> Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai was awarded compensation worth more than $225 million in 2022 I know this has been discussed here and 225MM is like the salary of 1000 employees making 200K for only one year, it is stock which is volatoile, that the salary of a CEO is impossible to measure, bla bla bla. But holy guacamole, whatever is the angle I look at it 225MM pear year does not make any f_ing sense to me and it is si…
The claim is that you want the CEO to be aligned with the shareholders, and therefore you incentivize them with high salaries. Who cares about future shareholders or consequences for that matter when you earn 225MM ? Go move to some country that doesn't tax capital gains, sell it all, and live on 4% of it, which is 9MM per year; live like a king, buy absurd amounts of land and multiply your passive income. Obscene is…
CEOs’ pay climbed before layoffs at tech giants like Alphabet and Microsoft
51–60 of 357 posts
Re: CEOs’ pay climbed before layoffs at tech giants like Alphabet and Microsoft
#52I know for a fact that people in the Csuite of medium size companies can easily make 400k/month total comp (specifically if they’re public companies, but private companies have outrageous paychecks also). Not even talking about the CEO, and not even talking about FAANGs and similar companies. Chances are that the leadership team of your company is making an absurd amount of money.
Re: CEOs’ pay climbed before layoffs at tech giants like Alphabet and Microsoft
#53> Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai was awarded compensation worth more than $225 million in 2022 I know this has been discussed here and 225MM is like the salary of 1000 employees making 200K for only one year, it is stock which is volatoile, that the salary of a CEO is impossible to measure, bla bla bla. But holy guacamole, whatever is the angle I look at it 225MM pear year does not make any f_ing sense to me and it is si…
Re: CEOs’ pay climbed before layoffs at tech giants like Alphabet and Microsoft
#54This isn't really a surprise. We've created a society that depends on growth. CEOs sign up for a job where they're responsible for growing a company, so they're obviously the type to value growth and want more for themsleves too – there's not a lot of CEOs who do it out of the goodness of their hearts. The investors, from the board down to individual nameless shareholders, all demand more money every quarter... even…
The treadmill is entirely opt-in. Why do you participate? Your profile says that you are a founder.
(I also don't think it's opt-in. If everyone around you makes more money and you don't, you have decreasing buying power. You need to grow just to stay neutral.)
Re: CEOs’ pay climbed before layoffs at tech giants like Alphabet and Microsoft
#55CEOs pay is tied to the stock price. They will do whatever it takes to boost the stock price, until they are out with a golden parachute. From their perspective, the business is all about boosting the stock price. It doesn't matter if the boost comes from innovation, or from polluting the planet, or from unscrupulous addictive practices, or from culling the employees. Employees are merely, an often undesired, side-ef…
I disagree with pretty much everything you say except this. >Employees are merely, an often undesired, side-effect in the business of boosting stock prices. Employees are worse than a side effect, they're a cost center to be avoided if possible. You want to achieve your goals with as few employees as possible.
Re: CEOs’ pay climbed before layoffs at tech giants like Alphabet and Microsoft
#56The less it's regulated, the more it opens the road to planned economy or tightly managed socialism.
I'm glad I live in Europe. At least I can just retreat from this system with welfare and still eat and have a roof.
Every time alternatives to capitalism are brought up, every time people come and say Stalin was worst than Hitler. It's impossible to discuss change or alternatives.
Re: CEOs’ pay climbed before layoffs at tech giants like Alphabet and Microsoft
#57> Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai was awarded compensation worth more than $225 million in 2022 I know this has been discussed here and 225MM is like the salary of 1000 employees making 200K for only one year, it is stock which is volatoile, that the salary of a CEO is impossible to measure, bla bla bla. But holy guacamole, whatever is the angle I look at it 225MM pear year does not make any f_ing sense to me and it is si…
Re: CEOs’ pay climbed before layoffs at tech giants like Alphabet and Microsoft
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
The claim is that you want the CEO to be aligned with the shareholders, and therefore you incentivize them with high salaries. Who cares about future shareholders or consequences for that matter when you earn 225MM ? Go move to some country that doesn't tax capital gains, sell it all, and live on 4% of it, which is 9MM per year; live like a king, buy absurd amounts of land and multiply your passive income. Obscene is…
You can't move countries to avoid capital gains.
Not sure on details myself. It has to be done just right.
I believe Ireland and the Netherlands are often host countries.
Now this is different than money laundering, which is big time illegal, of course.
Re: CEOs’ pay climbed before layoffs at tech giants like Alphabet and Microsoft
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
Concurred but... Let's imagine that shareholders agree on a 5 year return on capital plan. Now let's say some missteps/economic circumstances make revenue go down in the 4th year. The CEO will get heat from the investors. This is especially true if the board contains an investor representative who can vote the CEO out. What choice does the CEO have at that time but to boost short term? Look at the same story from an…
Exactly. It's more accurate to say "we look at long term as long as the short term stock price also looks good".
Re: CEOs’ pay climbed before layoffs at tech giants like Alphabet and Microsoft
#60> Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai was awarded compensation worth more than $225 million in 2022 I know this has been discussed here and 225MM is like the salary of 1000 employees making 200K for only one year, it is stock which is volatoile, that the salary of a CEO is impossible to measure, bla bla bla. But holy guacamole, whatever is the angle I look at it 225MM pear year does not make any f_ing sense to me and it is si…
The claim is that you want the CEO to be aligned with the shareholders, and therefore you incentivize them with high salaries. Who cares about future shareholders or consequences for that matter when you earn 225MM ? Go move to some country that doesn't tax capital gains, sell it all, and live on 4% of it, which is 9MM per year; live like a king, buy absurd amounts of land and multiply your passive income. Obscene is…
That said, the rules for stock, stock ownership, and splits are all made up on the fly anyway so I don’t want to defend any of this. Stock dilution in particular seems like legal theft.