Earlier quoted context omitted.
This may be a UX/Visual issue, but how is it a usability issue?
It breaks discoverability by executing its action /during discovery/. Imagine if you, using a new web browser, clicked on the "File" menu to see what was there and instead of dropping down a menu, it opened a file browser. In the end not a life-changing or permanent problem, but bad usability problem. Also, usability is a subset of UX.
Codename: Svbtle by Dustin Curtis
121–130 of 164 posts
Re: Codename: Svbtle by Dustin Curtis
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
2. Svbtle: There are few names I've come across in my career that are as painful as this one to read, spell or pronounce. Absolutely. I thought that "kiln" was a horrible product name (it still is) but we've set the bar lower with this.
I think Kiln is a brilliant product name for what it is: a source code repo (kilns are designed to hold quantities of things) that encourages peer review (kilns dry or harden things).
Re: Codename: Svbtle by Dustin Curtis
#123Sidenote: The judos thing is annoying and the design is mad plain.
Re: Codename: Svbtle by Dustin Curtis
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a dark pattern. In my opinion, at least; an ambiguous interface element with unexpected and unintended consequences. Judging by his obvious design talent, I think Mr. Curtis should know better, especially in light of the incredibly negative response. It's a dick move. You care enough to follow through with replying to me, it seems. I'm plenty relaxed, I just thought it was worth calling a spade a spade in this c…
Except it doesn't actually have consequences.
Re: Codename: Svbtle by Dustin Curtis
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
The last part of humans.txt is supposed to list the technology used.
doesn't look like it http://humanstxt.org/humans.txt looks more like the tools, not the tech stack.
Re: Codename: Svbtle by Dustin Curtis
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
If your other goals were to be arrogant and elitist, you've accomplished them as well.
Maybe because in Venezuela we are bombarded with propaganda everyday about how terrible meritocracy is, it bothers me to see this sentiment here. As geeks, don't we recognize that The Deck ads are better than Google AdWords? Isn't the MacBook Air currently better than probably any other laptop? Wasn't Gmail the best thing since sliced bread for a long time? I get it that it's part of the script in a socialist revolut…
Ah, but there's the rub: Dustin doesn't have a great product and he isn't right. At best he's a good marketer: the only things he ever stands out for are his gimmicks. His best posts were gimmick posts ("watch me redesign airport passes!", "let me show you how stupid commercial graphic designers are!"); his only creations are good marketing creations ("you should follow me on Twitter here", "kudos!"). Occasionally I've seen him get halfway towards having a decent thought, but I've never seen him follow through.
Compare that to John Gruber, who's talked before about how he painstakingly selected the Daring Fireball color before he launched his blog (which has displayed his thoughts, gimmickless and unchanged, for a decade now). Greatness is a matter of finding big ideas and sticking to them; the only thing Dustin's stuck to in the few years he's been promoting himself is that people ought to remember him. But he's forgotten to create something worth remembering.
Curtis writes:
> One of my main goals for this new writing interface was to encourage myself to spend more time writing and less time presenting.
Which is admirable, and I've noticed that his writing in this new iteration is somewhat less surface-irritating. But he contradicts this in this very thread, when he says of his jackass slogan: "It perfectly accomplishes my goal: you'll remember it." He cares about being remembered; it never seems to occur to him that there's more to writing good things than making them memorable.
Re: Codename: Svbtle by Dustin Curtis
#127Re: Codename: Svbtle by Dustin Curtis
#128Earlier quoted context omitted.
It breaks discoverability by executing its action /during discovery/. Imagine if you, using a new web browser, clicked on the "File" menu to see what was there and instead of dropping down a menu, it opened a file browser. In the end not a life-changing or permanent problem, but bad usability problem. Also, usability is a subset of UX.
I would agree with you, but this is a blog. You're taking it too seriously.
Re: Codename: Svbtle by Dustin Curtis
#129Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's easy to call it a meaningless interaction, but it's far from meaningless. He's explicitly breaking an implicit trust between himself and the reader. He's saying "Hey reader, I'm watching you." If you don't think this is a big deal, I invite you to think about a natural extension of this concept: A comment form that sends its entire contents to the server on every keypress.
I wonder how many already do that....
Re: Codename: Svbtle by Dustin Curtis
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
I laughed as well, but because I thought it was a fantastic move. The entire design is a brand, and by not opening it up to everybody, it will create the desire to be on the "in crowd." Arrogant? Hardly. Brilliant? Definitely.
Using exclusivity to market things is a novel concept?