Earlier quoted context omitted.
No because people with enough influence will terminate your hosting, domain name, isp, bank account, or just get your site blocked. See kiwi farms, nigel farage, and the wikipedia-iwf dust-up. Mastodon and the fediverse are close, maybe, but many instances refuse to "speak" to one another because of their users.
[flagged]
UK version of “Online Harms Bill” wants to prefilter content without due process
41–50 of 111 posts
Re: UK version of “Online Harms Bill” wants to prefilter content without due process
#42Re: UK version of “Online Harms Bill” wants to prefilter content without due process
#43It's clear we cannot trust the institutional powers to self-regulate and do the right thing.
Re: UK version of “Online Harms Bill” wants to prefilter content without due process
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh, pity the (faux?) naive child who has been brought up on a diet of McCarthyism. You’re so scared of reds under the bed that you can’t see what the (increasingly far-)right wing are doing to you.
Based on what? Where is extreme right wing you are talking about?
Re: UK version of “Online Harms Bill” wants to prefilter content without due process
#45One question to UK fellas: is it me or the UK is becoming some sort of a surveillance state right in front of us just like china?
Re: UK version of “Online Harms Bill” wants to prefilter content without due process
#46One question to UK fellas: is it me or the UK is becoming some sort of a surveillance state right in front of us just like china?
When the UK does things which remind of you that, it isn't a coincidence. To be clear I'm not saying "this is literally 1984" or anything like that, I'm just trying to explain how "surveillance state" and "UK" have a LOT of known history.
Re: UK version of “Online Harms Bill” wants to prefilter content without due process
#47Re: UK version of “Online Harms Bill” wants to prefilter content without due process
#48Do they not realize that they will kill democracy in the process?
Re: UK version of “Online Harms Bill” wants to prefilter content without due process
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh, pity the (faux?) naive child who has been brought up on a diet of McCarthyism. You’re so scared of reds under the bed that you can’t see what the (increasingly far-)right wing are doing to you.
A right wing, especially a "far" right wing, government would have mass deportations, stop immigration, promote nationalist ideology, and not allow let alone themselves push things such as pride and other left wing social values. There doesn't exist any single example of this in the Anglo-sphere, nor the UK itself.
And maybe the Madagascar Plan?
Re: UK version of “Online Harms Bill” wants to prefilter content without due process
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
we are currently under a right wing government whose media friends smeared their only real opposition as... a dangerous communist who would destroy the country. their main opposition now are copying more and more of their policies. they are not, in fact, communists and are pretty far away from ever being left of centre.
A Right wing government would stop mass immigration and not promote leftist social values as current UK government/establishment does. Far away from right wing, certainly not nationalist in any way.
also one of their most controversial bills would lead to "illegal" immigrants being sent to Rwanda
skewed American perspectives aside, I genuinely fail to see how anyone would interpret them as anything left of centre-right