Live data from Hacker News

Evidence mounts on toxic pollution from tires

e360.yale.edu

81–90 of 120 posts

Re: Evidence mounts on toxic pollution from tires

#81
post #29

and unfortunately, EV's are worse than ICE cars of similar size, because of the extra weight - so they can go thru tires 30% faster. "Increased tire wear can also contribute to air quality issues. In Oslo, Norway, where electric vehicles make two-thirds of registered vehicles but a higher proportion of traffic, the "air has unhealthy levels of microscopic particles generated partly by the abrasion of tires and asphal…

Then again, EVs often use regenerative breaking (“one pedal driving”). I have made it a habit to engage this as often as possible, avoiding to use the brakes. I wonder if this results in fewer sharp stops and is easier on the tyres. What car owners (EV or otherwise) can do to relieve their conscience is to use tyres with the smallest possible dimensions. This should reduce the amount of particle emissions from tyre a…

Smaller tyres are more revs per mile, which means more tyre wear.

https://ntwonline.com/tire-shop-talk/revolutions-per-mile-ch...

Re: Evidence mounts on toxic pollution from tires

#82
post #29

and unfortunately, EV's are worse than ICE cars of similar size, because of the extra weight - so they can go thru tires 30% faster. "Increased tire wear can also contribute to air quality issues. In Oslo, Norway, where electric vehicles make two-thirds of registered vehicles but a higher proportion of traffic, the "air has unhealthy levels of microscopic particles generated partly by the abrasion of tires and asphal…

There is usually more hydrocarbon mass in one tankful of gas than all four tires.

The tankful of gas might last 500 km; tires 100,000 km.

Re: Evidence mounts on toxic pollution from tires

#83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Then again, EVs often use regenerative breaking (“one pedal driving”). I have made it a habit to engage this as often as possible, avoiding to use the brakes. I wonder if this results in fewer sharp stops and is easier on the tyres. What car owners (EV or otherwise) can do to relieve their conscience is to use tyres with the smallest possible dimensions. This should reduce the amount of particle emissions from tyre a…

Smaller tyres are more revs per mile, which means more tyre wear. https://ntwonline.com/tire-shop-talk/revolutions-per-mile-ch...

Smaller tires are less total rubber, period. Less material thrown away when the tread is worn.

Re: Evidence mounts on toxic pollution from tires

#84
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Then again, EVs often use regenerative breaking (“one pedal driving”). I have made it a habit to engage this as often as possible, avoiding to use the brakes. I wonder if this results in fewer sharp stops and is easier on the tyres. What car owners (EV or otherwise) can do to relieve their conscience is to use tyres with the smallest possible dimensions. This should reduce the amount of particle emissions from tyre a…

> What car owners (EV or otherwise) can do to relieve their conscience is to use tyres with the smallest possible dimensions Even better would be to drive the car less and use an e-bike for most trips instead. Most bike tyres weigh less in total than the annual emissions of a set of car tyres according to the article.

If you want your shit actually not to smell, you better make it a pedal-powered bike.

With those German-made Continentals made of dandelion root, I hasten to add. (See article.)

Re: Evidence mounts on toxic pollution from tires

#86
post #72

So maybe not the best material for playgrounds.

Kids that play soccer goalie on astroturf fields (ground up tire base) have an absurdly high cancer rate. But, causation is hard to prove in court, so cancer for kids it is!

>absurdly high cancer rate

Source please.

Re: Evidence mounts on toxic pollution from tires

#87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That doesn't seem likely, F150s are built to be light and agile, as well as environmental friendly.

Basic facts don’t seem likely? Or am I just missing your sarcasm?

No he's serious. I once saw an F150 get tipped over by a light breeze.

Re: Evidence mounts on toxic pollution from tires

#88
post #71
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah because having some small passive argument is really going to change things? Yes it’s fairly obvious we need them in some situations (you carry equipment on a farm). But fixing the car problem is going to take proper activism and a greater push given it has such inertia and driving is so embedded. Not to mention corporate interests trying to preserve it.

Also, we’d need to demolish lots of buildings, including whole towns. Buildings and construction have 2x the environmental impact of cars.

No, you need buildings to live in, cars are probably not necessary for the majority of the population w good infra.

Re: Evidence mounts on toxic pollution from tires

#89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Smaller tyres are more revs per mile, which means more tyre wear. https://ntwonline.com/tire-shop-talk/revolutions-per-mile-ch...

Smaller tires are less total rubber, period. Less material thrown away when the tread is worn.

Not when you factor total miles or total revs on the tire. You cannot buy an 80,000 mile r14 tire.

Re: Evidence mounts on toxic pollution from tires

#90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But I'm 23 with no family in Amsterdam with a remote role and I get around on a bike just fine?

How did that bike get to you? How did the food get to your grocery store before you rode there? (Hint: it's not trains and boats. Go watch the traffic on a highway some time and you'll be disabused of that notion.) How did all of the transport involved in your furniture's manufacture and final delivery occur? Even if we completely got rid of passenger cars, there would still be plenty of tires on the road and there w…

> some people here say that kind of thing with no irony whatsoever

Well, if that person appears, then this would be a good reply to them. Well, actually it'd be pretty heavy-handed and unconvincing, but still. You know.

Post reply on HN