Live data from Hacker News

Archaeologists find 3000-year-old sword, exceptionally well preserved

newsingermany.com

91–100 of 194 posts

Re: Archaeologists find 3000-year-old sword, exceptionally well preserved

#91

>A man, a woman and a youth were buried in it. It is still unclear what relationship the people may have had to one another. Yeah, real puzzler that one

There may be a single, overwhelmingly likely option, but absent DNA testing or further context clues we can't know for sure. Let's not snark the one science journalist who isn't adding baseless speculation to their article.

Re: Archaeologists find 3000-year-old sword, exceptionally well preserved

#92

The shape, intricate detail, not something I would have expected from a civilization 3000 years ago. The more you know.

Well, the famous mask of Tutankhamun was dated to 1323 BCE. Plenty of older artefacts than 3000 years ago that are equally impressive.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mask_of_Tutankhamun

Re: Archaeologists find 3000-year-old sword, exceptionally well preserved

#93
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That trope is about something so forgotten that any discoveries would be entirely unexpected. But awareness of Rome was never lost, quite the opposite. Even bureaucratic connections survived, they just shifted back a gear from political to spiritual authority. Most nominal titles like count or duke assumed by european nobility derive their names from some role in Roman administration, they all considered themselves a…

Came here to say much the same thing. A great book that gets into the details of this is https://www.amazon.com/Inheritance-Rome-Illuminating-Dark-40... TLDR; people considered themselves "Roman", or something adjacent to it, long after the western empire officially disintegrated, and of course in the east it didn't really die. Even on the outskirts (e.g. Romano-British) people held onto Roman, Christian, and Latin c…

> Even on the outskirts (e.g. Romano-British) people held onto Roman, Christian, and Latin culture at a very deep level.

Three of the 10 most common languages on Earth boil down to "Latin with a bad accent".

Re: Archaeologists find 3000-year-old sword, exceptionally well preserved

#94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To be fair, the web developers are the ones actually typing in the code and deploying it. They must share at least partial blame. This whole "Don't blame me! Boss told me to do it" attitude is rampant in software.

Big agree with this sentiment, personal responsibility/dev mutiny/collective action could go a long way toward making the world less garbage.

yes individualism is the answer; collectivism is also the solution, everyone should do what they think is the morally correct thing and the whole garbage pile will suddenly go away, nobody will starve and Great Leaders will be no more. This has always worked in the past. Leadership be damned! I am important and smart enough to do the right thing!

Re: Archaeologists find 3000-year-old sword, exceptionally well preserved

#95

What stands out to me is the pommel with the large handhold. That makes me think that it's a slashing sword, not a stabbing one. Then there's the fact that it's all metal, unlike how most ancient and medieval swords which were made with an handle of organic material around the tang of the blade. Probably not intended (ever) for use in fighting? Since it doesn't have a replacable handle.

I was under the impression that bronze swords' lifespans were limited by the metal; they can't be sharpened, but would need to be re-cast. A replaceable handle probably wouldn't help much.

Wait, can you really not sharpen bronze? From what I know it takes a good edge, just not quite as fine as steel would. But I don't know anything about not being able to sharpen it.

Am I wrong? Can you really not sharpen bronze?

Re: Archaeologists find 3000-year-old sword, exceptionally well preserved

#96
post #42

It blows my mind that these godawful cookie banners is where we ended up. Web devs, you clowns need get your shit together. No, the law doesn't require you to do this. Go back to the drawing board and do better.

> Web devs, you clowns need get your shit together.

It’s not some hobby site you’re visiting and a web dev likely isn’t the decision maker…. and I doubt a web dev had much to do with the legislation for all these stupid banners.

Re: Archaeologists find 3000-year-old sword, exceptionally well preserved

#97
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agree with the sentiment, disagree with the assignment of blame. Blame legal, marketing, design, or PM. No web dev decided this was how they wanted to spend a day.

To be fair, the web developers are the ones actually typing in the code and deploying it. They must share at least partial blame. This whole "Don't blame me! Boss told me to do it" attitude is rampant in software.

Don’t hate the player hate the game

Re: Archaeologists find 3000-year-old sword, exceptionally well preserved

#98
post #42

It blows my mind that these godawful cookie banners is where we ended up. Web devs, you clowns need get your shit together. No, the law doesn't require you to do this. Go back to the drawing board and do better.

It's not the web devs that do it, they know what is adequate; as others said, it's legal, people who overthink these things.

I was once working on a website, we had everything fine, but then a committee of various people from various departments spent days coming up with everything that they thought the cookie banner should conform to.

And then the ad revenue people come in, and say that it should be easiest to just accept all. They quickly backtracked when the EU or France fined one of the big parties; suddenly, the (legally required) reject all button was back on all the cookie banners, which is a good example on how fining large companies large sums bubbles down quickly to smaller companies doing the same thing.

Re: Archaeologists find 3000-year-old sword, exceptionally well preserved

#99
post #42

It blows my mind that these godawful cookie banners is where we ended up. Web devs, you clowns need get your shit together. No, the law doesn't require you to do this. Go back to the drawing board and do better.

"Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—e.g. article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. They're too common to be interesting."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36341702.

Post reply on HN