Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are conflating lack of regulations with lawlessness. If literal anarchy was the alternative, then you'd have a point. Anyways, the device in question would simply not have existed if there wasn't for competition. His comment is thus evidence of its content being false.
No. You're being either being willfully disingenuous or completely lacking knowledge of the variety in this world. Plenty of nation that are not lawless but are effectively unregulated in the matters being discussed. And they do not fit your supposition. Really...
I think you have basic misunderstandings of economic concepts and the state of the world economy. Can you provide an example of poorly performing economies which "are not lawless but are effectively unregulated in the matters being discussed"?