Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites

bbc.co.uk

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

581–590 of 673 posts

Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites

#581

Post by likeabbas »

wombatpm wrote: post #562
likeabbas wrote: post #263

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Certainly to me, especially given he’s testified under oath to multiple congressional committees and the ICIG. He’s made some outrageous accusations that absolutely need to be investigated. Either he’s lying and we have crazy people in very high levels of government, or he’s not and we need to get this information into the public domain.

The existence of National Security Advisor General Mike Flynn would seem to support the thesis that we have crazy people who lie at the highest levels of government.

Don’t you think congress should investigate these crazy people then?

Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites

#582

Post by mustacheemperor »

Flatcircle wrote: post #511

Please. If aliens were on earth there’d be lots of quality video and photos from people’s cellphones. Too many people with too many cellphones to not have any proof.

The F-117 nighthawk flew for years, all over the world, before there were any photos or videos.

The RQ-180 has been flying for years, all over the world, and has only been photographed twice, poorly, from far away.[0]

Not to say an unidentified flying object must be an alien, but it seems very obviously the case that there are aircraft flying around the globe today you and I haven't seen in photos and videos.

[0]https://theaviationist.com/2021/09/05/mystery-aircraft-phili...

Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites

#583

Post by flarg »

likeabbas wrote: post #263
mmcwilliams wrote: post #261

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does someone being a credentialed US intelligence official make their public statements more or less trustworthy than the average person?

Certainly to me, especially given he’s testified under oath to multiple congressional committees and the ICIG. He’s made some outrageous accusations that absolutely need to be investigated. Either he’s lying and we have crazy people in very high levels of government, or he’s not and we need to get this information into the public domain.

We had a crazy President

Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites

#584

Post by likeabbas »

mmcwilliams wrote: post #565
likeabbas wrote: post #540

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Probably somewhere along the specifying people and corporations that are conducting illegal activities - such as withholding information from congress and even killing people to protect this information. Even if congress doesn’t refer him to the justice department for perjury, the billion dollar defense contractors he’s making these allegations about should have no trouble suing him for defamation and false accusatio…

They will go after him assuming he is not a part of an apparently nearly century-long, multi-state, multi-billion dollar conspiracy that they have been perpetrating in near secret. What I'm suggesting is that if you maintain a conspiracy that vast and for that long, why would an individual lying to congress be a bridge too far? Is public testimony about second-hand knowledge all that's been stopping this from coming…

Well, he’s alleged that whoever is apart of the conspiracy has killed to protect this secret. Perhaps people have been too afraid to whistleblower because their lives were at stake

Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites

#586

Post by manjuc »

wildermuthn wrote: post #377

I’m a huge skeptic, but I’ve been following this very closely over the past few months. Fermi’s paradox has two good answers — we don’t see aliens because they don’t exist, or we don’t see them because they are here already. They should be here already. The paradox is about why we don’t see them. Being skeptical is different than doubt-by-default. A skeptic is curious and slow to judge. So with great curiosity, I’ve…

If these witnesses who have served and defended our country are lying under oath, Pentagon has all the means to prosecute them for misleading the congress, the senate and the public.

Watch this 5 min clip for additional context: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2FrloSlst1A

Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites

#587

Post by neom »

jiggawatts wrote: post #463
neom wrote: post #327

Full hearing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EL_HYG3uXQg I watched it, pretty weird. Particularly interesting: 1:45:00 through 2:00:00

Seems to be a lot of non-answers to me? Am I missing something?

Not sure if you're missing something. Are you referring to the whole thing, the area I thought was interesting, or..? This isn't a very easy reply to parse.

Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites

#588

Post by constantcrying »

soligern wrote: post #564
constantcrying wrote: post #512

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Time travel backwards is causality breaking, which is a far, far more important physical principle than relativity. Time travel forwards is quite simple though, but less exciting.

Time travel to the future is extremely exciting. Being able to pass a 1000 years in a year or two means you could observe the long term evolution of mankind over millennia. I’d much rather see that than the past if only one of the two were an option.

Time travel forward is comparitively simple, relativity basically tells you what to do. The implementation is hard but no need to break causality.

Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites

#589

Post by icedchai »

likeabbas wrote: post #580
icedchai wrote: post #568

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Call me skeptical, but if this stuff exists, it's been moved to another location already. A congressman isn't going to show up to some base and be given access to the hanger with the UFO in it.

There’s a report that one of these craft are so large that it can’t be moved https://youtu.be/r-zjLas_WbM

How'd they move it there in the first place?
Post reply on HN