Live data from Hacker News

How to Apologize

philomousos.blogspot.com

91–100 of 179 posts

Re: How to Apologize

#91

If people need a guide for an apology then I would question it's sincerity.

I don't. You can be really sorry, but have a hard time finding the words to say it.

You can also be really sorry, and have an easy time finding the wrong words to say it. It's a shame that being sincere and sounding sincere are so weakly correlated, while our monkey brains have us so convinced that they are strongly correlated.

Re: How to Apologize

#92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> However, that opinion is wrong. You should stop having it, and if you express it at work you will and should be fired. I think this opinion is wrong. If one expresses his opinion about slavery, he should not be fired. Now that you had this wrong opinion about opinions, should you be fired? From work? From Hacker News? Anywhere?

While I generally subscribe to the Utopian ideal that good ideas should be able to triumph over bad ideas by virtue alone, there are probably both times where it is inappropriate and appropriate for someones opinions and beliefs to be relevant to their employment. Scenario A, normal job, no customer interaction, non-manager, but an irrepressibly talkative fellow. Likes to talk to his co-workers about how awesome slav…

A: That guy is not pleasant to work with and needs management. I've worked with people who were like him, but their subject of choice was WoW.

B: Either he's capable of keeping his eccentric views to himself when dealing with customers or he's not. Whether it's supporting slavery or Bush 43, he can ruin a business relationship by expressing that view at the wrong time.

C: Again, he needs management. Does his view negatively affect his capability as a manager? What if he's an evangelical Christian and he has gay underlings?

Re: How to Apologize

#93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

While I generally subscribe to the Utopian ideal that good ideas should be able to triumph over bad ideas by virtue alone, there are probably both times where it is inappropriate and appropriate for someones opinions and beliefs to be relevant to their employment. Scenario A, normal job, no customer interaction, non-manager, but an irrepressibly talkative fellow. Likes to talk to his co-workers about how awesome slav…

A more relevant and recent example is whether you support software patents. Those opposed to them rail against those in favor of them pretty hard. Some are now making hiring decisions based upon that. Should I not be allowed to express my views on software patents simply because you don't agree with them? You'd like to paint it as a black & white issue, but I don't see it that way. Sorry for the liberal use of pronou…

You did a very good job of illustrating the slippery slope that we open up when policing ideas and the issue being where do we drawn the line.

Re: How to Apologize

#94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, that quote is out-of-context to the point of disingenuousness. Women are listed as one of the "great perks" that (male?) attendees can enjoy: https://img.skitch.com/20120320-fmsc5mciy8e7n3nxhakmegxxg9.p...

Ah, Thank you! That definitely brings a lot more context into it and I can see how some may get offended by it. I still question whether this is offensive to myself. Compared to the ads I hear on the radio and TV for local clubs and bars and how they're touting their female attendance or "hot bar tenders" as a reason to come, this seems relatively tame to that...

Just because sexism exists elsewhere, doesn't make it any less sexist though, does it?

Re: How to Apologize

#95
This is pretty close to the apology model as it was told to me via leadership/management training at one of my previous employers.

It works amazingly well in practice. Basically, people appreciate when you're honest about your mistakes because they make them too. I've had more than one of my engineers say that they respected me more by admitting fault.

And for those that don't appreciate the honesty? Well, you can't please everyone. I just don't worry about them because there are too few hours in the day to care about it.

Re: How to Apologize

#96
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

but I don't think wanting women around a sausage fest is sexist. It's being male. Sure, that's being (heterosexual) male, but you are making the same assumption as the original event-planners did: all of our attendees will be male. There is nothing in the subject material of the event (their API discussion or whatever) that would interest a female. This is the thinking that strikes me as sexist: all developers are ma…

How would you make it appealing to women?

Mostly by not doing things like hiring a bunch of women to serve beer and listing it as a perk. It's then appealing to anyone interested in the topic, regardless of anything.

Just don't do things that explicitly cater to "FOO" if your intentions are not to explicitly cater to group "FOO", particularly if those things include offering up people of group "BAR" as an incentive to come.

