Earlier quoted context omitted.
>>Plenty of nation that are not lawless but are effectively unregulated in the matters being discussed. I think you have basic misunderstandings of economic concepts and the state of the world economy. Can you provide an example of poorly performing economies which "are not lawless but are effectively unregulated in the matters being discussed"?
[flagged]
You wrote:
>>>>How are the citizens in the least regulated doing on that front?
Now you're noting that some countries don't have specific workplace condition mandates. Not having said law doesn't mean they meet the ideals noted, of having laws establishing a free market, while lacking regulations that restrict voluntary exchange. To elaborate: in order to prove classical economists' and libertarians' claims about the free market being optimal are wrong, you'd have to show far more than these cherry-picked examples.
Your argument is sloppy, and when I request for more vigor, you lash out to create a flame war. This is not intellectual or scientific.
I'm absolutely justified in demanding you support your claims with evidence, and your belligerent responses are not justified, no matter how morally superior you believe yourself to be.