Earlier quoted context omitted.
I doubt oral examinations come back in general. The undergrad model relys on massive classes, I don’t see how you can do oral exams in those 300 person classes without massive cheating as the first students tell everyone else what to expect.
You're right about oral examinations, but written _proctored_ exams would also solve a lot of these problems, particularly if you require it to be handwritten. Having take home essays be handwritten would also help deter using AI by making it much more inconvenient to use compared to just doing the assignment in the first place.
"You have a 27% 'AI' issue in here"
141–150 of 266 posts
Re: "You have a 27% 'AI' issue in here"
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
> bro what's the big deal bro just write the paper exactly the way we want you to bro
> bro what's the big deal bro just write the paper exactly the way we want you to bro Why are talking like that to me? Are you responding to someone else? I literally cannot comprehend how my suggestion that playing with words might be fun could be interpreted as bro-y. EDIT: Lol I just skimmed your comment history and it's just garbage like this.
Really? You suggest experimentation with fun styles, and you're surprised by a response in a fun style? Bro...
Re: "You have a 27% 'AI' issue in here"
#143It feels more and more like we need to rethink what scoring schoolwork means. Worksheets and exams can show how familiar you are with the material, or they can be gamed or useless in some other way. But the best they can ever do is show familiarity. What I really want as a consumer of someone's grade or academic history is how well they WORK in the subject area, along with how well they work with other people, not ju…
Re: "You have a 27% 'AI' issue in here"
#144If you submit a word document, is there some way to detect if the words were typed out, how long the document was open etc? Basically trying to detect if the student pasted the text? Obviously students would get around this simply by typing it out word for word, but could work here.
Re: "You have a 27% 'AI' issue in here"
#145I am an Eagle Scout and was awarded it in 1995. As part of that process, I had to write up a detailed document outlining my project including how it was conceived, the work, and the outcome. It was rejected on my initial submission because the reviewers felt I it wasn’t written by a sophomore in HS. My parents rewrote the entire thing in what they described as “baby talk” and it was then accepted. The irony is not lo…
> This is nothing new; it’s been happening forever and will continue to happen, we just have a new reason to drive a race to the bottom. The joke about the pinewood derby was that you could always tell the one kid who actually built his own car (which was the whole point, after all). Because every other car had been carefully engineered, carved, machined, sanded, painted, lacquered, and weighted by a dad. Sounds like…
Re: "You have a 27% 'AI' issue in here"
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why were they so intent on carpet for the science labs? I mean, why change the flooring type at all?
I really want to know as well. Why was the carpet so important to them?
Re: "You have a 27% 'AI' issue in here"
#147Comical. Back in the day, when I had to write research papers I would go to Wikipedia by copying the citations verbatim, outline the page, and then essentially rewrite the whole thing in my voice but keeping the exact quotes from the original article since they were cited. At that point, 70% of the hard work is done and you're just regurgitating. Liberal arts is long dead.
Re: "You have a 27% 'AI' issue in here"
#148The message from the teacher looks like it was written by a bot. Compare notes with other students. If two students got exactly the same text, the teacher is outsourcing their own job to a program. Publicize that.
I don't think retaliation is going to benefit anyone here. If they wanted to be confrontational, I think a constructive approach where they have a conversation with the teacher about false positives in these tools would be better.
Re: "You have a 27% 'AI' issue in here"
#149Earlier quoted context omitted.
I doubt oral examinations come back in general. The undergrad model relys on massive classes, I don’t see how you can do oral exams in those 300 person classes without massive cheating as the first students tell everyone else what to expect.
You're right about oral examinations, but written _proctored_ exams would also solve a lot of these problems, particularly if you require it to be handwritten. Having take home essays be handwritten would also help deter using AI by making it much more inconvenient to use compared to just doing the assignment in the first place.
Re: "You have a 27% 'AI' issue in here"
#150Earlier quoted context omitted.
Correct, but the people who should adapt are the institutions and professors. This is not, I think, and unreasonable requirement either, we just need a few professors to be hit with large lawsuits arguing torturous interference with employment (since what most people are in college for is a better job anyway).
If such a lawsuit was successful, wouldn't all professors have the incentive to just pass everyone with top grades, lest someone decide to sue them for "interfering with employment"?