Live data from Hacker News

Germany Achieves Record 57.7% Renewable Energy Share for First Half of 2023

ise.fraunhofer.de

301–310 of 430 posts

Re: Germany Achieves Record 57.7% Renewable Energy Share for First Half of 2023

#301
post #254
post #216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> the AfD, which is a far-right party most would never consider to vote for. The AFD is currently the second most popular political party in Germany and the strongest in many parts. It's also better described as center-left.

No, the AfD is a right extremist party, one of their leading figures, Björn Höcke can now legally be called a Nazi.

And that's exactly proof of how immensely far left Germany's politics have shifted. In absolute terms, the AFD is a left leaning party. They still support "immigration" for example.

Re: Germany Achieves Record 57.7% Renewable Energy Share for First Half of 2023

#302
post #255
post #193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In other words, shutting down nuclear plants means a) replacing the energy generation with coal (mostly lignite), or b) importing energy from other countries, which generate it from coal (mostly lignite) like Poland. Importing will likely be "cheap", because we all agree to collectively pretend that externalities like CO2 emissions or catastrophic pollution from coal plants are not a thing. Can't see how any of these…

Oh no no. Germany loves importing nuclear electricity from France, Czech Republic and others too. Makes the government feel good about having quit nuclear, because somehow when it comes from across the border it's not so bad anymore.

NIMBY has a strong tradition in Germany.

Re: Germany Achieves Record 57.7% Renewable Energy Share for First Half of 2023

#303

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's wrong in building nuclear power plants? And before teaching lessons to Eastern European countries, remember that the West had 50 years after the WWII to build up the economy and infrastructure. It would be only fair to let Eastern European countries to develop for the same period, without demanding them pay the costs of higher energy prices.

What's wrong in terms of emissions is that they take forever to plan and build. During which time, Poland will continue to produce its electricity almost exclusively from coal. These are real emissions that can't be made up for once the nuclear plants are finished. The alternative is to replace a lot of the coal really fast with renewables. Further more, it's cheaper so you can replace a lot more than with nuclear.

There was a very good article on HN about how nuclear reactors only seem to have gotten harder to plan and execute in Western countries since the 1980s due to ever-increasing regulations. Building a nuclear reactor doesn't have to take decades.

Re: Germany Achieves Record 57.7% Renewable Energy Share for First Half of 2023

#304

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With individual transport, you move ~2 tons of metal for a payload of one person, a weight/person ratio of 2. With high-speed rail, you move ~400 tons of metal for ~450 people, a ratio of ~0.9. [0] This does not even account for factors such as inherently more efficient transmission from steel to steel vs rubber/concrete and the more efficient electric engines of a modern train compared to the combustion engine. Neit…

You forget that most people don't live or work next to the rail station. That makes rail inefficient in the only way that matters to most people - their time. (I say that as someone who takes trains to work most days.)

People don't live near rail stations because we have been subsidizing cars for fifty years while letting the rail network crumble.

Re: Germany Achieves Record 57.7% Renewable Energy Share for First Half of 2023

#305
post #217
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Heating is one thing we have tackle, but also transportation which uses up 27.1% of energy in German. Individual transportation should be a main target, we would all shift from cars to public transport or bicycles. About 40% of distances driven with cars are shorter than 5 kilometers, a distance that's perfect for a bicycle. On top of that, car owners tend to underestimate the cost of their cars[1] [0] https://www.um…

I would like to see you cycling 5 km in the Alps against the wind in the rain. Cycling is fine. I do it 7 km to the work. But only because it is flat. And only when the weather is fine.

I'm fine with people in the Alps taking their car when it's raining and windy. That still leaves 99% of the population who can take their E-bike for short trips.

Re: Germany Achieves Record 57.7% Renewable Energy Share for First Half of 2023

#306

Earlier quoted context omitted.

isn’t coal more expensive if you take all the negative externalities into account? Specifically increased rates of cancer and other diseases caused by pollution on top of CO2 emission?

Maybe, but that's irrelevant today, the original plans were crushed by reality, and now we must accept the mess and move on. Germany could have been in a better situation, if politicians did a better job a decade or two ago. But complaining today about the mess from yesterday, because of the fails from 12 years ago is pointless.

Germany hasn't learned a thing. https://www.rbb24.de/politik/beitrag/2023/07/berlin-verkehr-...

All that most Germans want to do, is to drive in their SUVs and park everywhere. That is what they vote for. Meanwhile they vote against nuclear (I'm scared) and wind (Verschanden meine Landschaft)

Re: Germany Achieves Record 57.7% Renewable Energy Share for First Half of 2023

#307
post #202
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Heating is one thing we have tackle, but also transportation which uses up 27.1% of energy in German. Individual transportation should be a main target, we would all shift from cars to public transport or bicycles. About 40% of distances driven with cars are shorter than 5 kilometers, a distance that's perfect for a bicycle. On top of that, car owners tend to underestimate the cost of their cars[1] [0] https://www.um…

This is why so many are fed up with Germany and especially Germany's current government. You know, maybe people don't want to bike in a country where it's too hot in the summer, too icey/cold/snowy in the winter and where it rains constantly in the other two seasons? This whole attitude of "I tell you how to live your life because reasons" is preposterous.

So? Take the bike when the weather is nice and the car when it's not nice. That still reduces the kilometers you drive by a lot. Nobody forces you to bike when it's 40°C or -20.

Re: Germany Achieves Record 57.7% Renewable Energy Share for First Half of 2023

#308

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> seeing loads of wind turbines everywhere The wind turbines are only there to hide the giant, coal-powered power plants that Germany had to restart because the tree-huggers who run that country decided to ditch nuclear. I very much doubt the veracity of this article.

Ah yes, notorious tree-hugger Merkel in 2011.

Merkel had no strongly held positions, that much we all know.

Re: Germany Achieves Record 57.7% Renewable Energy Share for First Half of 2023

#309
post #141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It's hard for renewables to replace coal or nuclear though, because coal and nuclear provide baseload power, whereas wind and solar are very intermittent and require basically 100% gas backup (as there will be circumstances with very low wind and solar, which tends to happen in europe on very cold, still, winter nights when demand is the highest). I absolutely agree with you that we need the coal plants and imports…

How is energy storage a solved problem? All the battery storage in the world today would power half of Germany's minimum electrical load for minutes.

Germany has enough storage capacity for natural gas to last a couple of months. The same can be build for Hydrogen. Some of the existing infrastructure can even be reused.

Re: Germany Achieves Record 57.7% Renewable Energy Share for First Half of 2023

#310
post #6

... and yet Germany looks awful on https://app.electricitymaps.com/map . Is that a measurement problem, or something else that we should know?

On this map Germany always looks bad until you zoom out enough to see the USA.

At least the US has cheap energy. Germany has high taxes, high energy prices and still manages to be dirty while being morally arrogant.
Post reply on HN