Earlier quoted context omitted.
Prop 13 drives real estate prices up and rents while they lag also follow. And that drives the price of labor up as well. Even more malign it discourages muni's from approving housing because the property taxes don't cover the services that muni's have to pay for.
> And that drives the price of labor up as well. This is the real reason manufacturing is leaving the West, not regulation and not evil plan by China. This is also the real reason for culture of thowing away things and not repairing -> a new dishwasher costs £300, but a mechanic needs to charge £100 an hour to pay rent. If you rent is 50% of your income, the rent is actuslly 75% of your income -> because when you pay…
All foster kids in California can now attend any state college for free
541–550 of 585 posts
Re: All foster kids in California can now attend any state college for free
#542Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's not how the language works. We have long ago decided that "free", when used in the context of social services, is correct enough to be understood. Do you think that definition is bad? If so, maybe you'll catch more nibbles by trying to engage in a dialog?
That is incorrect. Social services are “free”, adhering to the legal and traditional definitions in that the entity offering the service is indeed not charging for the service. That is well understood. It is also understood that the source of funding for institutions which offer free services is taxes, fees, and levies from the general population. Regardless of what MMT proponents imagine, costs will eventually be re…
I disagree with your opinion in the third paragraph, but I think we can agree to disagree.
Re: All foster kids in California can now attend any state college for free
#543Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well good news, The local elections in San Fran I believe are already your dream.. How is that working out? I really like our electoral college system, believe we need stronger ID requirements to vote, and believe we need to repeal the 17th amendment returning more power to the states, removing it from the federal government. I will agree with one of your reforms, that of a voting holiday, though i would prefer inste…
Would you like the electoral college if something silly happened like Texas splitting into a Dallas dominated half and a non Dallas dominated half?
My Support for it is because we are a Union of States, i.e the United States. Our founders rightly believed government is most responsive at the local level, as such they only engineer one 1/2 of 1 branch of the federal government to be popularly elected. I believe this is the correct measure.
Direct Democracy tends to devolve into dictatorship, and we have seen this in American History as we become more and more "democratic" in our processes, more and power power has shifted to the federal government, and as more and more power has shifted to the federal government that power is further concentrated not in congress but in the Executive Branch, and the Administrative State.
So much so today that agencies of the federal government on a whim or executive order can simply establish new regulations that make millions of people criminals, or completely change entire economic markets with no input from Congress or the people, and in fact it takes an act of congress (or worse the Supreme Court) to stop them.
This is a complete and utter bastardization of a republican form of governance.
Eliminating the electoral college further drives us towards a more direct democracy, something I oppose
Re: All foster kids in California can now attend any state college for free
#544Earlier quoted context omitted.
Somehow European countries pull it off without bankrupting themselves.
Indeed, but not without tradeoffs, including: - accepting fewer students (having strict requirements). - failing students out in early classes (fewer opportunities to retake classes). - more professionally focused and shorter curriculum. - less class and subject choices - the degree commanding significantly less earnings For whatever reason, the best students seem to end up at a few top European schools (like Oxford)…
At the undergrad level, the subject matter is generally very well-established. But when you want a job after graduation, being close friends with the CEO's child helps far more than a few tenths of a point on your GPA.
Legacy admissions and nepotism are still very much a thing.
Re: All foster kids in California can now attend any state college for free
#545Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's easy to argue that nothing is truly "free" since tradeoffs always exist--at least to some small degree--but that isn't illuminating or helpful. We all know what is meant by "free" in this context, and there's no point in acting obtuse about it except to argue in bad faith.
I’m really not trying to argue in bad faith. Many conversations about “free” social services ignore real capital and human cost of the proposal as if it doesn’t exist. Why stop at education when basic needs like food, water, and shelter could all be “free”? The cost of residential water in CA, for example, is about an ⅛th of the education budget. In the case of covered education for foster kids, I’m conflicted. I’m i…
So if we're going to discuss the economic realities of government subsidies, we should go a bit further than "things cost money," because that's obvious and simplistic.
*Edit: Just want to add that the tax debate is indeed worth having. My point is only that the justification for subsidies is grounded in econ principles, not just the whims of the public.
Re: All foster kids in California can now attend any state college for free
#546Earlier quoted context omitted.
I grew up on welfare in a shit neighborhood, but now I'm an upper middle class engineer. Trust me, poor people need the help. We are all indirectly benefitting from people getting out of poverty.
Unsympathetic take. Lots of people can use help. Just because you're on welfare doesn't necessarily mean your financial position is any worse (especially as a dependant). I'm not from the US, but here in the UK when I when went to college and university the state would give students several thousand pounds a year for their parents being unemployed. My dad was a postman who used to do delivery driving on the weekend f…
Re: All foster kids in California can now attend any state college for free
#547Earlier quoted context omitted.
No I mean the average African-American is easily over 10x wealthier, and has far better opportunities than the average citizen of the countries that now inhabit the lands they originally came from. Because those countries were devastated by Europeans
Those countries were created by Europeans, they didn’t exist before that. The tribes that were there before were not much of a civilization. They weren’t behind the rest of the world because of colonialism, they were colonized because they were behind the rest of the world.
Would you say Native Americans were behind? They had a thriving society.
Re: All foster kids in California can now attend any state college for free
#548Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, disagree. College sports generate a significant amount of revenue for the university, which funds scholarships for a huge number of students that otherwise couldn't afford to go there. They have the added benefit of being fun and add entertainment to the college experience.
> Yeah, disagree. College sports generate a significant amount of revenue for the university, which funds scholarships for a huge number of students that otherwise couldn't afford to go there. This is objectively false for the small college I went to… in any case, you ignored my whole comment, even if it does make money, I don’t want it because this money corrupts beyond just the one university. It changes expectatio…
You got lucky. My alma mater needed to pay for similar, so they added new line items to every student's tuition.
Re: All foster kids in California can now attend any state college for free
#549This idea is not really new - the California Master Plan for Education essentially promised a free higher education to everyone in California. In 1960. [1] As these things go, the plan was eroded over time, with the (in)famous Proposition 13 of 1978 dealing a big blow. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Master_Plan_for_Hig...
I never thought something like that would be possible for me. It ended up being fairly easy. Moving to California radically changed my life for the better.
Re: All foster kids in California can now attend any state college for free
#550Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is this meme that Prop 13 is responsible for everything bad in California because of course we could pay for anything if we had more money. In reality the CA budget has grown faster than inflation for decades. https://www.statista.com/statistics/313176/california-state-...
That comparison makes no sense. At the very least you’d want to look at per capita figures. Prop 13’s impact on the political economy, empowering comfortable boomers, is probably as bad as its impacts on the budget.