youtube is quickly approaching feature parity with mid 2000s youtube. Same for Google maps and even Gmail.
YouTube: Sort by oldest is back baby
81–90 of 199 posts
Re: YouTube: Sort by oldest is back baby
#82Relevant tweet by YouTube CEO: https://twitter.com/nealmohan/status/1655999215515074561
Re: YouTube: Sort by oldest is back baby
#83Great. Can we get Amazon to have price sorting work too please? And have it actually accurately show cost per unit across similar products? I have to believe it's deliberately broken in both cases which is fucking annoying.
TIL...that Privacy Badger extension and uBlock Origin affect the "Sort by" options in Amazon! I have disabled both of them and got my results properly sorted by "Price: Low to High" while with both extensions on, it defaults to Featured!
Comparing to FF with both those extensions, the items and their order look identical (minus some ads)
Re: YouTube: Sort by oldest is back baby
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is false information, ublock origin doesn't affect 'Sort by' feature.
It does affect it, at least under Firefox; check your web developer tools. Here's a tiny portion of a massive error message: Error logged with the Track&Report JS errors API(http://tiny/1covqr6l8/wamazindeClieUserJava): {"m":"undefined Unknown error","name":"Error","csm":"v5 ueLogError stack","logLevel":"ERROR","attribution":"APE-safeframe","pageURL":"https://www.amazon.com/s?k=mastering+perl&s=price-asc-rank&ds=v1%3…
Re: YouTube: Sort by oldest is back baby
#85Now is behind the three dots drop-down menu, not as handy as before.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/feed/subscriptions (you must be logged in)
Re: YouTube: Sort by oldest is back baby
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
The problem with dislike counting is that the customers of Youtube (advertisers) do not want it, because they are spooked to have their ads associated with perceived negativity.
This is always the excuse thrown around. It just doesn't make a lot of sense. I'm not on Nike, Coke or mega-corp advertising level, but I do spend a lot with google's advertising apparatus, including on youtube-based adverts - not one time have I cared about how controversial or whatever a video might be. I simply want engagement from in-market potential customers... regardless of what content they're watching. Who a…
It's not an entirely unfair thing either. That is something that is happening, just in miniscule amounts. So YouTube introduced brand safety options which predict how safe a video is and avoids such potential headlines.
However since it's just an algorithm, it doesn't understand nuance. So now creators who are making educational content about tough subjects earn less money because they are bucketed as unsafe. Since unsafe content has less advertising biders, it earns less money.
Re: YouTube: Sort by oldest is back baby
#87Re: YouTube: Sort by oldest is back baby
#88Are you talking about the mobile native app? Because at least for me, on desktop web is still only Latest and Popular https://imgur.com/a/XBFvmen [1] [1] https://www.youtube.com/@theneedledrop/videos
Re: YouTube: Sort by oldest is back baby
#89youtube is quickly approaching feature parity with mid 2000s youtube. Same for Google maps and even Gmail.