Earlier quoted context omitted.
Morals have nothing to do with any of this
[flagged]
U.S. has world’s highest rate of children living in single-parent households (2019)
111–120 of 124 posts
Re: U.S. has world’s highest rate of children living in single-parent households (2019)
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s funny that more birth control is still touted as a possible solution when it has never been more available and the situation has never been worse.
It has been more available. Are you aware a mother just went to prison for procuring her daughter birth control?
Re: U.S. has world’s highest rate of children living in single-parent households (2019)
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
It has been more available. Are you aware a mother just went to prison for procuring her daughter birth control?
Aggregate statistics might be more illuminating than anecdotes.
You stated that birth control is more available now than ever. Aggregate statistics might be more illuminating than not even an anecdote. I’d like to see a source that shows more birth control access in America than there was several years ago.
Re: U.S. has world’s highest rate of children living in single-parent households (2019)
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
Worse for whom? And “love” isn’t even required for marriage. Love marriages are a relatively new innovation.
Worse for everyone involved. Adults in bad marriages do not make for good parents. Children exposed to abusive marriages are predisposed to considering abusive marriages normal, therefore perpetuating the cycle. And the implication that "love" isn't desirable in a marriage because it's a modern idea is laughable. Child mortality rates less than 80% are a relatively new innovation; shall we get rid of those too? Lovin…
Do you believe majority of bad marriages are abusive?
Re: U.S. has world’s highest rate of children living in single-parent households (2019)
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can't possibly imagine that is accurate, and even if it was that wouldn't be ethically viable anyway.
Personally, I think growing up without the freedom leave a bad relationship would be enough on its own to make the environment qualify as unhealthy.
The problem is "bad relationship" is a broad and fuzzy concept, often conveniently left undefined or defined selectively to bolster a particular position.
There are definitely situations where divorce is probably good for the kids (e.g. the more extreme ones, like physical abuse). However there are other perhaps more common situations where divorce is on the whole harmful to the kids (e.g. mom and dad just don't have "that spark" for each other anymore).
Re: U.S. has world’s highest rate of children living in single-parent households (2019)
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly: having to bond with a crazy or abusive parent is what's actually unhealthy, not lacking a parent. Children grow up perfectly fine making bonds with non-parents. (See also the father/mother figure trope.) They may do it even if the parent(s) exist but were not fit for the role. In many countries extended families can help sort this out. It is only a bigger problem if you have a single parent + no extended fam…
Lone parent children can grow up fine. They very often do not. Teachers are part of large state institutions, paid workers. They're not going to finance someone's surgery, rent, or groceries. Offloading this kind of stuff onto the state doesn't work well because the situations aren't legible and the type of support required necessitates a great deal of intimacy on the part of the benefactor and a great deal of vulner…
Children with both parents also very often do not grow up fine if they are in certain socioeconomic divisions. That needs to be eliminated from the equation before any such generalizations.
Re: U.S. has world’s highest rate of children living in single-parent households (2019)
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
could it be that asian devotion for kids is stronger such that even if the marriage is unhappy they will do their best to make sure the kids are ok? western couples are less likely to do that which means that kids there will suffer more especially if their parents are openly fighting, and divorce helps them settle because happier parents makes for happier kids.
“Asian” and “western” describe huge and varied populations with little in common. One refers to a geographic designation, the other to a shared set of cultural norms and economic development. What evidence do you have that “Asian” parents (whomever that refers to) show more devotion to their children? Or that “western” couples show less care? Extended family situations, kids living with grandparents or aunts and uncl…
I come from South Asia. It’s my observation that Americans are far less willing to sacrifice their personal happiness and well being for their kids.
Re: U.S. has world’s highest rate of children living in single-parent households (2019)
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
Worse for whom? And “love” isn’t even required for marriage. Love marriages are a relatively new innovation.
Worse for everyone involved. Adults in bad marriages do not make for good parents. Children exposed to abusive marriages are predisposed to considering abusive marriages normal, therefore perpetuating the cycle. And the implication that "love" isn't desirable in a marriage because it's a modern idea is laughable. Child mortality rates less than 80% are a relatively new innovation; shall we get rid of those too? Lovin…
Statistics show that neither do divorces and single parents.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240051/ (“The best scientific literature to date suggests that, with the exception of parents faced with unresolvable marital violence, children fare better when parents work at maintaining the marriage.”).
> Children exposed to abusive marriages are predisposed to considering abusive marriages normal, therefore perpetuating the cycle.
Abuse used to be a ground for divorce prior to modern no-fault divorce.
> And the implication that "love" isn't desirable in a marriage because it's a modern idea is laughable.
Obviously it’s desirable. But if you take a shot at your love marriage, and then you “fall out of love,” should you be able to inflict the financial and emotional damage of divorce on your kids?
Re: U.S. has world’s highest rate of children living in single-parent households (2019)
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
No they don't, that's baseless gibberish.
Divorce has tremendous negative consequences on children. The childhood poverty rate for children of married couples is under 7%. For the children of single parents it’s over 37%. A Stanford study found that children of divorce die five years earlier than children of intact families.
See: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240051/ (“The best scientific literature to date suggests that, with the exception of parents faced with unresolvable marital violence, children fare better when parents work at maintaining the marriage.”).