Live data from Hacker News

Italy approves 40% windfall tax on banks for 2023 as profits soar

theguardian.com

51–60 of 193 posts

Re: Italy approves 40% windfall tax on banks for 2023 as profits soar

#51
post #48
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> No one suffers from taxing windfall profits. Windfall , by definition, being unexpectedly high profits. 1. This is objectively false. Shareholders of the bank suffer, because they get less profits. This may not be a crowd that solicits a lot of sympathy, but they still exist. 2. How do you feel about VCs and startups? Their entire business model is investing in 100 companies, knowing that 99 will fail but 1 will ma…

> knowing that 99 will fail but 1 will make astronomical returns. How would this work if there were windfall taxes? the same way it works now: counterbalance losses with gains.

Right, but the windfall taxes in this case is applied on individual companies, rather than on the portfolio as a whole.

Re: Italy approves 40% windfall tax on banks for 2023 as profits soar

#52
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I would much rather see regulation forcing banks to raise interest rate on deposits Regulation that increases competition would be even better. It seems like that would be the underlying problem.

What kind of competition would you like to see in the banking sector? All banks look exactly the same from this vantage point...

Banks compete on customer service, atm networks and fees, locations, app and technology infrastructure, among other things.

Re: Italy approves 40% windfall tax on banks for 2023 as profits soar

#53

This is an old European disease. Corporate profits are often seen as an adverse result; of consumers being taken advantage of unfairly. Taxing excess profits beyond what are already high tax rates is popular amongst voters (e.g. see poll results in the UK, 2022). However, this lowers the appeal for new entrants to enter these markets to compete for these excess profits through better and more efficient products and s…

The final sentence of this comment requires at least two underlying assumptions to hold true:

1. Investors invest for speculative returns, not predictability or risk minimisation.

2. Free enterprise is possible within existing political-economic frameworks.

Re: Italy approves 40% windfall tax on banks for 2023 as profits soar

#54
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I would much rather see regulation forcing banks to raise interest rate on deposits Regulation that increases competition would be even better. It seems like that would be the underlying problem.

But what does regulation that makes it easier to start a bank look like? It seems hard to do without reducing requirements for cash on hand which, which can be a disaster.

> But what does regulation that makes it easier to start a bank look like?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narrow_banking

Re: Italy approves 40% windfall tax on banks for 2023 as profits soar

#55

This is an old European disease. Corporate profits are often seen as an adverse result; of consumers being taken advantage of unfairly. Taxing excess profits beyond what are already high tax rates is popular amongst voters (e.g. see poll results in the UK, 2022). However, this lowers the appeal for new entrants to enter these markets to compete for these excess profits through better and more efficient products and s…

I didn't think it was possible but banking shills apparently exist > If one wants free enterprise and reap its benefits who wants this from banking??? > one has to allow high profits for companies and see if competition takes care of the "problem" ah, yes - we've seen this work so many times before!

[deleted]

Re: Italy approves 40% windfall tax on banks for 2023 as profits soar

#56
post #10
post #6

I dislike banks as much as anyone else. But does it bother anyone else to see rules changed around? Wouldn't it be a better approach to tell people/corporations how they're gonna be taxed?

It does not bother me. But I think there should be a min/max for how much wealth a person has. No one suffers from taxing windfall profits. Windfall , by definition, being unexpectedly high profits.

>Windfall , by definition, being unexpectedly high profits. reply

Just because it's called a windfall tax does not mean it only effects windfalls. This is really just a "surprise extra tax". Plenty of people said that rising interest rates would mean more risk but also more profit for banks. Now they have taken the risk they're being told the profit is not theirs...

Re: Italy approves 40% windfall tax on banks for 2023 as profits soar

#57

This is an old European disease. Corporate profits are often seen as an adverse result; of consumers being taken advantage of unfairly. Taxing excess profits beyond what are already high tax rates is popular amongst voters (e.g. see poll results in the UK, 2022). However, this lowers the appeal for new entrants to enter these markets to compete for these excess profits through better and more efficient products and s…

> If one wants free enterprise and reap its benefits one has to allow high profits for companies and see if competition takes care of the "problem".

Banks will do just the same that all megacorps do: buy up their competitors with all the excess profit to make even more profit.

Re: Italy approves 40% windfall tax on banks for 2023 as profits soar

#58

This is an old European disease. Corporate profits are often seen as an adverse result; of consumers being taken advantage of unfairly. Taxing excess profits beyond what are already high tax rates is popular amongst voters (e.g. see poll results in the UK, 2022). However, this lowers the appeal for new entrants to enter these markets to compete for these excess profits through better and more efficient products and s…

If banks would be forced to choose between:

1- Windfall tax 2- Elimination of banking license regulations

What do you think would be their choice?

They would choose (3) "pay money to lobby for none of the above" and instead lobby congressmen/deputies, to eliminate this question

Re: Italy approves 40% windfall tax on banks for 2023 as profits soar

#59

This is an old European disease. Corporate profits are often seen as an adverse result; of consumers being taken advantage of unfairly. Taxing excess profits beyond what are already high tax rates is popular amongst voters (e.g. see poll results in the UK, 2022). However, this lowers the appeal for new entrants to enter these markets to compete for these excess profits through better and more efficient products and s…

Your assumption, that if without these extra taxes, more banks would be created and the industry would become less concentrated, seems untrue. The banking industry seems to be becoming hugely concentrated in every Western country, regardless of windfall taxes.

Thanks to excessive regulation

Re: Italy approves 40% windfall tax on banks for 2023 as profits soar

#60
post #24

This is an old European disease. Corporate profits are often seen as an adverse result; of consumers being taken advantage of unfairly. Taxing excess profits beyond what are already high tax rates is popular amongst voters (e.g. see poll results in the UK, 2022). However, this lowers the appeal for new entrants to enter these markets to compete for these excess profits through better and more efficient products and s…

> see if competition takes care of the "problem". We have seen: for industries with big capital requirements or heavy regulatory frameworks (enacted for everyone's safety), it just doesn't .

Which industries with big capital requirements don't have competitors?
Post reply on HN