LK-99: Team of Southeast University observed zero resistance below 110 K
1–10 of 361 posts
Re: LK-99: Team of Southeast University observed zero resistance below 110 K
#2In the video, it says above 110K and not below, I got confused as well. I will add that a lot of people are deleting retweeting this. May be there is something more to it.
Re: LK-99: Team of Southeast University observed zero resistance below 110 K
#3As I understand it, this is strong evidence of this being a novel new superconductor, but not at room temperature.
That's still TBD but hasn't been replicated by anyone reputable yet.
Re: LK-99: Team of Southeast University observed zero resistance below 110 K
#4In American dollars that is -261.67F, a little chilly for room temp.
Re: LK-99: Team of Southeast University observed zero resistance below 110 K
#5Re: LK-99: Team of Southeast University observed zero resistance below 110 K
#6In the video, it says above 110K and not below, I got confused as well. I will add that a lot of people are deleting retweeting this. May be there is something more to it.
The first comment tells (from the professor talking in that video):
> In order not to misunderstand everyone, let me say that it is below 110K, and 0 resistance is observed at normal pressure.
Google translation, but I think it's clear that it's below and not above. At least normal pressure ... that's disappointing but still an improvement
Re: LK-99: Team of Southeast University observed zero resistance below 110 K
#7credibility of LK99 claims is very very high. What are the medium term practical implications for all these potential applications?
Re: LK-99: Team of Southeast University observed zero resistance below 110 K
#8In the video, it says above 110K and not below, I got confused as well. I will add that a lot of people are deleting retweeting this. May be there is something more to it.
In the Resistance-Temperature graph (https://twitter.com/Lipez400/status/1686793608626663441/phot...) the resistance starts increasing from 110K
Re: LK-99: Team of Southeast University observed zero resistance below 110 K
#9In the video, it says above 110K and not below, I got confused as well. I will add that a lot of people are deleting retweeting this. May be there is something more to it.
The first comment tells (from the professor talking in that video): > In order not to misunderstand everyone, let me say that it is below 110K, and 0 resistance is observed at normal pressure. Google translation, but I think it's clear that it's below and not above. At least normal pressure ... that's disappointing but still an improvement
I still don't understand what this is saying.
There was 0 resistance below 110 Kelvin (-165celcius)?
But not at room temperature?
Re: LK-99: Team of Southeast University observed zero resistance below 110 K
#10Why would other teams be observing floating at room temp? Is it possible to have a diamagnet that becomes a superconductor?