> if you’re a firm believer in free speech, you should now be experiencing a deafening cacophony of alarm bells This article is sensationalist. If a directional mic/speaker is a "speech jamming gun" then a loud speaker is a "free speech area jammer". And you really don't need the mic - just blast Justin Bieber at a conversation and nobody will be able to hear anything intelligible anyway... If you had a "totalitarian…
New speech-jamming gun hints at dystopian Big Brother future
21–30 of 32 posts
Re: New speech-jamming gun hints at dystopian Big Brother future
#22In short, imagine if a runaway mega-corporation or government gains control of these earbuds. Not only could the intelligence-destroying blasts from Harrison Bergeron come to pass, but with Delayed Auditory Feedback it would be possible to render the entire population mute. Is it just me who thought; well if a runaway mega-corporation does come to exist, in a position to force society to wear such earbuds (or whateve…
Re: New speech-jamming gun hints at dystopian Big Brother future
#23Re: New speech-jamming gun hints at dystopian Big Brother future
#24It's not a speech-jamming gun at all. It's a speaker which plays back your speech to you. It could be easily circumvented with $.10 earplugs...
Even the best earplugs only muffle sound to a certain degree. Sound, especially loud sounds, is transmitted very well through the bones in your head.
Re: New speech-jamming gun hints at dystopian Big Brother future
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
It doesn't cancel your speech - it plays it back to you with a slight delay. You hear what you said an instant ago. Turn on the TV. Try repeating what someone talking continuously says right after they say it. That's what happens; it jams you mentally. Granted simultaneous translators at the UN do it with a twist, so it's possible.
No, I mean, if you wore earplugs to defend yourself from the jammer -- you can't tell how loud you're talking, and controlling pitch/tone can be hard, too. (AFAIK, this is why deaf people find it hard to speak.)
People who have been deaf from birth or youth find it hard to speak because they don't have the experience hearing others pronounce words which lets them develop proper pronunciation (similar to how non-native speakers have an accent).
People born with normal hearing who have lost their hearing due to age or noise exposure have no problem speaking.
Re: New speech-jamming gun hints at dystopian Big Brother future
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
It doesn't cancel your speech - it plays it back to you with a slight delay. You hear what you said an instant ago. Turn on the TV. Try repeating what someone talking continuously says right after they say it. That's what happens; it jams you mentally. Granted simultaneous translators at the UN do it with a twist, so it's possible.
No, I mean, if you wore earplugs to defend yourself from the jammer -- you can't tell how loud you're talking, and controlling pitch/tone can be hard, too. (AFAIK, this is why deaf people find it hard to speak.)
In general, I am not sure that the claim that this is going to prevent people from talking very effectively. Maybe it will be uncomfortable, but with a little bit of training and earplugs would not be effective for too long.
Re: New speech-jamming gun hints at dystopian Big Brother future
#27Re: New speech-jamming gun hints at dystopian Big Brother future
#28Speech jammers are introduced into Japanese schools. From the article: “We have to establish and obey rules for proper turn-taking when speaking." Sounds like a school to me. This type of technology used on kids could have long-term impact on their ability to think during public conversations. And once the teacher realizes they can silence any student at will, do you think they'll stop at the "louder, stronger" voices? Any student with an opinion the teacher doesn't like could get zapped. And the worst part is not that other students won't hear their ideas -- it's that the student herself will have those thoughts disrupted.
Entrepreneurs are who we are because we think outside the box -- we do things we're told can't be done. Most people aren't like that. And imagine if every time you talked about anything "out of the norm" as a child your very thoughts were stopped. Chilling.
I guess if Japanese authorities want that kind of conformity, it might help the US economy...but I'm still not a fan.
Re: New speech-jamming gun hints at dystopian Big Brother future
#29For this to work, the audio output to each individual person has to be exactly what each individual person is currently saying. If it's a combined audio mess of an entire audience's voices, it's not exactly going to screw up anyone's speech patterns.
So the only way this could work in an audience would be if the back of every chair in front of people had one of these devices on it which could filter out the noise of everyone else around that person and only output their voice.
Re: New speech-jamming gun hints at dystopian Big Brother future
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
Even the best earplugs only muffle sound to a certain degree. Sound, especially loud sounds, is transmitted very well through the bones in your head.
Bone conduction only works well for lower frequencies, unless a transducer or vibrating object is directly coupled to your body. Earplugs would work just fine in this application.