Live data from Hacker News

Could an industrial civilization have predated humans on Earth?

nautil.us

111–120 of 282 posts

Re: Could an industrial civilization have predated humans on Earth?

#111

I can think of one plausible way that this happened: the simulation theory. Seeing as there are only a few logical options: * We stop being able to advance computing power * We somehow make it impossible or undesirable to create a realistic simulation * We destroy ourselves * We advance to the point where can and do create realistic simulations Then there is a very good chance that we are in fact, living in a simulat…

And then you remember that there are 10^23 particles in a single gram, which is in orders of magnitude of all CPUs on earth. We're as close in orders of magnitude to the size galaxy 10^20 as we are to the nucleus 10^-18. Or put it another way, there is the same amount of units of proton radius in 10 meters as there are 10 meters in the entire Galaxy. Another way to look at it, is that the most plausible assumption ab…

> If you assume the world is a simulation, it must be an imperfect simulation that shortcuts away several orders of magnitude compared to whatever it is meant to mimic.

I don't assume we are in a simulation, but I do agree with the bullet points I stated. Do you?

Re: Could an industrial civilization have predated humans on Earth?

#112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That was interesting until the last slide which had pictures of "objects" imaged on mars. At least one of those images has been debunked (random elevations creating coincidentally-interesting shadows). If that slide was a joke, they should have made it obvious for those looking at the slides without context of a presentation.

" The new images of the Face at Cydonia Mensa confirm eyes, nose, mouth, helmet structure with additional detail of nostrils and helmet ornaments being clearly seen in new images with details at approximately 1/10 scale of the face. New imagery confirms the pyramid structure seen in Viking images of the The D&M pyramid and new high resolution images show evidence of collapsed brickwork. New images of a face found at…

That's some industrial grade apophenia, pareidolia, and good old fashioned cognitive dissonance. The MSSS imagery makes it very plane that the Cydonian face is just a hill. But no, they put some white arrows pointing to nothing and claim it's evidence of a made up thing.

Re: Could an industrial civilization have predated humans on Earth?

#113

FTA: “The best [counter-argument] is probably the issue of deep mining,” Schmidt said. “We are mining very old deposits for metals and ore, and if these had been depleted by a prior civilization, it might have been noticed. These place limits on the scope of a prior civilization, but don’t eliminate the possibility.” This has interested me before, and I think it's good evidence to the contrary. I am not a geologist,…

But was the Canadian Shield exposed before the last glaciation? If it was buried under a large layer of other stuff before, the fact that it wasn't mined may not tell us much.

Re: Could an industrial civilization have predated humans on Earth?

#115
post #4

If there were an industrial civilization here before us (modern humans) then it would be astonishing that in all of the fossils we have discovered, we've never yet discovered a single ancient nut, bolt, screwdriver, wrench, etc. Not one single wire or cast metal part. As per the article, that civilization would have to predate all of the vast history of evolution that we know of. Wouldn't some higher life forms from…

Where are the tools that carved the high relief sculptures at Gobekli Tepe, around 12,000 years ago?

Where are the high relief carvings that predate Gobekli Tepe, which served as the skill development toward it?

For example.

And we don't need to go nearly that far back to notice lack of ancient metal that had to exist, given what it accomplished.

Metal disintegrates fast. Megalithic evidence, at minimum and across history, implies a woefully incomplete archaeological record.

Re: Could an industrial civilization have predated humans on Earth?

#116
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The rough shaping is not at issue. The challenge is maintaining tolerances along all axis and constraints on your detail work while using high forces and pressures to work the hard material. Grinding is a good guess for the possible material removal process — and it is up there today for the smallest tolerances using a mechanical process —- watch a video of a jig grinder in action. But what tool is used to hold or in…

I assume back then they weren't too fussed about having 100 people work on a small rock should they desire. I think we just don't comprehend, as mentioned above, how much time and effort could be allowed for back then. I'm sure 100 people could create a near perfect vase given 30 years to work on it (random example).

The feasibility is not a function of the time or number of people. When you remove material, the slightest error is irreversible. By combining error rate, design tolerance bounds and work point size in a statistical model, you should be able to prove that even using the entire known population on earth at the time for several centuries, you would not be able to product near anywhere the number of these specific artifacts found under the step pyramid (40,000). It’s sort of like the problem of enough monkey typing randomly to produce the work of Shakespeare.

Re: Could an industrial civilization have predated humans on Earth?

#117
post #93
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This assumes that their technology would be similar to ours. They could have used biological mechanical parts, made from plant or animal material. They could have had radically different theories of mechanics or construction that better fit the state of the planet at their time. In general the statement "They couldn't have been civilized because they aren't exactly like us" limits what we look for and how we look for…

That’s possible that they don’t have the same materials as us but they would have the same problems. Take plastic or metal. Their main draw is that they do not decompose or degrade. There are a billion problems that can be solved when you have a material that does not naturally degrade or decompose. So even if this civilization did not use plastic or metal, I find it hard to believe they didn’t come across a problem…

Absolutely metal and plastic decompose and break down, respectively.

Re: Could an industrial civilization have predated humans on Earth?

#118
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s possible that they don’t have the same materials as us but they would have the same problems. Take plastic or metal. Their main draw is that they do not decompose or degrade. There are a billion problems that can be solved when you have a material that does not naturally degrade or decompose. So even if this civilization did not use plastic or metal, I find it hard to believe they didn’t come across a problem…

Absolutely metal and plastic decompose and break down, respectively.

[deleted]

Re: Could an industrial civilization have predated humans on Earth?

#119
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s possible that they don’t have the same materials as us but they would have the same problems. Take plastic or metal. Their main draw is that they do not decompose or degrade. There are a billion problems that can be solved when you have a material that does not naturally degrade or decompose. So even if this civilization did not use plastic or metal, I find it hard to believe they didn’t come across a problem…

Absolutely metal and plastic decompose and break down, respectively.

The latter, back into oil.

Re: Could an industrial civilization have predated humans on Earth?

#120
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not pre-human but challenging the understood modern human timeline of industrialisation — We have not found the tools, but we may have found the products; in the form of stone-based vases that archeologists attribute to the Early Egyptian Period but are believed to be from much earlier, and would have required tools that have not been discovered yet. The channel UnchartedX make a compelling argument about this hypoth…

I recall TV shows saying that the Egyptian pyramids could not have been constructed with Egyptian technology, so it must have been space aliens. The same for the closely fitting stones in Inca buildings. It doesn't take advanced technology to do either of those things. My favorite one was pi is there in the relationship between the pyramid base length and its height, and the Egyptians had no notion of pi. Again, spac…

Both can be true that it took more advanced tech than they are credited and it wasn't aliens.
Post reply on HN