Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are completely correct I regret that word choice now. I was rushing to comment because I felt it was important to provide context on AMOC collapse scholarship.
Memento mori: top comment made the same mistake[1], your contributions reinforced the top comment, and your separate individual reply is the second comment. Rushing to comment has deep effects on HN, the threading incentivizes appending to the top comments rather than replying. This will now be a philosophical debate about scientific trust for hours just because people assume the article says "collapse is happening s…
A forthcoming collapse of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation
161–170 of 324 posts
Re: A forthcoming collapse of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation
#162Re: A forthcoming collapse of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation
#163Re: A forthcoming collapse of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation
#164Earlier quoted context omitted.
As a lay-bystander to the climate debate, I get a little spooked when I see comments like this. Like 99.9% of people, the science of complex climate systems is beyond me as are the de facto black box models that project climate change. Instead I use “appears in a credible journal” as a basis for trusting the apparent direction of travel and I’m disconcerted when I see that proxy challenged. I also, I am somewhat sorr…
Like you would any other thing that is outside your circle of influence: kick it out of your circle of concern because you aren't realistically speaking geared up to move yourself into a position where you do have influence. If you don't you end up with the global equivalent of a burn-out and it might start to affect your ability to make decisions about things that you do have influence over because it is paralyzing…
Re: A forthcoming collapse of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation
#165This has been on my mind this past week(and is only lightly tangential)...but would we be able to observe adaptations being made by plants/animals/ecosystems on a timescale of years or decades...to the changing climate? Humans will be playing mental gymnastics and politics for quite a while before any true changes to move the needle are made...but all other biological things can just make the adaptations...given enou…
According to this one[1], they're adapting by leaving later, and flying faster/taking less breaks to make up for the lost time. The result being that less of them make it to the breeding grounds (6% decrease in survival rate).
[1] https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2023/04/risky-strategy-help...
Re: A forthcoming collapse of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation
#166Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are challenges to overcome but thinking of the future as dystopia can be counterproductive.
Kind of an irrelevant point to make. We're setting new emissions records, so nothing so far has been productive.
We might have to contemplate things like geoengineering or whatever but thinking the future is bad is not enough. There has to be a positive vision, too.
Re: A forthcoming collapse of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation
#167I've got a background in this field and I am very surprised to see this published in Nature. The model presented is purely statistical with no representation of the underlying physics. When we are dealing with a phenomenon that is driven by well-understood physical laws (e.g. geophysical fluid dynamics, radiation physics etc) then these physical models are the most reliable basis for prediction. When I say physical m…
The journal is Nature Communications, which has a much lower impact factor than Nature. Many of the papers rejected from Nature are encouraged to be automatically transferred to Nature Communications. One nice thing about Nature Communications is that one can read the reviews: https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs414...
Re: A forthcoming collapse of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation
#168Earlier quoted context omitted.
Memento mori: top comment made the same mistake[1], your contributions reinforced the top comment, and your separate individual reply is the second comment. Rushing to comment has deep effects on HN, the threading incentivizes appending to the top comments rather than replying. This will now be a philosophical debate about scientific trust for hours just because people assume the article says "collapse is happening s…
This is the single biggest flaw in how HN discussions are formed. I almost always downvote the top comment. Often they completely derail any sort of meaningful discussion. I have fantasized around a "forum garden" where we could experiment with other ways of facilitating discussions.
Re: A forthcoming collapse of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation
#169I’m a physical oceanographer. While I have only skimmed this article I would like to make two quick comments. 1) The AMOC is one of the most studied parts of the world ocean and predictions about its collapse have been made since Stommel in 1961. I think in general any study on its imminent collapse should be taken with a grain of salt and it would be wise to wait for further replication and the consensus of the comm…
Re: A forthcoming collapse of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation
#170Earlier quoted context omitted.
Kind of an irrelevant point to make. We're setting new emissions records, so nothing so far has been productive.
Who is "we"? The US has reduced emissions records while increasing energy output for a number of years now. Europe has increased both, regardless of their rhetoric. China of course has increased both as well with more coal plants being built. Most of the reduction in the US is thanks to fracking/nat.gas displacing coal. Which a lot of people are against. Focusing on nuclear could get us a lot farther in displacing fo…
Meanwhile, back in the real world: https://ip-quarterly.com/sites/default/files/styles/dgap_tea...