Live data from Hacker News

Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

meta.com

611–620 of 967 posts

Re: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

#611

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would be so uncomfortable having lunch with someone wearing these. Am I alone in that?

I mean, the light makes it VERY apparent when it's recording or taking a picture. Would you be just as uncomfortable eating lunch with someone who had their phone in their hand? It'd be much easier to surreptitiously record/photograph someone with a phone because they have no status indicator when they're recording and people inadvertently point phone lenses at each other all the time.

I vote for a flip-cover that visibly shows that the camera lens is covered. Like clip-ons, taken to the next level of dork.

Re: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

#612

Gen 1 had horrible picture quality. Casey Neistat made a review and it wasn't nowhere near good as an iPhone 5 from 2012 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PF3iysOyelg&t=280s If this has a better picture quality, like up to the ~2023 smartphone camera standards then I'll buy one. I really like the idea.

Honestly my biggest beef with this isn't the quality but the field of vision. It's so incredibly narrow and not at all how we imagine a "first person perspective" looks like for a human. (I know we lie to ourselves, and think that our peripheral vision is better than it is, but it doesn't matter)

Yes. I think this was a conscious choice. The field of view allows for a more compelling AR/VR projection.

Re: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

#613
Did Facebook (er, Meta) completely overlook the extreme backlash to the same concept 10 years ago with Google Glasses? Just look up articles from that time, e.g. https://nypost.com/2014/07/14/is-google-glass-cool-or-just-p... What makes them think it's different this time?

From 2014:

"“Glasshole” has become the term du jour, and outrage has spiraled so out of control that San Francisco has seen a series of reported attacks on users.

New York City’s not immune to the backlash, either.

Gottfried chased down a man who had stolen his Glass right off his face. (He also had an incident at a San Francisco bar where drunken patrons accused him of recording them. He insists he wasn’t.)

In April, a techie war erupted when East Village restaurant Feast kicked out Glass-user Katy Kasmai after she refused to remove her device. Kasmai vented online, and hundreds of Glass groupies rallied against Feast on Google, accusing the eatery of discriminating “against people who are into new technology.”

Feast co-owner Brian Ghaw is unapologetic. He says Feast’s no-Glass policy is for guests’ peace of mind. “They just felt uncomfortable about having somebody who could potentially videotape them,” explains Ghaw. “If someone were sitting at a table with their smartphone constantly pointing in a certain direction and you didn’t know what they were doing with it, you’d feel pretty uncomfortable as well.”"

Re: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

#614
post #495

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As someone in that cohort, the number of people that feel the same way as me is nearly non-existent. The only people that seem to share the sentiment are my parents and my older colleagues. I have an Apple Watch primarily to avoid having to take my phone out while still being able to see important notifications (I love the focus mode stuff) so I'm not some kind of anti-tech ideologue either. Most other people are not…

I got an Apple Watch for this reason when they first came out and found out that people constantly thought I was bored or had to leave because I kept glancing at my watch. Looking at the phone never got a negative response.

As field anthropology, this is an interesting observation.

Re: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

#616

This technology creeps me out. I can’t imagine interacting with someone who’s wearing a pair of these, much less have a conversation. It would be like trying to talk with someone who’s sticking their smartphone in your face. Better looking and more refined tech, but fundamentally Glasshole 2.0. Zuck is the perfect ambassador after Brin.

Just to clarify the cameras are very well fit into the profile of the glasses, so it doesn’t look like “camera” glasses in person. Ray ban did a good job here.

But on the flip side it’s very obvious when you’re filming (bright white light comes on), so it’s less creepy.

Oh and obviously unless you’re an influencer and streaming the camera aren’t always active. I agree it’s weird to hang out with streaming influencers.

The way this + my Apple Watch has reduced my phone usage when on the go I truly appreciate. I wish Facebook sold it with that point in mind but they won’t for obvious business cannibalization reasons.

Re: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

#617

This technology creeps me out. I can’t imagine interacting with someone who’s wearing a pair of these, much less have a conversation. It would be like trying to talk with someone who’s sticking their smartphone in your face. Better looking and more refined tech, but fundamentally Glasshole 2.0. Zuck is the perfect ambassador after Brin.

[deleted]

Re: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

#618

Did Facebook (er, Meta) completely overlook the extreme backlash to the same concept 10 years ago with Google Glasses? Just look up articles from that time, e.g. https://nypost.com/2014/07/14/is-google-glass-cool-or-just-p... What makes them think it's different this time? From 2014: "“Glasshole” has become the term du jour, and outrage has spiraled so out of control that San Francisco has seen a series of reported a…

[deleted]

Re: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

#619

> designed for living in the moment while expressing yourself to the max. Why would they write copy like this? Surely it causes a visceral cringe reaction in anybody over 35, say. Is Generation Z a clean slate for 1980s vague hyperbolic ad-speak?

[deleted]

Re: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

#620

Imagine the creepy stuff people will be doing with this and deep fake tech? Taking a bunch of video of the cute girl who works at the bar and converting that into whatever sick fantasy you like. Imagine all the intimate footage you’re sharing and will lose when Facebook eventually gets hacked… Kind of keen for someone to develop a portable EMP device…

[deleted]
Post reply on HN