Live data from Hacker News

"You have a 27% 'AI' issue in here"

twitter.com

141–150 of 266 posts

Re: "You have a 27% 'AI' issue in here"

#141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I doubt oral examinations come back in general. The undergrad model relys on massive classes, I don’t see how you can do oral exams in those 300 person classes without massive cheating as the first students tell everyone else what to expect.

You're right about oral examinations, but written _proctored_ exams would also solve a lot of these problems, particularly if you require it to be handwritten. Having take home essays be handwritten would also help deter using AI by making it much more inconvenient to use compared to just doing the assignment in the first place.

I went to high school (secondary school) back when it was pretty normal to forbid students from typing assignments because "not everyone has a computer". I happen to be personally responsible, via my terrible handwriting, for at least two teachers dropping that policy. At least one other just gave me a specific exception in the name of "accessibility".

Re: "You have a 27% 'AI' issue in here"

#142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> bro what's the big deal bro just write the paper exactly the way we want you to bro

> bro what's the big deal bro just write the paper exactly the way we want you to bro Why are talking like that to me? Are you responding to someone else? I literally cannot comprehend how my suggestion that playing with words might be fun could be interpreted as bro-y. EDIT: Lol I just skimmed your comment history and it's just garbage like this.

> I literally cannot comprehend how my suggestion that playing with words might be fun could be interpreted as bro-y.

Really? You suggest experimentation with fun styles, and you're surprised by a response in a fun style? Bro...

Re: "You have a 27% 'AI' issue in here"

#143
post #133

It feels more and more like we need to rethink what scoring schoolwork means. Worksheets and exams can show how familiar you are with the material, or they can be gamed or useless in some other way. But the best they can ever do is show familiarity. What I really want as a consumer of someone's grade or academic history is how well they WORK in the subject area, along with how well they work with other people, not ju…

College admissions have known this for a long time which is why test scores aren't an automatic entrance. Your schools sound irresponsibly myopic.

Re: "You have a 27% 'AI' issue in here"

#144
post #18

If you submit a word document, is there some way to detect if the words were typed out, how long the document was open etc? Basically trying to detect if the student pasted the text? Obviously students would get around this simply by typing it out word for word, but could work here.

If you use Google Docs, the edit history would pretty clearly the progress and different drafts. I guess eventually somebody will prompt ChatGPT in the right way to create realistic drafts and edits as well.

Re: "You have a 27% 'AI' issue in here"

#145
post #9

I am an Eagle Scout and was awarded it in 1995. As part of that process, I had to write up a detailed document outlining my project including how it was conceived, the work, and the outcome. It was rejected on my initial submission because the reviewers felt I it wasn’t written by a sophomore in HS. My parents rewrote the entire thing in what they described as “baby talk” and it was then accepted. The irony is not lo…

> This is nothing new; it’s been happening forever and will continue to happen, we just have a new reason to drive a race to the bottom. The joke about the pinewood derby was that you could always tell the one kid who actually built his own car (which was the whole point, after all). Because every other car had been carefully engineered, carved, machined, sanded, painted, lacquered, and weighted by a dad. Sounds like…

Hah, mine was a rough-looking klunker that got eliminated pretty early. But I wasn't there for competition, I was there for participation.

Re: "You have a 27% 'AI' issue in here"

#146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why were they so intent on carpet for the science labs? I mean, why change the flooring type at all?

I really want to know as well. Why was the carpet so important to them?

Have you ever interacted with a bureaucracy? They are an LLM assembled from human flesh: Random behavior, incomprehensible rationales, and an unstoppable and undirectable force of iron will.

Re: "You have a 27% 'AI' issue in here"

#147

Comical. Back in the day, when I had to write research papers I would go to Wikipedia by copying the citations verbatim, outline the page, and then essentially rewrite the whole thing in my voice but keeping the exact quotes from the original article since they were cited. At that point, 70% of the hard work is done and you're just regurgitating. Liberal arts is long dead.

So why did you study it?

Re: "You have a 27% 'AI' issue in here"

#148
post #72

The message from the teacher looks like it was written by a bot. Compare notes with other students. If two students got exactly the same text, the teacher is outsourcing their own job to a program. Publicize that.

I don't think retaliation is going to benefit anyone here. If they wanted to be confrontational, I think a constructive approach where they have a conversation with the teacher about false positives in these tools would be better.

Take your money elsewhere. Education should be a market. If you feel that "retaliation" is your only option, then you are mostly likely in a monopolized and non-functioning market. If you get good results, it will be due to luck, and not to anything that you've paid for.

Re: "You have a 27% 'AI' issue in here"

#149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I doubt oral examinations come back in general. The undergrad model relys on massive classes, I don’t see how you can do oral exams in those 300 person classes without massive cheating as the first students tell everyone else what to expect.

You're right about oral examinations, but written _proctored_ exams would also solve a lot of these problems, particularly if you require it to be handwritten. Having take home essays be handwritten would also help deter using AI by making it much more inconvenient to use compared to just doing the assignment in the first place.

The kids have already made workarounds: https://youtube.com/shorts/Xt0VjT_zLZE

Re: "You have a 27% 'AI' issue in here"

#150
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Correct, but the people who should adapt are the institutions and professors. This is not, I think, and unreasonable requirement either, we just need a few professors to be hit with large lawsuits arguing torturous interference with employment (since what most people are in college for is a better job anyway).

If such a lawsuit was successful, wouldn't all professors have the incentive to just pass everyone with top grades, lest someone decide to sue them for "interfering with employment"?

They do have that incentive. https://www.gradeinflation.com/
Post reply on HN