Live data from Hacker News

Archaeologists find 3000-year-old sword, exceptionally well preserved

newsingermany.com

121–130 of 194 posts

Re: Archaeologists find 3000-year-old sword, exceptionally well preserved

#121
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This isn't a cookie banner. It's a full page blocking modal FFS. Way to conveniently argue past the point.

It's not on desktop, I just clicked it away in under a second although I don't read German. The point isn't all that special, is what I'm saying. The advertising on the underlying page is significantly worse.

It was definitely full page on desktop for me. Wayyyy way different from your typical cookie banner along the bottom.

Re: Archaeologists find 3000-year-old sword, exceptionally well preserved

#122

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I just spit my drink through my nose seeing that someone actually feels the need to defend cookie banners, lol. You have a fair point on how the inline ads themselves are trash, but I wouldn’t choose one over the other—I’d have neither of them.

I would prefer that cookies and tracking didn't exist, but given that they do I like having the option to opt out of them when I first visit a website.

I don't know about your experience (individual web footprints and all), but the banners I see mostly aren't really asking for permission. They're telling you that they use cookies, that by using their website you consent, and the "accept all" button just notes your consent and makes the banner go away. Not all sites with banners work this way, but it seems quite common to me.

Re: Archaeologists find 3000-year-old sword, exceptionally well preserved

#124
post #75
post #42

It blows my mind that these godawful cookie banners is where we ended up. Web devs, you clowns need get your shit together. No, the law doesn't require you to do this. Go back to the drawing board and do better.

It blows my mind that people still browse the web without an ad blocker. Install Firefox + uBlock and the problem goes away.

uBlock (at least uBlock Origin) doesn't block banners, at least not by default. Apparently you can adjust your filters to do so, but I didn't even know that was a thing until I looked into it just now.

Re: Archaeologists find 3000-year-old sword, exceptionally well preserved

#126
post #123

This is mindblowing. Here we are, 3000 years in the future. But how many of us could make such a “primitive” thing?

How many people could make them 3000 years ago? Im curious how many blacksmiths there were back then with the appropriate skill and resources to learn it and do it well. I feel as if there are still a surprising number of people that could make a sword today, although maybe not from raw resources.

Re: Archaeologists find 3000-year-old sword, exceptionally well preserved

#127
post #113

The article is somewhat sensationalistic. Finding an octagonal type bronze sword ("Achtkantschwert" in German) from that period is rare, but we have quite a couple of them. Since bronze does not rust, the conditions of such swords are often quite good (and typically far better than that of medieval iron swords, for instance). Here is a map of the distribution of octagonal-hilted swords in Europe: https://www.research…

My knowledge of bronze vs iron comes purely from playing dwarf fortress. Are they fairly comparable in the damage they can cause?

I've just started listening to the Fall of Civilizations podcast (https://fallofcivilizationspodcast.com/), and their second episode is on the Late Bronze Age collapse. The theory they put forward as to one of the reasons the big successful Bronze age civilizations got out-competed is that bronze is very expensive / hard to acquire, primarily because of the need for tin. (Copper is very common but unsuitable for weaponry without turning it into bronze.)

Iron is extremely common and cheap, but requires much much higher temperatures to work with than bronze. Once the furnace technology was out there to make smelting iron and creation of steel feasible, poorer / less complicated civilizations were able to make iron weaponry and go up against their richer neighbors.

Re: Archaeologists find 3000-year-old sword, exceptionally well preserved

#129
post #123

This is mindblowing. Here we are, 3000 years in the future. But how many of us could make such a “primitive” thing?

How many people could make them 3000 years ago? Im curious how many blacksmiths there were back then with the appropriate skill and resources to learn it and do it well. I feel as if there are still a surprising number of people that could make a sword today, although maybe not from raw resources.

it was one of the most popular and widespread occupations

Re: Archaeologists find 3000-year-old sword, exceptionally well preserved

#130
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That trope is about something so forgotten that any discoveries would be entirely unexpected. But awareness of Rome was never lost, quite the opposite. Even bureaucratic connections survived, they just shifted back a gear from political to spiritual authority. Most nominal titles like count or duke assumed by european nobility derive their names from some role in Roman administration, they all considered themselves a…

Came here to say much the same thing. A great book that gets into the details of this is https://www.amazon.com/Inheritance-Rome-Illuminating-Dark-40... TLDR; people considered themselves "Roman", or something adjacent to it, long after the western empire officially disintegrated, and of course in the east it didn't really die. Even on the outskirts (e.g. Romano-British) people held onto Roman, Christian, and Latin c…

Polish nobility, stretching well into today’s Ukraine, was inventing ways in which they were continuation of imaginary outskirts of said empire.
Post reply on HN