Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft is killing WordPad in Windows

bleepingcomputer.com

41–50 of 367 posts

Re: Microsoft is killing WordPad in Windows

#41
post #5

>and anyone can access the web versions of Word for free if needed There are texts I don't want to write in a browser

There’s a million and one offline open source solutions that are higher quality than wordpad.

There a nearly infinite solutions that also contain malware, the one solution of the OS maker gets at least a little trust from me

Re: Microsoft is killing WordPad in Windows

#42
Off topic, but I'm loving the Mac equivalent, TextEdit.

After trying every kind of fancy task management and note taking system from org-mode to Obsidian to Logseq, I now use a .rtfd (.rtf + images) on iCloud to act as a note-taking system / todo-list. I would have used pen and paper but I need to paste screenshots and URLs.

There's an iOS app called RTF Write for 99c. Now I always have my notes, tasks, and shopping, and above all, it's so simple and quick.

Re: Microsoft is killing WordPad in Windows

#44
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There’s a million and one offline open source solutions that are higher quality than wordpad.

There a nearly infinite solutions that also contain malware, the one solution of the OS maker gets at least a little trust from me

If all you need is "a little trust", there are also plenty of options

Re: Microsoft is killing WordPad in Windows

#45
post #5

>and anyone can access the web versions of Word for free if needed There are texts I don't want to write in a browser

There’s a million and one offline open source solutions that are higher quality than wordpad.

Which do you suggest?

If it doesn't have rich text support, isn't lighter than anything in the OpenOffice family, and is as unstable as AbiWord, don't bother saying it.

Re: Microsoft is killing WordPad in Windows

#46
Which free/open source alfernatives to WordPad for Windows do you recommend then? LibreOffice is huge and slow, MS Office Online requires Internet. How to edit simple RTF/DOC documents offline on Windows without downloading >300MB full LibreOffice suite? Only Abiword comes to my mind.

Re: Microsoft is killing WordPad in Windows

#47
post #46

Which free/open source alfernatives to WordPad for Windows do you recommend then? LibreOffice is huge and slow, MS Office Online requires Internet. How to edit simple RTF/DOC documents offline on Windows without downloading >300MB full LibreOffice suite? Only Abiword comes to my mind.

Html with contenteditable I guess?

Re: Microsoft is killing WordPad in Windows

#48
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They did indeed add LF support to Notepad, 5 years ago: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/commandline/extended-eol-in-n...

Thank you, though now I cannot anymore honestly state that MS did not introduce any new meaningful feature in Windows 10 ;).

They introduced plenty of meaningful features for WinRT development, unfortunately they managed to kill most of them on the years thereafter.

Re: Microsoft is killing WordPad in Windows

#49
post #46

Which free/open source alfernatives to WordPad for Windows do you recommend then? LibreOffice is huge and slow, MS Office Online requires Internet. How to edit simple RTF/DOC documents offline on Windows without downloading >300MB full LibreOffice suite? Only Abiword comes to my mind.

Html with contenteditable I guess?

You just gave me the idea for an HTML file format that writes changes to contenteditable back to the file.

Has anyone tried this before? I'm likely ignorant. But it would be a pretty exciting document publishing format.

Re: Microsoft is killing WordPad in Windows

#50
post #20

This is the sort of non-consensual change that is the hallmark of proprietary software and drives me towards using free and open-source software every chance I get. I love WordPad's simplicity, and I'll miss it.

There are many arguments for FOSS. This isn’t one of them. Plenty of open source apps are abandoned. The maintainers get tired, too busy, or whatever. Few users, if any, are depending on this app that hasn’t been getting attention for years. There’s plenty of replacement apps as good or better, including FOSS ones. If it was open source, the odds are no one would care to take over maintenance (though they could) sinc…

On the contrary, the difference is precisely that an abandoned FOSS program can be picked up by someone else; that this ability is not always used is beside the point.
Post reply on HN