Apple wants rights to the image of apples in Switzerland
1–10 of 191 posts
Re: Apple wants rights to the image of apples in Switzerland
#2[1] https://www.swissfruit.ch/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/sov_new...
Re: Apple wants rights to the image of apples in Switzerland
#3Was puzzling they didn't include an image of said logo[1]. IIRC I've observed this for some other articles in the past covering trademark disputes. Is there a common reason they might do this? [1] https://www.swissfruit.ch/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/sov_new...
Re: Apple wants rights to the image of apples in Switzerland
#4Was puzzling they didn't include an image of said logo[1]. IIRC I've observed this for some other articles in the past covering trademark disputes. Is there a common reason they might do this? [1] https://www.swissfruit.ch/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/sov_new...
Re: Apple wants rights to the image of apples in Switzerland
#5Was puzzling they didn't include an image of said logo[1]. IIRC I've observed this for some other articles in the past covering trademark disputes. Is there a common reason they might do this? [1] https://www.swissfruit.ch/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/sov_new...
Not protecting your trademarks can cause them to become "genericized". Wikipedia has a list of many that you've probably heard of and had no idea they were once trademarked.[0]
Some lawyer at Apple probably caught wind of this Swedish company and took action. It's really that simple.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_generic_and_genericize...
Re: Apple wants rights to the image of apples in Switzerland
#6What is Apple going to do next? Try to get a patent on rounded corners for rectangular electronic devices?
Re: Apple wants rights to the image of apples in Switzerland
#7The company NotCo got sued by the milk producers association for mis-using the word Leche (milk in Spanish) in their NotMilk product so it doesn’t use the word Milk
The milk producers won and the courts have ordered NotCo to change the name of their NotMilk product
Re: Apple wants rights to the image of apples in Switzerland
#8Re: Apple wants rights to the image of apples in Switzerland
#9Was puzzling they didn't include an image of said logo[1]. IIRC I've observed this for some other articles in the past covering trademark disputes. Is there a common reason they might do this? [1] https://www.swissfruit.ch/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/sov_new...
Trademarks, unlike copyright, are "use and protect it or lose it". There's no "expiry" date on them like copyrighted things have because brands sometimes live for over a hundred years. Letting someone take your companies name and logo just because you're "too old" isn't fair. This is because trademarks, unlike copyright, aren't about science and innovation; they're about preventing consumer confusion. Not protecting…
Re: Apple wants rights to the image of apples in Switzerland
#10> THE FRUIT UNION Suisse is 111 years old. For most of its history, it has had as its symbol a red apple with a white cross—the Swiss national flag superimposed on one of its most common fruits. But the group, the oldest and largest fruit farmer’s organization in Switzerland, worries it might have to change its logo, because Apple, the tech giant, is trying to gain intellectual property rights over depictions of appl…