That's my grain of salt anyway...
Node.js to pass Ruby on Rails in search popularity
11–20 of 36 posts
Re: Node.js to pass Ruby on Rails in search popularity
#12make the graph smaller, and the RoR decline will be much slower, and the actual overcoming does not seem too close http://www.google.com/trends/?q=ruby+on+rails,+node.js&c... (or remove "on" from the first and the search volume increases by 30%) Really, couldn't this be less trollish? node js searches double in one year: http://www.google.com/trends/?q=node.js&ctab=0&geo=all&date=ytd&sort=1
A more thorough analysis would also require factoring in "node.js", "node", "nodejs", versus "ror", "rails", etc, all with the right intent and right context. That's really tough.
> couldn't this be less trollish?
This isn't scientific, but it's a milestone nonetheless - aren't all milestones arbitrary?
Re: Node.js to pass Ruby on Rails in search popularity
#13Interesting that it has less velocity than Rails did at inception. Less of a revolution?
(note: "hype machine" is either a compliment or an insult based on your point of view, however they were very successful marketing Ruby on Rails and themselves. Regardless of my view point, I have to respect that.)
Re: Node.js to pass Ruby on Rails in search popularity
#14Re: Node.js to pass Ruby on Rails in search popularity
#15Try this : http://www.google.com/trends/?q=ruby+on+rails,+node.js,+php&... ;)
;-)
Re: Node.js to pass Ruby on Rails in search popularity
#16make the graph smaller, and the RoR decline will be much slower, and the actual overcoming does not seem too close http://www.google.com/trends/?q=ruby+on+rails,+node.js&c... (or remove "on" from the first and the search volume increases by 30%) Really, couldn't this be less trollish? node js searches double in one year: http://www.google.com/trends/?q=node.js&ctab=0&geo=all&date=ytd&sort=1
> or remove "on" from the first and the search volume increases by 30% A more thorough analysis would also require factoring in "node.js", "node", "nodejs", versus "ror", "rails", etc, all with the right intent and right context. That's really tough. > couldn't this be less trollish? This isn't scientific, but it's a milestone nonetheless - aren't all milestones arbitrary?
Also, I'm sure that the grandparent comment poster is relaxed, it's rather condescending and irrelevant to tell him otherwise. EDIT: parent comment was edited after I posted this.
Re: Node.js to pass Ruby on Rails in search popularity
#17Of course Node.js search queries are rising. There is a lot of noise being made about the platform, the platform is relatively recent, and people are curious about it.
Of course Ruby on Rails search queries are falling. It has been out for a while, and people have become familiar with it at this point.
In other words, they don't need to google for Ruby on Rails when they can just go to one of the sites that they have bookmarked.
This is not a milestone by any stretch of the imagination.
Re: Node.js to pass Ruby on Rails in search popularity
#18Take a look at this comparison for the terms "ruby", "python", and "javascript": http://www.google.com/trends/?q=python,+ruby,+javascript
From the graph, it appears that JavaScript's popularity is fading; I'd say that it has never been higher than in these recent years.
Re: Node.js to pass Ruby on Rails in search popularity
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
> or remove "on" from the first and the search volume increases by 30% A more thorough analysis would also require factoring in "node.js", "node", "nodejs", versus "ror", "rails", etc, all with the right intent and right context. That's really tough. > couldn't this be less trollish? This isn't scientific, but it's a milestone nonetheless - aren't all milestones arbitrary?
I'm confused, you say that it would be difficult to accurately picture search traffic, then you say that this is a clear milestone. Also, I'm sure that the grandparent comment poster is relaxed, it's rather condescending and irrelevant to tell him otherwise. EDIT: parent comment was edited after I posted this.
Re: Node.js to pass Ruby on Rails in search popularity
#20make the graph smaller, and the RoR decline will be much slower, and the actual overcoming does not seem too close http://www.google.com/trends/?q=ruby+on+rails,+node.js&c... (or remove "on" from the first and the search volume increases by 30%) Really, couldn't this be less trollish? node js searches double in one year: http://www.google.com/trends/?q=node.js&ctab=0&geo=all&date=ytd&sort=1
I don't see the point you're trying to make.