Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Enterprise

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

181–190 of 532 posts

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#181

Post by caesil »

choppaface wrote: post #177
caesil wrote: post #167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're referring to a Copyright Office administrative ruling. It's a pretty strange ruling at odds with precedent, and it has not been tested in court. Traditionally all that's required for copyrightability is a "minimal creative spark", i.e. the barest evidence that some human creativity was involved in creating the work. There really hasn't traditionally been any lower bound on how "minimal" the "spark" need be --…

Not so much copyrighting generated output, it’s more about to what extent training is fair use as well as when the algo spits out an exact copy of training data.

That's a separate issue. What I linked above is an opinion specifically on whether generated output is copyrightable.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#182

Post by dangerwill »

"From engineers troubleshooting bugs, to data analysts clustering free-form data, to finance analysts writing tricky spreadsheet formulas—the use cases for ChatGPT Enterprise are plenty. It’s become a true enabler of productivity, with the dependable security and data privacy controls we need."

I'm sorry but the financial analyst using chatGPT to write their excel formulas for them, and explicitly calling out that it is generating a formula that the analyst can't figure out on their own ("tricky") is an incredibly alarming thing to call out as a use case for chatGPT. I can't think of a lower reward, higher risk task to throw chatGPT at than financial analysis / reporting. Subtle differences in how things are reported in the financial world can really matter

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#183

Post by [deleted] »

happytiger wrote: post #105

Has there been some resolution to the copyright issues that I’m no aware of? In my conversations with execs that’s been a serious concern — basically that generated output from AI systems can’t be reliably protected. I refer to the concept that output could be deemed free of copyright because they are not created by a human author, or that derivative works can be potential liabilities because they resemble works that…

[deleted]

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#184

Post by beardedwizard »

blowski wrote: post #171
dahwolf wrote: post #161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's exactly opposite. The entire point of an enterprise option would be that you DO train it on corporate data, securely. So the #1 feature is actually missing, yet is announced as in the works.

Coca Cola doesn’t want to train a model that can be bought by Pepsi.

But that's exactly the point, an enterprise offering should be able to provide guarantees like this while also allowing training - model per tenant. I think the reality is they are doing multi-tenant models which means they have no way guarantee your data won't be leaked unless they disable training altogether.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#185

Post by tempestn »

fdeage wrote: post #147
kenjackson wrote: post #136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When I first started working with GPT I was disappointed in this. I thought like the previous commentor that I could fine tune by adding documents and it would add it to the "knowledge" of GPT. Instead I had to do what you suggest is vector similarity search, and add the relevant text to the prompt. I do think an open line of research is some way for users to just add arbitrary docs in an easy way to the LLM.

Yes, this would definitely be a game changer for almost all companies. Considering how huge the market is, I guess it's pretty difficult to do, or it would be done already. I certainly don't expect a nice drag-and-drop interface to put my Office files and then ask questions about it coming in 2023. Maybe 2024?

That would be the absolute game-changer. Something with the "intelligence" of GPT-4, but it knows the contents of all your stuff - your documents, project tracker, emails, calendar, etc.

Unfortunately even if we do get this, I expect there will be significant ecosystem lock-in. Like, I imagine Microsoft is aiming for something like this, but you'd need to use all their stuff.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#186

Post by paxys »

vyrotek wrote: post #76

Any correlation between this and the sudden disappearance of this repo? https://github.com/microsoft/azurechatgpt Past discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37112741

Based on past discussion, my guess is it was removed because the name and description were wildly misleading. People starred it because it was a repo published by Microsoft called "azurechatgpt", but all it contained was a sample frontend UI for a chat bot which could talk to the OpenAI API.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#187

Post by vorticalbox »

irrational wrote: post #162

> The 80% statistic refers to the percentage of Fortune 500 companies with registered ChatGPT accounts, as determined by accounts associated with corporate email domains. Yeah... I have no doubt that people at my Fortune 100 company tried it out with their corporate email domains. We have about 80,000 employees, so it seems nearly impossible that somebody wouldn't have tried it. But, since then the policy has come do…

Want about locally running LLM?

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#188

Post by thomassmith65 »

astrange wrote: post #98
thomassmith65 wrote: post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Note that turning 'privacy' on is buried in the UI; turning it off again requires just a single click. Such dark patterns, plus their involvement in crypto, their shoddy treatment of paying users, their security incidents... make it harder for me to feel good about OpenAI spearheading the introduction of (real) AI into the world today.

They're not involved in crypto, just the CEO is.

That's an important correction. Thanks, I got a bit carried away with the comment. There's enough hearsay on the internet, and I don't want to contribute.

While we're at it, another exaggeration I made is "security incidents"; in fact, I am only aware of one.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#189

Post by vorticalbox »

distantsounds wrote: post #131
tommek4077 wrote: post #120

Do you get uncensored answers with this? Oftentimes it produces false positives for my workload, and i dont care for feedback buttons during work hours.

[flagged]

I use AI all the time for my job because why waste time writing some JsDocs, pull request etc. When LLM are so great at writing summeries?

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#190

Post by siva7 »

warthog wrote: post #159

Well the message in this video certainly did not age well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smHw9kEwcgM TLDR: This might have just killed a LOT of startups

Haha i also thought about that Y Combinator video. Yep, their prediction didn't age well and it's becoming clear that openAI is actually a direct competitor to most of the startups that are using their api. Most "chat your own data" startups will be killed by this move.
Post reply on HN