Live data from Hacker News

Common infections can spark psychiatric illnesses in children

economist.com

241–245 of 245 posts

Re: Common infections can spark psychiatric illnesses in children

#241

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From the paper “The Neurobiology of Long COVID”: Demonstrated effects of reactive microglia after COVID-19 include a reduction in oligodendrocytes and myelinated axons, highlighting disrupted myelin homeostasis. — The UK Biobank study discussed above compared magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data before and after SARS-CoV-2 infection in 401 individuals and 385 matched controls. MRI data obtained an average of 141 day…

Will CBT help with impaired oxygen perfusion of tissue caused by a pathogen known to cause pervasive vascular damage and severely deranged blood clotting? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002628622...

Also, why does CBT work when it does?

Oxytocin is directly anti-inflammatory and CBT can and does affect oxytocin secretion.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15374416.2023.2...

Re: Common infections can spark psychiatric illnesses in children

#242

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> don't worry, i'm sure it doesn't mean anything. It means we invented mRNA vaccines, which were never organisms of any kind. But they're clearly vaccines. Whatever dictionary you picked updated its definition accordingly. Strictly speaking, according to your "Nov, 2020" definition, smallpox is a cowpox vaccine. I think that's silly. I'd prefer a definition like: > vaccine (n): a substance that supplies antigenic inf…

I submit that my problem with this is that mRNA therapeutics aren't vaccines, they're mRNA therapeutics. The word "Vaccine" comes from "cow" because of cowpox. Changing the definition so pfizer et al can rake in $50 billion is what i take issue with. If they had said "This isn't a vaccine it's genetic modification" or whatever, no one would have signed up for it. It was a concentrated effort to change language. Contr…

It wouldn't have been true to say it's genetic modification. Many viruses do perform genetic modification, and it's theoretically possible to develop mRNA therapeutics that perform genetic modification (by having the cell construct the protein machinery required to do so) but mRNA vaccines don't do that. Doing that is hard, and unnecessary.

It's like the difference between an image and a computer program. Sure, you can sometimes construct a WebP image that executes arbitrary code, if you have enough information about the execution environment, but that doesn't make all (or even most) images programs, and it doesn't mean we should delete all the diagrams from our textbooks. Or the difference between a spoon and a razor blade. Metal can be shaped into sharp blades, but that doesn't mean we should swear off putting cutlery in our mouths.

More to the point, I don't see the argument for not calling mRNA vaccines vaccines. Did you think that live attenuated viruses don't have RNA in them?

Re: Common infections can spark psychiatric illnesses in children

#243
post #127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Of course you can control your actions. But that doesn't mean they can't be influenced by external factors like drugs, weather, or in your case low blood sugar. You don't have absolute total free will in all situations. That's why development of willpower is such a huge discipline (religion, meditation, etc). There's a range where your blood sugar starts to influence your actions, with more willpower and cultivating…

Willpower occurs after awareness. They are objectively different things. If you are not aware of something, you cannot choose to make a reaction for or against it. For example, imagine that your body did not detect heat. If you put your hand on a burner you would instinctively withdraw from it (and yes this happens in people that do not feel pain). Willpower is in the ballpark of conscious awareness. "I choose to do…

I'm not sure what you are trying to say, but free will, I think, requires consciousness. If you want to train to keep your hand on a burner wouldn't that be free will. Are we implying that because we can sense pain and other things that we don't have free will. Free will doesn't mean you are omnipotent. You can choose to put your hand on a burner and you can choose to practice keeping it there, both are examples of free will. An instinct to avoid pain isn't negating the free ability to make choices.

Re: Common infections can spark psychiatric illnesses in children

#244

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Psychiatry is a religious community that occasionally includes scientists, but they're largely regarded as delusional or backwards, and derided or ostracized as needed.

It’s comments like this that completely prove my point. The idea that psychiatry is “religious” is absurd.

You know, I thought about it at length tonight and I totally agree with your assertion. The comparison is ridiculous and absurd and I was way out of line. The downvotes were just.

  There is nothing biblical or doctrinal about the DSM/PDR

  There is nothing clerical about doctors, nurses, or orderlies, they don't have no ordination kind of ceremonies and they certainly don't wear any kind of distinctive garb that sets them apart, nor are they authority figures who are respected and obeyed by the community. These dudes all have casual temporary jobs, it's not like a vocational calling or life profession, you know.

  There is nothing sacramental about psychotherapy (where a person enters a small room and whispers her secrets to a professional and gets helped) and there's certainly nothing Eucharistic about medications. I mean seriously, compare "My Body, My Choice" to "THIS is My Body, which will be given up for You."
Honestly, I write a lot of stuff on HN and send it before I even doublecheck it. Consider this an errata and please do accept my apologies.

  There's nothing communal or familial about health care. In contrast to worship and churches, health care is private, secret, done in small offices one-at-a-time; we're separated in hospitals and during plagues due to infection controls

  Nobody sings anything ever

  Christianity and most other ancient religions are built on millennia of unchanging doctrine, practices, apostolic tradition, and familial bonds, passed on to all children. Medicine and psychiatry invalidate their doctrines every couple of hundred years and reinvent themselves anew. Practices and beliefs from history books are ineffective, barbaric, reviled and abhorrent to moderns.

  Most religions rely on donations from the faithful, and few can actually compel such; psychiatry demands tribute and wealthy corporate supporters who can step in and guarantee their solvency, plus the state can usually use laws and punishment to coerce more people into joining and participating.

Re: Common infections can spark psychiatric illnesses in children

#245

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Canadian system absolutely requires a referral from your GP to see a specialist. And even in the US, when you do have insurance that allows you to see a specialist without a referral, there are some specialists who won’t see you without a referral anyway, I assume because they don’t want to deal with random people off the street.

> The Canadian system absolutely requires a referral from your GP to see a specialist I presume that's only when you want your expenses covered. If you pay with your own money/private insurance you can see whoever you want, no?

There are some rules hobbling the private system in Canada that don’t exist in every country with universal healthcare. As I understand it, if a doctor participates in the public system they’re limited in their ability to accept private-pay patients. Happy to take correction here from Canadians who know better.
Post reply on HN