Live data from Hacker News

LK-99: Team of Southeast University observed zero resistance below 110 K

twitter.com

71–80 of 361 posts

Re: LK-99: Team of Southeast University observed zero resistance below 110 K

#71
post #35

Read the graph, there is a sharp drop in resistance from 220K-250K. Its still not superconducting but it could be hinting something?

That’s what I was thinking. In the video he brushes it off as a potential equipment malfunction, but perhaps it’s the effect everyone is looking for.

A sudden discontinuity like that but continuing the same curve and jumping back... that's equipment malfunction 99% of the time.

Re: LK-99: Team of Southeast University observed zero resistance below 110 K

#72

credibility of LK99 claims is very very high. What are the medium term practical implications for all these potential applications?

Start shorting power companies.

Hypothetically, if we did end up with a worldwide superconducting energy grid, this would smooth load, which I would expect would make generation cheaper (since we can get rid of the need for expensive peaker plants and/or stationary storage requirements to handle local demand spikes). This would therefore make power companies more profitable, no?

Re: LK-99: Team of Southeast University observed zero resistance below 110 K

#73
post #53

Ok not sure how to phrase this: Could there be small pieces of RTSC inside the sample (causing the floating) But then enough impurities to not be able to complete a circuit through the sample? And cooling makes other parts of the sample super conducting?

Could be insulated RTP superconducting crystals, grains, islands with the bulk being a high temperature superconductor?

Yes exactly.

Re: LK-99: Team of Southeast University observed zero resistance below 110 K

#74

Certainly no expert here but if you take the original video and replications at face value it does exhibit strong diamagnetism at room temperature. Superconductors are diamagnetic due to the Meissner effect at their superconducting temperature. This would mean LK99 is a superconductor at low temperature and separately be strongly diamagnetic at room temperature (no Meissner effect if it's not super conducting). Would…

I have seen it posted that diamagnetic materials require multiple magnets stuck together to create field "pockets" (?) for the material to rest in.

The few videos of lk99 show it reacting to a singular magnet. A property of superconductors that apparently diamagnetic materials don't have.

Re: LK-99: Team of Southeast University observed zero resistance below 110 K

#75
Novice question - does a material behaving as a superconductor occur all the sudden like a step function if resistance is plotted against temp and pressure - or does it ease into super conductor behavior?

(edit) Also is it resistance (aka if I remember my EE degree correctly), DC only or also impedance where frequency also matters?

Re: LK-99: Team of Southeast University observed zero resistance below 110 K

#76
post #71
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s what I was thinking. In the video he brushes it off as a potential equipment malfunction, but perhaps it’s the effect everyone is looking for.

A sudden discontinuity like that but continuing the same curve and jumping back... that's equipment malfunction 99% of the time.

Seems reasonable, then again we're dealing with a potential superconductor where sudden discontinuity is the expected result.

Re: LK-99: Team of Southeast University observed zero resistance below 110 K

#77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

increased geopolitical tension

That is an interesting observation and puts words to some thoughts that I've had: if it turns out that this is 'the real thing' and the patent holds up South Korea is suddenly a superpower.

Depends. This feels a bit like the Wright Brothers patenting wing warping. It's possible that innovation will happen so quickly that the original patents become worthless.

Frankly there is also zero chance that the patents are respected by all parties (i.e. China), regardless.

Re: LK-99: Team of Southeast University observed zero resistance below 110 K

#78
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is an interesting observation and puts words to some thoughts that I've had: if it turns out that this is 'the real thing' and the patent holds up South Korea is suddenly a superpower.

That doesn't follow at all. Lead and copper aren't exclusive to South Korea. The authors get prestige and the owners of whatever patents are granted get some money.

Of course they aren't. But patent owners get to set the terms under which their patents are licensed. It's not like the record business where there is a fixed deal and if you use someone's lyrics you know up front what it is going to cost you. Someone might not even want to do business with you at all...

Re: LK-99: Team of Southeast University observed zero resistance below 110 K

#79

Novice question - does a material behaving as a superconductor occur all the sudden like a step function if resistance is plotted against temp and pressure - or does it ease into super conductor behavior? (edit) Also is it resistance (aka if I remember my EE degree correctly), DC only or also impedance where frequency also matters?

all at once. It instantaneously expels the magnetic field. You can observe experiments on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RS7gyZJg5nc#t=32m30s

Re: LK-99: Team of Southeast University observed zero resistance below 110 K

#80
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is an interesting observation and puts words to some thoughts that I've had: if it turns out that this is 'the real thing' and the patent holds up South Korea is suddenly a superpower.

Depends. This feels a bit like the Wright Brothers patenting wing warping. It's possible that innovation will happen so quickly that the original patents become worthless. Frankly there is also zero chance that the patents are respected by all parties (i.e. China), regardless.

Yes, that is a definite possibility.
Post reply on HN