Live data from Hacker News

Minecraft Wiki has decided to leave Fandom

minecraft.wiki

131–140 of 210 posts

Re: Minecraft Wiki has decided to leave Fandom

#131
post #125

The problem is 'Fandom' (a gross brand name I would refuse to say without airquotes) always has better SEO. The Elder Scrolls has an excellent independent wiki, UESP, but normal people click the first Google result and have no way of knowing it isn't the 'right' wiki

Fandom is a fantastic name for this kind of thing...

Re: Minecraft Wiki has decided to leave Fandom

#132
post #60

Excellent. I hope to see more games following suit away from the bloated messes of fandom/fextralife. At times they feel unusable on mobile. And I don't think a single user has wanted to see the embedded twitch streams when they're just trying to get some information quickly.

Star Citizen is another. I don't know if it "moved" so much as someone not connected to the earlier fandom wiki said "This sucks, I made a new one."

https://starcitizen.tools/

https://starcitizen.fandom.com/

And a recent post on reddit about the wiki's funding appears to have gotten their patreon up to $140 compared to $110 server costs.

https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/16bo02n/star_c...

Re: Minecraft Wiki has decided to leave Fandom

#133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I remember in 2009 or 2010, when I first came across Minecraft. It was not hugely popular yet, but it already had quite an active community. I played quite a few hours of the game, both alone and together with a couple of friends. One day, after a couple of weeks or something, I learned about a crafting wiki that told you how to craft different items. At the time, at least for me, it was not clear how you figure out…

Never having played Minecraft: does this game not come with a manual? (even if it's in PDF form or the like?)

no, and there's no tutorial or anything. it's weird to jump right into the game without prior experience. you sort of need a friend to explain it to you.

Re: Minecraft Wiki has decided to leave Fandom

#135
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They really have gotten worse and it's incresibly frustrating that DDG seems to ignore the Infosphere (and WikiSimpsons) entirely in favor of the fandom sites.

Kagi makes it easy to essentially delist entire domains. So nice for when you find a content farm or for sites like pinterest. They even provide a list of the most blocked domains: https://kagi.com/stats (Click "Domain Insights")

It's probably safer to lower this one's ranking, rather than absolutely block it. There's more than a handful of things for which fandom.com is the correct result—the only actively-maintained wiki.

Trust the search engine to do the signal/noise calculations for you. You are no longer on Google. Kagi is your agent, not your adversary.

Re: Minecraft Wiki has decided to leave Fandom

#136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I remember in 2009 or 2010, when I first came across Minecraft. It was not hugely popular yet, but it already had quite an active community. I played quite a few hours of the game, both alone and together with a couple of friends. One day, after a couple of weeks or something, I learned about a crafting wiki that told you how to craft different items. At the time, at least for me, it was not clear how you figure out…

Never having played Minecraft: does this game not come with a manual? (even if it's in PDF form or the like?)

Not at the time. Now there's a guide structured as quests, as well blueprints in the crafting ui

Re: Minecraft Wiki has decided to leave Fandom

#138
post #98
post #74

Is there some reason they can't just edit the Fandom wiki and modify each page to point at the new one? (Maybe Fandom would revert the changes?)

Yeah it's against fandom rules. Wikis aren't allowed to link to their replacements

Ugh.

I always hesitate before browsing to a Fandom wiki because the user experience is so full of dark patterns. I guess this is just another facet of that...

Re: Minecraft Wiki has decided to leave Fandom

#139
post #102

UESP is the gold standard for wikis. https://uesp.net/wiki/Main_Page

Bethesda enjoyers are blessed with this wonderful wiki. And action RPG fans have fextralife - another solid gold standard for wikis. It's a great time to be a fan. https://fextralife.com/

Fextralife is worse than fandom, by far. The forced twitch view botting along with the horrendous site layout make it one of the worst wiki sites that exist.

Re: Minecraft Wiki has decided to leave Fandom

#140

For some background, the old wiki was hosted on Fandom. All the major volunteer contributors are moving to minecraft.wiki, but the old page will almost certainly stay up, frozen in time, throwing trackers and ads on kids not savvy enough to locate the new link. It is interesting to me how many games, Minecraft in particular, rely on wikis - they're very different experiences, sometimes almost unplayable, if you don't…

>but the old page will almost certainly stay up, frozen in time, throwing trackers and ads on kids not savvy enough to locate the new link

Eerily reminiscent of w3schools for people getting into web dev.

Post reply on HN