Live data from Hacker News

Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites

bbc.co.uk

211–220 of 673 posts

Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites

#211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My thoughts exactly, what are they attempting to distract us from. I think it’s all the Hunter Biden stuff: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/hunter-b...

Why would a bunch of republicans want to distract from something they’ve been desperately trying to use as an attack on Biden for years? This is a bipartisan hearing.

Because it would shine a light on their own corruption. This isn't a problem with one party, the entire establishment is rotten

Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites

#214

It’s a good call out - the ability of the government to keep secrets across decades. But - tinfoil hat time - have they not demonstrated their ability to do this wrt the knowledge around nuclear weapons? Edit: and considering the claimed abilities of UAP, might those technologies be on par (in terms of military might) with the technology behind nuclear weapons? Also, that bit about a spaceship needing a biological pi…

You mean our nuclear weapons where the secrets were leaked[0] to other governments repeatedly? Those secrets? The secrets that we executed both of the Rosenbergs over?

No our government has not demonstrated their ability to keep secrets over the span of a few years, let alone decades.

[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_spies

Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites

#215

Technically, “non-human” bodies and technology that can “turn us into a charcoal briquette” precisely describes Laika of Sputnik II fame. We also did have flying saucers in the 50s, but they kind of sucked compared to helicopters. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laika https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avro_Canada_VZ-9_Avrocar

So a possibly feasible explanation is that there has been a bunch of animal testing by foreign defence initiatives that has crashed on US soil?

Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites

#216
One thing I find amazing is the diversity of UAP vehicles.

It used to be saucers, then silvery orbs, tic tac pills, triangles with bright lights , and now during the hearing we learn about dark cubes in translucent spheres!

I mean... how many different alien races exactly are playing tourists over here?

Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites

#217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> So, what stops the US government from making this an elaborate Psyops activity. Why should it be aliens _only_? That just depends on what evidence you do, or do not believe. Depending on your selection, and number of explanations may make sense. > In an unstable world, where power projection is necessary & inevitable, it is a tactical move to neither confirm or deny existence of unparalleled technological edge Pers…

> It is. UFO reports come out of all of those countries. India has a religious tradition with very clear UFO references, and videos come out of China all the time (although they tend to be purposely faked 100% of the times I've seen). I have lived/ been a citizen/ married to someone from each of these listed places. UFO reference in Hinduism is zero. I am practicing Hindu - I can vouch with 100% certainty. My wife is…

I literally pointed you to a kaggle file of reports from a major UFO reporting organization. And with regard to Hindu UFOs, I was referring to Vimana.

Not sure what you expect me to present as far as evidence goes when my point is "there is a ton of dubious evidence, but evidence none-the-less".

Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites

#218
post #132

Many people from the government and from the military are putting their reputation and career (and maybe safety) on the line to bring these informations to the public. Let’s at least recognize that before automatically casting doubt.

You're acting as if normal people in the military aren't normal, flawed human beings. Christ we literally had a member of the military inexplicably run into North Korea after a few bits of discipline for misbehavior.

Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites

#219

I don't know what to make of this. It just seems so incredibly implausibly that extraterrestrials would have the technology or motive to come to Earth without widespread detection.

Why would aliens have to destroy? When I go out for a hike in the woods or a hike in a new state/country that isn’t my home. I don’t go out destroying the land around me. I observe and enjoy my time Maybe these aliens are scientists. Documenting biological life across the galaxy. Maybe they’re VanCampers. Just bouncing from planet to planet for fun If a civilization has presumably reached FTL travel. I imagine many o…

To me the most interesting aspect is that all of the alien discussions and reports spiked after we invented nuclear weapons.

At the same time that’s also when we got mass media, developed our own funky airplanes and got portable cameras etc.

Re: Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites

#220
post #155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This stuff was popular in the Reagan era too. Odd to see it reappear right after Ronnie Junior left office They need performative theatre of such dramatic potential they can distract from the Senates bill about banning Congress owning stocks Edit: I don’t mean just the stock bill. They need to keep Overton window where it is.

Im not ruling out these UFO hearings are a conspiracy. Some sort of intelligence misdirection. But I recognize this is pure speculation. But cover for not banning congress from stock trading? Really? What is your basis?

The tactic isn't about any one thing but rather just keeping a distractable and gullible voting bloc from paying attention to any one thing and forming a coherent ideology or reconsidering their faith in a politician for obvious nefarious things. The republicans are MUCH more effective at doing this than democrats, but they have no qualms about massaging how news gets disseminated in order to hush up bad things and emphasize stupid things.
Post reply on HN