Live data from Hacker News

To build ships that break ice, U.S. must relearn to cut steel

wsj.com

111–120 of 190 posts

Re: To build ships that break ice, U.S. must relearn to cut steel

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's a lot of practical/contextual knowledge that isn't documented, and what's documented isn't guaranteed to be correct or can be misleading (terminology changes, standards change, some things are implied because they are obvious at the time, etc.)

Give some examples? That kind of 'undocumented' knowledge is lost because better tech has completely replaced it. I'm talking about inventions like the Spinning Mule or the steam engine. We have superseded them with electric motors and logic boards.

[deleted]

Re: To build ships that break ice, U.S. must relearn to cut steel

#112

Do we really need to OWN icebreakers? Maybe we could start a website where countries and companies who own icebreakers can operate them for the benefit of other countries and companies who want to use them. They just walk to the shore in the Canadian north, click the "Call Icebreaker" button on the app and wait for an icebreaker someone else owns to arrive.

> Do we really need to OWN icebreakers? Maybe we could start a website

i can't tell what is parody and whats real life

Re: To build ships that break ice, U.S. must relearn to cut steel

#113
post #91

Everybody likes to dump on Russia here but their nuclear icebreakers are something to behold: https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2022/may/worlds-m... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKaVhXn49xY

It is actually a surprising that Russia is not the manufacturing capital of the world. They have super-cheap energy, Soviet-era high-quality STEM education, and 50 million cheap workers from Caucasus, Siberia, Far East Russia, and the Central Asian countries.

[dead]

Re: To build ships that break ice, U.S. must relearn to cut steel

#114
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

OK, the who would you suggest should be the world's police? The post-WWII world order is predicated on the agreement that the age of imperialism is over and that invasion by force to annex another country is illegitimate. It is obvious that all nations do not agree to this. E.g.: China on Tibet, Taiwan, 9-dashed line, etc., Russia in Chechnya, Georgia, Ukraine. Those authoritarian states think it is perfectly fine to…

> The post-WWII world order is predicated on the agreement that the age of imperialism is over and that invasion by force to annex another country is illegitimate. Why bother with the 'annex' part when you can just overthrow governments you don't like and replace them with ones you do?

Even if that were still being done, it is obvious that the authoritarian states think annexing is very important (again, look at Chechnya, Georgia, Ukraine, Tibet, Yuhigurs, etc.). But, nice try with the false equivalency and whataboutism.

Re: To build ships that break ice, U.S. must relearn to cut steel

#115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> OK, the who would you suggest should be the world’s police? > The post-WWII world order is predicated on the agreement that the age of imperialism is over and that invasion by force to annex another country is illegitimate. If that was true, it would be inconsistent with any one nation or narrow relatively fixed set of nations being the world’s police, as that would indicate that the age of imperialism was not over…

The age of imperialism is not over, except where someone enforces it. That someone is mostly the US, but UK and France also do a lot of work that I know of. None of them are perfect, all have a lot of blood on their hands, but overall imperialism is mostly dead despite many who would turn to it if they could. In economic theory there are good reasons to say that every country has better options than imperialism - but…

> The age of imperialism is not over, except where someone enforces it. That someone is mostly the US, but UK and France also do a lot of work that I know of.

I would suggest that “the age of imperialism is over only to the extent that what were among the last of the great imperial powers enforce that condition” is absolutely no different than “the age of imperialism continues, under some of the same imperial powers as its most recent previous form”.

Re: To build ships that break ice, U.S. must relearn to cut steel

#116

Do we really need to OWN icebreakers? Maybe we could start a website where countries and companies who own icebreakers can operate them for the benefit of other countries and companies who want to use them. They just walk to the shore in the Canadian north, click the "Call Icebreaker" button on the app and wait for an icebreaker someone else owns to arrive.

> Do we really need to OWN icebreakers? Maybe we could start a website i can't tell what is parody and whats real life

Anyone interested in angel investing for my startup? It's like Uber, but for $50-100 million specialty ships of which there are only a handful in the world, owned and operated by only a few nations, one of which is currently sanctioned by the US government.

Move fast and break ice!

Re: To build ships that break ice, U.S. must relearn to cut steel

#117
post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is actually a surprising that Russia is not the manufacturing capital of the world. They have super-cheap energy, Soviet-era high-quality STEM education, and 50 million cheap workers from Caucasus, Siberia, Far East Russia, and the Central Asian countries.

And a very corrupted government and no rule of law. China is also corrupted, but the level of corruption in Russia is on a different level. Also declining population and worsening education. There is a statistically significant correlation between the level of corruption and economic growth: https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-rep... Putin has dismantled most of the check and balances in the syst…

> And a very corrupted government and no rule of law.

Claim without evidence. Let’s throw in a bit of whataboutism- have you seen how improbably good pelosi’s stock market trades are? Almost like she’s insider trading.

> Also declining population and worsening education.

Population seems to be more or less in line with the rest of the world, and likely better once you factor for immigration.

“In 2014 the Pearson/Economist Intelligence Unit rated Russia's education as the 8th-best in Europe and the 13th-best in the world”

“In 2016 the US company Bloomberg rated Russia's higher education as the third-best in the world”

I mean really. I get that we all have biases, but lying about such easily verifiable things is pathetic, even for the average anti-Russian propaganda shill.

Re: To build ships that break ice, U.S. must relearn to cut steel

#118
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But then market pressures for efficiency will lead to mergers and acquisitions...

Versus being quite literally held hostage by a non-cooperating foreign power for political gain? Things like energy independence sound cute and quaint until you find yourself being taken advantage of at best, or ground to a halt during armed conflict at worst.

Can't we all just get along...

Re: To build ships that break ice, U.S. must relearn to cut steel

#119
post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is actually a surprising that Russia is not the manufacturing capital of the world. They have super-cheap energy, Soviet-era high-quality STEM education, and 50 million cheap workers from Caucasus, Siberia, Far East Russia, and the Central Asian countries.

Russia is still structured as an empire, though the fraction of ethnic Russians is relatively high, historically speaking. That, together with its large size, requires a large section of the economy be slaved to the security sector. Frankly, Russia as a Chinese suzerainty might be one of the more productive alignments for the global economy, even if it isn’t great for America.

I knew I'd be able to bait you out of hiding with my comment. The handful of resident anti-Russian zealots on here are so predicable.

I mean goodness, can we just admire a cool boat for a second?

Re: To build ships that break ice, U.S. must relearn to cut steel

#120
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A boat you could carry couldn’t break ice.

depends how hard you throw it

If you are a human you cannot break significant ice by throwing. Sure you can break 1cm of ice, but so any any other boat. We need ice breakers because there are cases where the ice is probably strong enough to support a the heaviest truck, but it doesn't quite have enough margin of safety on that probably to actually drive a truck so if you want to get through you need to send a boat through water.
Post reply on HN