Earlier quoted context omitted.
> If a merchant wanted to, it would be trivial for them to give you a 3% discount for paying with debit. I don't believe that a merchant is allowed to do this? Probably very dependent on your deal with credit card processors but my understanding is that the default contract between a merchant and a credit card processor stipulates that you are not allowed to offer discounts to not use credit cards differently. Of cou…
> I don't believe that a merchant is allowed to do this? A federal law was passed over 10 years ago allowing this. https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/new-rules-el... > A PCN cannot stop you from offering your customers a discount or another incentive for using a certain method of payment, as long as you offer it to all your customers and disclose the offer clearly and conspicuously. For example, you can…
D.C.'s ban on cashless businesses takes effect
391–400 of 508 posts
Re: D.C.'s ban on cashless businesses takes effect
#392Earlier quoted context omitted.
Many business accounts have a monthly allowance of free cash deposits, but the standard fee is 30¢ per $100. https://www.bankofamerica.com/salesservices/smallbusiness/re... https://www08.wellsfargomedia.com/assets/pdf/small-business/...
Thanks for the details. While I think it's ridiculous, a 0.3% fee for over $20k in deposited cash per month doesn't sound unreasonable for handling risk. Personally, I wouldn't be banking with either of those companies because I think they just exist as parasites. Find a good credit union.
Consumer banking is a very different beast to business banking.
Re: D.C.'s ban on cashless businesses takes effect
#393Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yup I’ve seen a large grocery store keep business going during an extended power outage with hand-written ledgers and cash transactions. Customers kept coming in to shop despite the outage.
The restaurant I worked at years ago would bust out those old slider-carbon-copy things for credit cards during power outages.
Re: D.C.'s ban on cashless businesses takes effect
#394Earlier quoted context omitted.
>From an operational and strategic security POV, cash is a vastly superior technology. It doesn't need electricity, a network of cables, satellites and routers. If the power goes out, I can't get any cash. I don't keep any meaningful amount cash on hand and neither does anyone I know, including my elderly relatives. Most of the stores I shop at won't actually be able to sell me anything, because none of the products…
>> If the power goes out, I can't get any cash. I don't keep any meaningful amount cash on hand and neither does anyone I know, including my elderly relatives. Well, that is well on your single data point, here is mine: I live in a bad weather prone area of the united states. I do not know _anyone_ that does _not_ have a meaningful amount of cash in the house for bad weather. Yes, stores here operate with low/no powe…
Re: D.C.'s ban on cashless businesses takes effect
#395Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wait, is it common in the US for brick-and-mortar businesses to charge you extra if you pay by card? That doesn't happen in the UK.
We definitely did that in the Netherlands when I worked at a computer store. Credit cards are comparatively rare, and while "2%" doesn't sound much it's a significant fraction of our profit margin. On a €600 laptop or desktop we'd earn maybe €50 to €75. The €12 is a comparatively large fraction of that. We didn't actually make that much more money from more expensive laptops, so for a €1,000 model we'd typically also…
Re: D.C.'s ban on cashless businesses takes effect
#396Earlier quoted context omitted.
Let's think about who wouldn't be fine in a cashless economy: * Elderly people who struggle with technology. * People fleeing coercive situations like domestic abuse where their abuser controls their finances. * People with mental disabilities, for whom cash might be the only thing they know how to use. * Homeless people, who might literally rely on cash to survive. * Poorer people who prefer cash because it helps th…
> So basically, I think that asking "why should a business be forced by law to accept cash?" is like asking "why should a business be forced by law to provide wheelchair ramps and elevators?" If you don't think the answer is obvious, then you need to check your privilege. If you don’t think the answer is the federal government should be providing the necessary infrastructure, then you want retail business operators t…
Re: D.C.'s ban on cashless businesses takes effect
#397Almost every comment is about politics, choice, privacy, rights, markets and percentages. There's a completely different take; Civic resilience From an operational and strategic security POV, cash is a vastly superior technology. It doesn't need electricity, a network of cables, satellites and routers. Therefore cash in circulation acts as a buffer that provides economic stability and continuity of operations. Also,…
Re: D.C.'s ban on cashless businesses takes effect
#398Earlier quoted context omitted.
Cash is a superior technology for security -> Huh? The bullet proof glass cage protecting the cashiers is the “technology”.
That's too literal a view. In security thinking we have to consider the safety of all stakeholders, and the whole ecosystem/collective/society at large.
You can have all the tech for proving that a dollar is legit, but it nobody cares if the dollar is legit, then it doesn't matter
Re: D.C.'s ban on cashless businesses takes effect
#399Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have you never walked into a store and they said you can't use a CC because their reader is down? It is nice to have a few dollars in your pocket for times like that.
I have literally called ahead to order food then arrive to pick it up and be told that the card reader has not been working all day. Had no cash so I just ended up leaving.
Re: D.C.'s ban on cashless businesses takes effect
#400Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is an element of injustice, the poor and immigrants may not have the same access to banks and credit as others do.
Unironically, those that rage against "The Cashless Society" also rage against "the poor and immigrants".