Live data from Hacker News

Minecraft Wiki has decided to leave Fandom

minecraft.wiki

111–120 of 210 posts

Re: Minecraft Wiki has decided to leave Fandom

#111

Doesn’t the domain name clearly infringe on Microsoft’s trademark? Even as someone who is knowledgeable, I can see this causing confusion. As useful as this is, I don’t see site lasting for very long at the current domain without an agreement from the trademark owner.

The previous domain was minecraftwiki.net, and I don't see a big difference here?

Re: Minecraft Wiki has decided to leave Fandom

#112
WoWWiki (now called Wowpedia) is thinking about leaving Fandom too [1], which is interesting when you consider their past.

Back in the day, WoWWiki started as its own thing before it shifted over to Wikia (what we now know as Fandom).

Wikia was even worse than Fandom today. They had this set layout that didn’t work for many of the wikis they brought in. This led some folks from the community to branch out and create Wowpedia, which was on its own again.

Later, Wowpedia joined Curse's Gamepedia, kind of like Wikia but not as in-your-face.

But here’s the twist: in 2018, Fandom/Wikia bought Gamepedia. So, Wowpedia landed back with Fandom. At some point, they decided to archive WoWWiki so there is only Wowpedia now.

----

My personal opinion in general about this topic is that Fandom is a very bad host (Wikia used to be worse, to be fair), but the worst is having two competing wikis.

At least in this Minecraft's case, it looks like the majority of contributors moved together.

The situation of WowWiki/Wowpedia at the time was just sad, a lot of hard work went down the drain.

And speaking of which, isn’t the Terraria Wiki going through something similar right now?

Out of two wikis:

https://terraria.fandom.com/wiki/Terraria_Wiki https://terraria.wiki.gg/wiki/Terraria_Wiki

I can't figure out which one’s busier right now. I understand that terraria.wiki.gg now is the "official" one, but if you check out their recent change frequencies, they seem pretty close.

I can’t help thinking there's a lot of duplicated effort here too.

[1] https://wowpedia.fandom.com/wiki/Forum:Vote_to_Leave_Fandom

Re: Minecraft Wiki has decided to leave Fandom

#113
post #101
post #65

I still maintain an independent Futurama wiki from Fandom. Back when they were called Wikia, they wanted to merge with our wiki, but I insisted on a no ads policy. So talks basically went nowhere. They still have a Futurama wiki, and ours is still online. Though, these days, it's mostly other editors filling in the content, I am just a system administrator at this point. I am still happy with our decision, because Wi…

Do you maintain the Infosphere? Because I love that site. Such a gem.

Yes. I was not the original creator. However, when they felt it was too much of a hassle to maintain the site, I asked to take over. The original creator of the site still owns the domain.

Re: Minecraft Wiki has decided to leave Fandom

#114

Doesn’t the domain name clearly infringe on Microsoft’s trademark? Even as someone who is knowledgeable, I can see this causing confusion. As useful as this is, I don’t see site lasting for very long at the current domain without an agreement from the trademark owner.

IANAL but I would assume that, since they're moving from "minecraft.fandom.com" to "minecraft.wiki", it should be no more infringing than what they previously had, unless second-level domain names are subject to more scrutiny than third-level domain names. And if that's the case, then I would expect that the infringing party would be their domain name registrar, for being the one to sell them the hypothetically infringing name (which isn't to say that the operators of the server couldn't be subject to trademark claims for other reasons unrelated to the domain name).

Re: Minecraft Wiki has decided to leave Fandom

#115

WoWWiki (now called Wowpedia) is thinking about leaving Fandom too [1], which is interesting when you consider their past. Back in the day, WoWWiki started as its own thing before it shifted over to Wikia (what we now know as Fandom). Wikia was even worse than Fandom today. They had this set layout that didn’t work for many of the wikis they brought in. This led some folks from the community to branch out and create…

Out of curiousity: In what ways was Wikia worse than Fandom?

Re: Minecraft Wiki has decided to leave Fandom

#117

WoWWiki (now called Wowpedia) is thinking about leaving Fandom too [1], which is interesting when you consider their past. Back in the day, WoWWiki started as its own thing before it shifted over to Wikia (what we now know as Fandom). Wikia was even worse than Fandom today. They had this set layout that didn’t work for many of the wikis they brought in. This led some folks from the community to branch out and create…

Out of curiousity: In what ways was Wikia worse than Fandom?

Their fixed-width layout.

Re: Minecraft Wiki has decided to leave Fandom

#118
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reminder, you can exclude any site from search results on at least Google and DDG, e.g. '-site:fandom.com' will exclude *.fandom.com from results. There's also a 'ublacklist' extension which lets you block sites from search results as well. I think this edits the results to erase matched sites, though - you're not communicating to Google, et al. that you don't want to see that site.

ublacklist only works on google, and the OP was using DDG though.

It supports Bing, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Ecosia, Qwant, Searx, Startpage.com, Yahoo! JAPAN and Yandex.

https://iorate.github.io/ublacklist/docs

Re: Minecraft Wiki has decided to leave Fandom

#119

For some background, the old wiki was hosted on Fandom. All the major volunteer contributors are moving to minecraft.wiki, but the old page will almost certainly stay up, frozen in time, throwing trackers and ads on kids not savvy enough to locate the new link. It is interesting to me how many games, Minecraft in particular, rely on wikis - they're very different experiences, sometimes almost unplayable, if you don't…

I remember in 2009 or 2010, when I first came across Minecraft. It was not hugely popular yet, but it already had quite an active community. I played quite a few hours of the game, both alone and together with a couple of friends. One day, after a couple of weeks or something, I learned about a crafting wiki that told you how to craft different items. At the time, at least for me, it was not clear how you figure out…

Never having played Minecraft: does this game not come with a manual? (even if it's in PDF form or the like?)

Re: Minecraft Wiki has decided to leave Fandom

#120
post #71
post #65

I still maintain an independent Futurama wiki from Fandom. Back when they were called Wikia, they wanted to merge with our wiki, but I insisted on a no ads policy. So talks basically went nowhere. They still have a Futurama wiki, and ours is still online. Though, these days, it's mostly other editors filling in the content, I am just a system administrator at this point. I am still happy with our decision, because Wi…

They really have gotten worse and it's incresibly frustrating that DDG seems to ignore the Infosphere (and WikiSimpsons) entirely in favor of the fandom sites.

Kagi makes it easy to essentially delist entire domains. So nice for when you find a content farm or for sites like pinterest. They even provide a list of the most blocked domains: https://kagi.com/stats (Click "Domain Insights")
Post reply on HN