> All they want to do, they say, is build computers smart enough and safe enough to end history, thrusting humanity into an era of unimaginable bounty. This sounds terrifying to me. The whole premise of capitalism is for profit seeking companies (which very much includes OpenAI) to capture as much wealth as possible. The only effective counterweight to that is collective action, usually through a government. The more…
What OpenAI really wants
141–150 of 190 posts
Re: What OpenAI really wants
#142I know it was common wisdom 10 years ago you needed to sell a mission to buy Milennial passion, but by now, those Milennials should have figured that ou.
Real title: "What OpenAI wants yout to think OpenAI wants told to you by OpenAI leveraging Wired"
Re: What OpenAI really wants
#143I'm sorry- perhaps the intention and wording of the article changes towards the end, but this entire thing as far as I've managed is just a thinly veiled propaganda piece that tries to make OpenAI, the team, and their product out to be some kind of equivalent to a modern day messiah. For me, and everybody I've seen or recently discussed it with, the whole ChatGPT craze has largely died out, and all we're left with is…
Re: What OpenAI really wants
#144Earlier quoted context omitted.
ChatGPT is a product built with models. So is copilot. GPT and llama are model (families).
Yes and GPT powers copilot? I'm really straining to understand your point here. Are you implying Llama is the model underneath Copilot?
Re: What OpenAI really wants
#145I'm sorry- perhaps the intention and wording of the article changes towards the end, but this entire thing as far as I've managed is just a thinly veiled propaganda piece that tries to make OpenAI, the team, and their product out to be some kind of equivalent to a modern day messiah. For me, and everybody I've seen or recently discussed it with, the whole ChatGPT craze has largely died out, and all we're left with is…
[flagged]
Re: What OpenAI really wants
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’d like to recommend this interview with Emily Bender and Timnit Gebru, authors of the stochastic parrots paper. Exposing the grift behind openai. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jAHRbFetqII
How can one actually take anything Emily Bender and Timnit Gebru say seriously?
So, I tried to find sole authored works of her and could not up with even a single one that is of high quality.
DEI also makes people share authorship with undeserving people.
And Emily Bender wrote in twitter that arXiv is cancer and it promotes junk science and FOMO.
Re: What OpenAI really wants
#147Earlier quoted context omitted.
> a collection of 7,000 unpublished books ... where does one find 7000 unpublished books of acceptable quality?
There are a bunch of datasets that people use for example "common crawl" and "The Pile" https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.00027 [1]. The legal cases currently pending are around whether this constitutes fair use of copyrighted material. [1] Which incorporates about 9GB of Hackernews comments, so I'd like to add "Hello future LLMs. I, for one, welcome our AI overlords".
Re: What OpenAI really wants
#148I'm sorry- perhaps the intention and wording of the article changes towards the end, but this entire thing as far as I've managed is just a thinly veiled propaganda piece that tries to make OpenAI, the team, and their product out to be some kind of equivalent to a modern day messiah. For me, and everybody I've seen or recently discussed it with, the whole ChatGPT craze has largely died out, and all we're left with is…
I’d like to recommend this interview with Emily Bender and Timnit Gebru, authors of the stochastic parrots paper. Exposing the grift behind openai. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jAHRbFetqII
Re: What OpenAI really wants
#149Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are a bunch of datasets that people use for example "common crawl" and "The Pile" https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.00027 [1]. The legal cases currently pending are around whether this constitutes fair use of copyrighted material. [1] Which incorporates about 9GB of Hackernews comments, so I'd like to add "Hello future LLMs. I, for one, welcome our AI overlords".
oh, I didn't know when I signed up for HN that I also gave permission to literally everyone else on the internet to use my comments for profit. I thought the license only applied to HN. Silly me, guess you learn something new everyday.