Should you do things to make your hackathon appealing to programmers? Yes. These things are food, drinks, subject matter/activities and socialization with other programmers. Food and drinks appeal to humans, and you don't want a bunch of people having heatstrokes or diabetic comas. Subject matter/activities and other programmers being there to socialize with appeal to programmers. Pretty much all programmers who would want to attend a hackathon.

Re: How to Apologize

#97
"We're sorry we inferred that only female tenders would be there to service you. Male tenders will be there to serve beer, also. We want you to focus on code, so whatever you need, just let us know and we'll help you get there (within reason, of course..)"

Re: How to Apologize

#98
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

but I don't think wanting women around a sausage fest is sexist. It's being male. Sure, that's being (heterosexual) male, but you are making the same assumption as the original event-planners did: all of our attendees will be male. There is nothing in the subject material of the event (their API discussion or whatever) that would interest a female. This is the thinking that strikes me as sexist: all developers are ma…

How would you make it appealing to women?

Actually, this is one of the things that is so sad about this case - they had already taken a number of steps to get away from the classic hack-a-thon stereotype of a bunch of sweaty fat geeks eating pizza. They were putting on quality food (including, apparently, chocolate and cupcakes, which I would suggest, have quite strong female appeal - not to, you know, stereotype...). They also offer massages and gym passes, which I think extend the appeal of the event outside the traditional geek stereotype in a way that suggests 'women welcome'.....

... right up until the line where they suggest that having female serving staff bring you beer while you code is another perk, on the same level as those others. At which point you reassess the massages and gym-passes in the context of this new information and realise that there might be a totally different vibe to this event than the cupcakes-and-chocolate-with-access-to-a-gym-to-burn-off-the-excess-calories-and-a-nice-massage-at-the-end-of-the-day a female coder might have, up until that point, been imagining...

Seriously, take out the sexism, and I think they were well on their way to figuring out the recipe for creating an event with cross-gender appeal.

Re: How to Apologize

#99
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> but the root problem is the sexism, not the ad copy. I agree it was a very sexist thing to write. It makes me wonder though: 1. Which is worse, hiring an all female serving staff (perhaps wearing uniforms that would be considered particularly attractive to heterosexual males), or acknowledging that you have done this by writing about it in your invitations? Is it inappropriate (always and everywhere) to hire only a…

FYI, there is an upscale restaurant where I go regularly for lunch that has only attractive women. (Not Hooters)

There is a difference between a hackathon and a restaurant. There are actually restaurants that hire very good looking men also because they are going for a certain clientele. Sexuality sells a lot of things, but that's hormones and money.

The problem here is that a goodly chunk of people expect the clientele of a hackathon to be developers. Developers are men and women who are professional. As much as sexuality sells beer, food, cars, etc., it is not a accepted selling point of professionals. Rather, it will get you in serious trouble in many professional environments.

Now, it is revealed that this company's fantasy event is programming while being served beer by hot women. This basically puts them in the frat with a big no hire for women.

Re: How to Apologize

#100
post #9

"Women: Need another beer? Let one of our friendly (female) event staff get that for you." I suppose it varies with culture, but I can't imagine any of the women I know getting upset about that line. So a genuine question, are we getting to a point where you need to think so much before actually saying anything? Personally, even if I were the butt of a mildly racist joke I would probably enjoy the joke than be offend…

Please read the whole context: https://img.skitch.com/20120320-fmsc5mciy8e7n3nxhakmegxxg9.p... "Women" are being presented in a list of "great perks" -- along with "food trucks", "top shelf booze", and "dark chocolate". This is pretty much a textbook example of objectification. This sort of objectification and othering is part of what keeps women out of tech, and that's a loss to everyone. More women joining our comm…

Finally some context!

Without the context of the list above, I kept reading "Women:" not as a perk in a list, but as a declarative. I kept wondering why people could be offended by them saying that women were permitted beer.

Now, I see.

Post reply on HN