Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’m working on a startup that’s training LLMs to be authentic so they can simulate human affection and it’s actually working really well! The key is humanity’s ability to pattern match: we’re actually pretty terrible at it. Our brains are so keen on finding patterns that they often spot them where none exist. Remember the face on Mars? It was just a pile of rocks. The same principle applies here. As long as the AI so…
You wrote: "I’m working on a startup that’s training LLMs to be authentic so they can simulate human affection and it’s actually working really well!" I got news for you buddy: I and a hell of a lot of people know the difference between eating the menu (AI) and the meal (loved ones and dear friends). My lady is from south America, multi lingual, and has a better degree from a better school than I. Seriously, how are…
Humans aren’t mentally ready for an AI-saturated ‘post-truth world’
191–200 of 548 posts
Re: Humans aren’t mentally ready for an AI-saturated ‘post-truth world’
#192Earlier quoted context omitted.
More than interfaces. To quote McLuhan: "Man becomes, as it were, the sex organs of the machine world, as the bee of the plant world, enabling it to fecundate and to evolve ever new forms. The machine world reciprocates man's love by expediting his wishes and desires, namely, in providing him with wealth." The AI thing has been jarring but it's nothing new. All part of the same process.
Thanks for sharing. I want to hear more from him. Do you have a recommended book by McLuhan to start with?
Re: Humans aren’t mentally ready for an AI-saturated ‘post-truth world’
#193Earlier quoted context omitted.
The chilling effect may actually be a good thing, given that discourse these days is overheated. There's a weird magic trick that social media companies have played on people to convince them that the text and images consumed on their websites are socially/culturally/politically relevant. Once it becomes clear how easy it is to fake that text people will come to understand how cheap and irrelevant "opinion" has becom…
The entire thesis of TFA is that human psychological traits on societal scales are not prepared to handle an arena of discourse where that's true, that people will either be duped or completely check out of discourse per se, not limited to online social media. You hold the opposite position. Why?
It's technocratic hubris to think that there is just a single such arena and that all the others are illegitimate/dangerous.
Re: Humans aren’t mentally ready for an AI-saturated ‘post-truth world’
#194Re: Humans aren’t mentally ready for an AI-saturated ‘post-truth world’
#195That's what's happening with social media. Boomers cannot learn to live with it, we just have to wait another 30ish years. The same will happen with AI.
Re: Humans aren’t mentally ready for an AI-saturated ‘post-truth world’
#196Really don’t like the idea that we will act as interfaces for the AI, I honestly believe it will only many the majority of people lazier and dumber. I’m also incredibly shocked that no one is talking about AI as a friend/companion, that has to not be good for you in the long run. Humans need real human connection, AI is too artificial for that (duh). Having AI friends will be equivalent to consuming fast food instead…
Re: Humans aren’t mentally ready for an AI-saturated ‘post-truth world’
#197Each generation will be OK with the tools they grew up with. I think of my now-deceased grandparents. They had to be closely monitored to avoid falling for mail-in scams, of all things. They were old enough that mail was a trusted source of information in their upbringing. I like to think about what will tip us over, as technologists. Venturing into sci-fi a little, I think brain-computer interfaces are going to be i…
Rose-tinted glasses.
The scams we all know-and-love from our e-mail mailboxes today: romance-scams, advance-fee fraud, pyramid-schemes, and more, were all prevalent in the physical mail in decades past.
Re: Humans aren’t mentally ready for an AI-saturated ‘post-truth world’
#198This is a potentially sneaky way of getting around freedom of speech, by somehow arguing that if an idea is recycled by a language model it is suddenly OK to censor it, as long as you’re a few degrees of separation from the original blog.
What the heck else is post-truth supposed to mean??
Re: Humans aren’t mentally ready for an AI-saturated ‘post-truth world’
#199Earlier quoted context omitted.
Whew it's satire. Whew. I've literally seen posts on the internet that read like this sans the satire.
I've seen people on /r/singularity argue how LLMs are a better friend than actual friends or therapists because they are always available, non-judgemental and "listen better". EDIT: Here, for example: https://i.redd.it/7qxb1ohvhada1.png
Re: Humans aren’t mentally ready for an AI-saturated ‘post-truth world’
#200Really don’t like the idea that we will act as interfaces for the AI, I honestly believe it will only many the majority of people lazier and dumber. I’m also incredibly shocked that no one is talking about AI as a friend/companion, that has to not be good for you in the long run. Humans need real human connection, AI is too artificial for that (duh). Having AI friends will be equivalent to consuming fast food instead…
I honestly believe fast food and frozen food provided a lot of value to the society. Much more than the harm they did. So I'll take this as an optimistic view to AI.
Fast food ? I'd argue drawbacks heavily overshadow benefits of saving few minutes