Live data from Hacker News

Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

threads.net

241–250 of 356 posts

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#241
post #192

With the crazy success of TikTok, do people care about text based content?

Personally the crazy success of TikTok makes me care more about text based content. Threads won't be it for me though.

Ditto. I use ig just for business and twitter to stay up to date with everything else. I won't mix these together.

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#242

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don't have to pay and the rate limits are temporary, this was stated at the point they started. It's a big deal to the anti-Musk activists but from a user standpoint it's generally negligible.

Pro-musks activists keep telling us it’s no big deal but how exactly is it better for users to kick them all out of tweetdeck and force them to pay for twitter blue? More and more accounts are getting off the twitter bandwagon. Clearly it has an impact on users to keep losing features, being asked to pay and now being limited in how many tweets they can read per day. How’s that an improvement for the normal user?

You've listed a few anti-user changes here - some of them incorrect (nobody is forced to pay for anything) - and then asked how the anti-user changes are pro-user. Certainly not the most logical of questions. There are of course many other changes. A better question would be, despite the claims you're making (those of which are valid), has the user experience gotten better or worse? Aside from the third-party apps and temporary rate-limits, you haven't mentioned anything else. So add those negatives to the changes that are pro-user positives and I think you have your answer.

By the way - what is a pro-Musk activist? Someone who corrects false statements on the internet?

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#243

I signed up. And the first thing I saw was a whole bunch of posts from people I don't follow. They had the opportunity to learn directly from Twitter's mistakes, and they failed right from the start.

How would you bootstrap the feed?

Perhaps parent-poster would be satisfied if the signup process contained a choice like:

* Yes, please create a starter feed for me of popular content.

* No, I want to start with a blank feed so that I can gradually add things on my own.

That way there's both an explanation of why all those strangers are listed, and a mechanism to curate more carefully.

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#244
post #92

I feel like there’s a chicken and egg problem for Threads: it uses your existing Instagram social graph to populate your Threads account. Of course FB is going to do that otherwise they lose a massive edge against any competitor. But for me at least my Twitter is a very different social space to my Instagram and there’s very little crossover. So Threads looks like it’ll be text posts with your Instagram friends. Whic…

The only thing I care about on Twitter is the emergency services that use it. I can no longer access their info now that Twitter requires a sign-in and it would be nice to have that access.

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#246
post #92

I feel like there’s a chicken and egg problem for Threads: it uses your existing Instagram social graph to populate your Threads account. Of course FB is going to do that otherwise they lose a massive edge against any competitor. But for me at least my Twitter is a very different social space to my Instagram and there’s very little crossover. So Threads looks like it’ll be text posts with your Instagram friends. Whic…

It also seems like a problem for anonymity. On Twitter, I can create multiple accounts and I can stay anonymous if I like. I don't know about IG, but FB only allows one account. I don't want my info leaking somehow.

I also have a very different Twitter space from my FB space. Though my IG is also different from my FB.

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#247
post #77
post #7

That feels oddly low. It was released at 5ish PM PST on a Wednesday, and considering they have literally all of Instagram + Facebook's userbase to push it on, it seems pretty low. The "sign up" was also just a "log in with FB/Instagram" button where the form was already auto-filled. So it's not like people had to convert, it's pretty much about as pure a product-market-fit test you can get. Discoverability is also pr…

2 million users in 2 hours is incomparable to any social network growth rate I've seen. Where as the entire Fediverse has 11 million registered users in 7 years. I don't know how that 2M in 2 hours is 'oddly low' but at that rate, Threads will surpass the entire Fediverse in less than 24 hours and will be centralizing the Fediverse when it turns on ActivityPub.

It needs time to tell - not a lot of time, but more than a few hours. Lots of people sign up to park an account on new services and Threads is going to be one of the most heavily-parked of them all.

It's DAU/MAU numbers and retention that make the bigger difference. ActivityPub has had pretty good retention since the early era of Mastodon - not gangbusters growth, but enough for people to feel comfortable with the ecosystem as it stands and uninfluenced by a large instance.

AP's "core experience" is more like a combo of Usenet, web forums and email than XMPP or Twitter - it can be aggregated and surveilled, but the social graph isn't solely in messaging and follower connections, it's in space-making and exclusivity. While individual users can be coerced into centralizing, spaces are a much harder nut and are why little PhpBB forums persist even now. You can have all the users but not the spaces, and if you don't play nice with the spaces, adios.

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#248
post #63
post #28

Is this working for people in Firefox? I can't get the site to work for me

Disable "Enhanced Tracking Protection" for the domain, since it needs to load scripts from fbcdn.net domains.

Same issue here. I refuse to disable this.

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#249

[flagged]

It's no worse than obsessively refreshing Hacker News on your PinePhone.

While i agree with you on principle... i hope it's worse than HN lol. If not, i need to get rid of HN because of all the horrible behavior Facebook and Co have fostered in their community for the sake of engagement.

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#250

It looks like you can't compose a new thread on desktop. For a text-centric app, the lack of computer keyboard access is disheartening. I understand that the Threads team may want to focus on their core market on mobile. However, mobile prioritization will lead to posting content best composed on mobile, namely curt text and memes. I hope giving these types of content an early start won't affect the the culture on Th…

Twitter was rather extensively used for long form multi-tweet posts. Composing this type of content in a mobile app does not sound fun.

(I don’t like Twitter as a medium for long posts like this, but the bottom line doesn’t care what I like.)

Post reply on HN