Wake me up when they launch The Box (tm) .
ChatGPT Enterprise
221–230 of 532 posts
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#222Well the message in this video certainly did not age well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smHw9kEwcgM TLDR: This might have just killed a LOT of startups
Haha i also thought about that Y Combinator video. Yep, their prediction didn't age well and it's becoming clear that openAI is actually a direct competitor to most of the startups that are using their api. Most "chat your own data" startups will be killed by this move.
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#223Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's exactly opposite. The entire point of an enterprise option would be that you DO train it on corporate data, securely. So the #1 feature is actually missing, yet is announced as in the works.
Coca Cola doesn’t want to train a model that can be bought by Pepsi.
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#224How can we be sure of this? Just take their word for it?
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#225Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#226Well the message in this video certainly did not age well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smHw9kEwcgM TLDR: This might have just killed a LOT of startups
Haha i also thought about that Y Combinator video. Yep, their prediction didn't age well and it's becoming clear that openAI is actually a direct competitor to most of the startups that are using their api. Most "chat your own data" startups will be killed by this move.
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#227Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think you missed this part: ChatGPT Enterprise is also SOC 2 compliant and all conversations are encrypted in transit and at rest. Our new admin console lets you manage team members easily and offers domain verification, SSO, and usage insights, allowing for large-scale deployment into enterprise. I think this will have a solid product-market-fit. The product (ChatGPT) was ready but not enterprise. Now it is. They…
“all conversations are encrypted … at rest” - why do conversations even need to _exist_ at rest? Seems sus to me
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#228> The 80% statistic refers to the percentage of Fortune 500 companies with registered ChatGPT accounts, as determined by accounts associated with corporate email domains. Yeah... I have no doubt that people at my Fortune 100 company tried it out with their corporate email domains. We have about 80,000 employees, so it seems nearly impossible that somebody wouldn't have tried it. But, since then the policy has come do…
Want about locally running LLM?
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#229Earlier quoted context omitted.
When I first started working with GPT I was disappointed in this. I thought like the previous commentor that I could fine tune by adding documents and it would add it to the "knowledge" of GPT. Instead I had to do what you suggest is vector similarity search, and add the relevant text to the prompt. I do think an open line of research is some way for users to just add arbitrary docs in an easy way to the LLM.
Yes, this would definitely be a game changer for almost all companies. Considering how huge the market is, I guess it's pretty difficult to do, or it would be done already. I certainly don't expect a nice drag-and-drop interface to put my Office files and then ask questions about it coming in 2023. Maybe 2024?
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#230From our discussions with enterprises (trying to sell our LLM apps platform), we quickly learned how sensitive enterprises are when it comes to sharing their data. In many of these organizations, employees are already pasting a lot of sensitive data into ChatGPT unless access to ChatGPT itself is restricted. We know a few companies that ended up deploying chatbot-ui with Azure's OpenAI offering since Azure claims to not use user's data (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/legal/cognitive-services/o...).
We ended up adding support for Azure's OpenAI offering to our platform as well as open-source our engine to support on-prem deployments (LLMStack - https://github.com/trypromptly/LLMStack) to deal with the privacy concerns these enterprises have.