Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: How to do literal web searches after Google destroyed the “ ” feature?

news.ycombinator.com

101–110 of 219 posts

Re: Ask HN: How to do literal web searches after Google destroyed the “ ” feature?

#101

Kagi. Never have I been so happy to send someone $10 every month. When you become the customer, not the product, it’s amazing what can happen.

This.

Kagi is incredible and worth every penny simply for being able to remove the SEO scam and tire fire that is Pinterest from all image search results.

Re: Ask HN: How to do literal web searches after Google destroyed the “ ” feature?

#102
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Duck Duck Go has similar problems for me. It's also recently started sometimes ignoring the "-" when you try to exclude a word.

I think the "-" is case-sensitive sometimes. So if you write "-honey" it'll still return "Honey" results, so you have to write "-honey -Honey".

No, it just doesn't work at all. Search /r/duckduckgo for "- operator" to see tons of threads.

Re: Ask HN: How to do literal web searches after Google destroyed the “ ” feature?

#103

Use Bing? I've found for code/error message snippets in particular Bing is often better, while Google will incorrectly guess I mean some related but different thing and serve the wrong results.

Doesn't seem to work. Search for "internal engine" and see most results talk about internal combustion engine. By contrast, Google with Verbatim option returns only results with the exact phrase "internal engine".

Re: Ask HN: How to do literal web searches after Google destroyed the “ ” feature?

#105
Piracy has basically been purged from google. Duckduckgo isn't much better, since it's Bing on the backend.

Instead, use Yandex. It returns direct relevant hits and just bloody works. And if you're in the USA, you're also shielded by the fact that Yandex wont share your searched etc with the USG. You know, being a Russian search engine :)

Re: Ask HN: How to do literal web searches after Google destroyed the “ ” feature?

#106
post #60

Kagi. Never have I been so happy to send someone $10 every month. When you become the customer, not the product, it’s amazing what can happen.

Weird question that I have that I'd love anyone who makes a Kagi account to trial after reading the parent comment to answer: When you make your account, you're given the option to customize. When you do, you can pick things like color theme and how URLs are displayed. On the right hand side of the page there is a preview of what your Kagi searches will look like. In my example, the demo Kagi search is Magic The Gath…

Vlad here, Kagi founder. Also an avid MTG player. I came up with the idea for that preview.

Re: Ask HN: How to do literal web searches after Google destroyed the “ ” feature?

#107

Kagi. Never have I been so happy to send someone $10 every month. When you become the customer, not the product, it’s amazing what can happen.

Being logged in while making search queries in search engines poses significant privacy risks. The searches can paint a comprehensive profile of the user, and these data often remain stored for extended periods. There's a chance this information might be shared with third parties. Coupled with other user data, these logged-in searches can pave the way for targeted advertising, sophisticated predictive analysis, and potential exploitation by governments or malicious entities. In the event of data breaches, the user's logged-in search histories can be exposed. Furthermore, users typically don't have clear insight into how their data is utilized when logged in.

I hope Kagi introduces an anonymous access feature. For instance, it could incorporate zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs). These are cryptographic techniques where one party (the prover) can confirm to another (the verifier) that a claim is accurate without disclosing any additional information. This is especially beneficial for authentication scenarios where it's essential to avoid sharing extra details.

To implement zero-knowledge authentication for quota API access:

1. Token Creation:

- Each month, users receive a token tied to their identity and quota.

- The token can be split for use on multiple devices using cryptographic methods.

2. API Access:

- Clients present a zero-knowledge proof (ZKP) to confirm they have a valid token and haven't used up their quota. The server verifies this without seeing the exact details.

3. Client Synchronization:

- Each client tracks its quota usage.

- Synchronization can be peer-to-peer or through a centralized, encrypted server to prevent double spending of the quota.

4. Quota Renewal:

- Monthly, old tokens expire, and new tokens are issued.

Challenges:

- ZKPs can be resource-intensive.

- Token security is crucial; there should be a way to handle lost or compromised tokens.

- The system should prevent quota "double-spending" across devices.

- If a centralized server is used for synchronization, it should operate with encrypted data.

This way Kagi would only know who their customers are but not what kind of searches they make.

Re: Ask HN: How to do literal web searches after Google destroyed the “ ” feature?

#108

> Google """"improved"""" it last year Google's done a lot of "improvements". I hate to say it but its quote feature has been broken for a decade. You're only now noticing? I've tried using other search engines. I've settled on DuckDuckGo. It also does not have a working literal-quote feature. But it's much less infested with SEO garbage.

I switched to DDG because Google broke literal quotes years ago (then fixed it, and broke it again?). Now its broken on DDG. Considering Kagi.

Re: Ask HN: How to do literal web searches after Google destroyed the “ ” feature?

#109
post #14

You have to use a special "verbatim" search product from Google, it isn't the main search box anymore. Look under Advanced or something.

First of all, wow. It's there (under Tools, you don't even need to go to Advanced), it works, and yet I've never once seen anybody talk about that feature's existence on HN until now. And people have been complaining about not being able to do verbatim searches for years and years here on HN. Second, I just looked up when this feature was introduced (assuming it was fairly new), and it was in... November 2011 . It's…

There's been lots of talk about it over the years: https://www.google.com/search?q=google+%22verbatim%22+site%3...

I think I also mentioned it a couple of times when the same complaint came up.

The problem I think is that "verbatim" is not a word that one thinks of, so nobody searches for that. Plus it's hidden in a generic "Tools" menu. Sometime you get a link to search for the exact phrase at the bottom of results, but that too is subtle.

Re: Ask HN: How to do literal web searches after Google destroyed the “ ” feature?

#110
post #38

Can you give an example? Searching for "news.ycombinator.com" works just fine for me. No unrelated content.

Knowing Google, it's gaslighting you^W^W guessing that you actually meant to type the quotes for that one search.
Post reply on HN