend from Google continues to be towards "if you lose your phone with your credentials, you will be unable to log in". And Google refuses to create a scalable system that allows you access to your account by verifying your identity in person. This is a recipe for disaster. And, possibly, a warning to move off GMail before it gets worse.

For now at least, they saying you can still login with traditional methods as a backup even if using passkeys.

Is it possible to control the credentials in your phone and copy them somewhere else?

Re: Passkeys are now enabled by default for Google users

#124
post #65

Simpson's Paradox lives here. On average, this might increase security (the vast majority of users are terrible at using passwords). For proficient users who use passwords securely, this is an acute drop in security (if forced to use). Forced phone number 2FA has the same effect; in Big G's case forcing phone number 2FA is anti-anonymity disguised as security. In this case, it's a bid for biometrics.

> Forced phone number 2FA has the same effect; in Big G's case forcing phone number 2FA is anti-anonymity disguised as security. It can actually be both; in fact it very likely needs to be: 1. Phone numbers are the best long-term identity most people have 2. Google has billions of users and needs to support account recovery at unbelievable scale 3. Many people lose passwords and devices, but very few lose phone numbe…

All of this is valid!

But it would be even more secure if there was an opt-in "I don't want to use my phone as 2FA".

Phone number authentication creates a weakness for anyone who is in a targeted attack.

A motivated attacker can easily bribe/trick a telecom employee, or if physically accessible, swipe the phone itself to read 2FA texts.

Re: Passkeys are now enabled by default for Google users

#125
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It isn't, and this isn't authentication with a pin. Passkeys also requires the device. Using a pin with this is 2-factor. Pin + hardware token.

So why not just have a password that then unlocks the passkey? I already have a password manager.

The standards group that was behind Fido/U2F has been taken over by people who want to push a new product. That new product is "Log in with your phone" and phone lock screens allow biometrics and pins.

Password managers are not relevant, as you don't use a password manager to unlock your phone.

The people behind the takeover don't really give a shit about Yubikey-style tokens (which haven't achieved much market penetration anyway) but they've left them in to make the takeover less blatent.

Re: Passkeys are now enabled by default for Google users

#126
One question I don't often see asked in regards to passkeys: what is the legal standing in regards to law enforcement access to 'passkeys' vs passwords?

For example, it is completely valid to say I genuinely do not know my 1000 long multiple special character password; it could be on a piece of paper, in a file encrypted with multiple layers. Essentially, there is no foolproof way to ever prove whether I know a given password, or not, especially if the password is only ever in my head (assuming the plaintext version is never logged, all you would ever have as 'proof' is a hash to compare it to).

Passkeys make it so that, I imagine, there is an element of 'proof' at all times; your face, fingerprints (which in some countries you are required by law to provide), I can't disprove I "own" my fingers so that element is always there, and you can be compelled to provide your fingerprints at any time for any reason - with a password, it is impossible to know whether I know a password.

In that sense, a password is far, far, far stronger than any other method of authentication.

Take a scenario: Mr Police wants access to your phone, it's protected only by your fingerprint, pretty easy to gain access. Now do the same but with a password that's sufficiently complex, written on a now shredded piece of paper, and there is genuine plausible deniability.

I imagine in a lot of cases this is extremely important and passkeys will be shunned altogether.

Re: Passkeys are now enabled by default for Google users

#127
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Passkeys are typically synced to cloud storage.

Not just typically - on iOS, you cannot use them at all without iCloud enabled.

On iOS you can use third party software to manage passkeys, there is no inherent cloud requirement.

Re: Passkeys are now enabled by default for Google users

#129
post #13

As a user I still don't understand this. What happens if there's a house fire or something and all my devices where I'm logged in with Google break? How do I log into my account again?

And what if somebody breaks into my google/iCloud account and syncs all my passkeys to their machines?

If they're in your Google/iCloud, you're already in a game over scenario. The point of all this is to prevent that from happening.

You can try to recover by revoking all your passkeys and starting over with hardware tokens, but that's likely what a sophisticated attacker is going to try as well, and they're probably faster than you.

Still way way better than passwords.

Re: Passkeys are now enabled by default for Google users

#130

Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't it fair to say that passkeys secured on your phone are more secure than 1FA (password) but less secure than "traditional" 2FA? Passkey 2FA: unlock your phone and the passkey on your phone can log you in. Traditional 2FA: remember a password AND unlock your phone (where your TOTP is stored) and you can login If I were to rate all 3 methods on a scale of 1 to 10, for convenience and se…

Nobody should be using a remembered password anymore. Most people are likely using the phone for both the password and the MFA code.
Post reply on HN