Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because picking a good marriage partner is ableist. That's why it's controversial. For example, people prefer good looking people as marriage partners. That makes people who are not good looking sad. And you can imagine for other traits like income, age, height, social status.
What a time to be able to read.
How to Pick a Mate (1946)
21–30 of 155 posts
Re: How to Pick a Mate (1946)
#22Co-author Vance O. Packard's 1957 book "The Hidden Persuaders" was a best-seller. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vance_Packard
Re: How to Pick a Mate (1946)
#23> There are still other people who don’t marry because they lack a decent opportunity. Girls who choose nursing as a career, for example, cut their marriage prospects at least fifty per cent. It is much the same for librarians and social workers. In fact a girl can reduce her chances of marriage merely by going to a girls’ college. you have been warned /s
Re: How to Pick a Mate (1946)
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
You don't think this is true?
Judging by how you feel it necessary to even ask such a ridiculous question, I strongly doubt you would accept any answer but that which supports your anachronistic views.
He's obviously hurt his chances at marriage. He's not investing in any women. He's not socializing or dating, he's not learning to be a good partner.
Now go back and pretend I said "woman" instead of "man".
Re: How to Pick a Mate (1946)
#25I'm sure that's the full story on why they won't marry, 1940's era author ;)
Re: How to Pick a Mate (1946)
#26Re: How to Pick a Mate (1946)
#27There obvious historical issues with this book that make it hard to apply to today, but I was still surprised at how well written this was for it’s time. This also shows the importance of birth control in women’s lives. In 1946, sex was a roll of the dice to being pregnant. The odds are now massively improved to avoid pregnancy by using modern birth control methods.
Re: How to Pick a Mate (1946)
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
You don't think this is true?
Judging by how you feel it necessary to even ask such a ridiculous question, I strongly doubt you would accept any answer but that which supports your anachronistic views.
Re: How to Pick a Mate (1946)
#29"Your chances of getting a mate you will like are even affected by your sex. If you are a girl your chances are not as good as if you were a man. This is largely due to the fact that a girl cannot gracefully take the initiative in stalking a mate who looks attractive to her." Ladies, stalking a man does work, sometimes.
Hard to imagine that happening today.
Re: How to Pick a Mate (1946)
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interestingly that today we laugh at the fact that there is a book helping people how to make one of the most important decisions in their life. It is normal to have books about how to cook food, how to travel, how to exercise. But God forbid there should be a book on how to select a good marriage partner.
Because picking a good marriage partner is ableist. That's why it's controversial. For example, people prefer good looking people as marriage partners. That makes people who are not good looking sad. And you can imagine for other traits like income, age, height, social status.