Live data from Hacker News

How to Pick a Mate (1946)

gutenberg.org

21–30 of 155 posts

Re: How to Pick a Mate (1946)

#21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because picking a good marriage partner is ableist. That's why it's controversial. For example, people prefer good looking people as marriage partners. That makes people who are not good looking sad. And you can imagine for other traits like income, age, height, social status.

What a time to be able to read.

They were clearly joking. I think.

Re: How to Pick a Mate (1946)

#22

Co-author Vance O. Packard's 1957 book "The Hidden Persuaders" was a best-seller. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vance_Packard

Thank you for the link. His output seems to be remarkably perenial and valid today, the kind that's usually done by a profound observer that has all the information but that can also see things through the eyes of an outsider.

Re: How to Pick a Mate (1946)

#23

> There are still other people who don’t marry because they lack a decent opportunity. Girls who choose nursing as a career, for example, cut their marriage prospects at least fifty per cent. It is much the same for librarians and social workers. In fact a girl can reduce her chances of marriage merely by going to a girls’ college. you have been warned /s

There’s nothing controversial about it. Usually people get to know other people at university or at work. To meet someone outside of your everyday environment requires extra effort. I know it from my own experience as well (trying to find a girlfriend while studying CS).

Re: How to Pick a Mate (1946)

#24
post #13
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don't think this is true?

Judging by how you feel it necessary to even ask such a ridiculous question, I strongly doubt you would accept any answer but that which supports your anachronistic views.

A man goes to the office every working day. He works long hours as he is trying to prove himself and really grow his career. Even after work, he's more likely to just quietly hit the gym or read in the evenings.

He's obviously hurt his chances at marriage. He's not investing in any women. He's not socializing or dating, he's not learning to be a good partner.

Now go back and pretend I said "woman" instead of "man".

Re: How to Pick a Mate (1946)

#25
> More than ten per cent of the eligible men today won’t marry, but that will largely be due to the fact that they prefer to remain bachelors.

I'm sure that's the full story on why they won't marry, 1940's era author ;)

Re: How to Pick a Mate (1946)

#27

There obvious historical issues with this book that make it hard to apply to today, but I was still surprised at how well written this was for it’s time. This also shows the importance of birth control in women’s lives. In 1946, sex was a roll of the dice to being pregnant. The odds are now massively improved to avoid pregnancy by using modern birth control methods.

Marriage would be so much more straightforward if many of the lessons that we had to learn anyway were presented up front. It’s too bad that so many pre-marriage “courses” are religious in nature.

Re: How to Pick a Mate (1946)

#28
post #13
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don't think this is true?

Judging by how you feel it necessary to even ask such a ridiculous question, I strongly doubt you would accept any answer but that which supports your anachronistic views.

Data about marriage among people who choose various lifepaths is not a viewpoint.

Re: How to Pick a Mate (1946)

#29

"Your chances of getting a mate you will like are even affected by your sex. If you are a girl your chances are not as good as if you were a man. This is largely due to the fact that a girl cannot gracefully take the initiative in stalking a mate who looks attractive to her." Ladies, stalking a man does work, sometimes.

The whole "he wouldn't stop calling me/stopping by my work etc till we went on a date and now we've been married 40+ years" was apparently a LOT more common back in the mid 20th century.

Hard to imagine that happening today.

Re: How to Pick a Mate (1946)

#30
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Interestingly that today we laugh at the fact that there is a book helping people how to make one of the most important decisions in their life. It is normal to have books about how to cook food, how to travel, how to exercise. But God forbid there should be a book on how to select a good marriage partner.

Because picking a good marriage partner is ableist. That's why it's controversial. For example, people prefer good looking people as marriage partners. That makes people who are not good looking sad. And you can imagine for other traits like income, age, height, social status.

I'm going to assume that you believe that there is only one standard for "good looking people" and that everyone conforms to it?
Post reply on HN