Live data from Hacker News

BBEdit: Where Respect Is Due

apps.apple.com

81–90 of 177 posts

Re: BBEdit: Where Respect Is Due

#81
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Guessing they meant "I have never read" and not telling you to "never read"

I find myself writing like this all the time. I omit the 'I', writing it like I say it. Then I read back my own words and invariably insert the 'I' as I realise it doesn't make sense.

In this particular instance you'd have to disambiguate with "I have" or "I had", I alone would mean the wrong thing.

Re: BBEdit: Where Respect Is Due

#82
post #6

BBEdit was an essential component of not having to deal with the terrible editor & even worse runtime stability of CodeWarrior for a spell in a past life of mine. Thank you, BBEdit. Also, you’re low-key responsible for my lifelong unrealized quest to give my Linux workstation sane keyboard shortcuts.

> CodeWarrior Oh heck, you've just dredged up some absolutely horrific repressed memories of that pile of junk. It was impressive how unstable it was. It's funny too, these days I'm in embedded development again, and it's a markedly different experience to those days, though still amusingly unstable at times too.

Interesting. Do you remember which version (or approximate year) you're referring to?

I've recently been writing my first real app for Mac OS 9, using C++ (MacZoop framework) and Codewarrior Pro 5 on a G4. There's some features I miss from my modern developer environment (decent version control!), but other than that it's been a thoroughly enjoyable experience. Certainly I've had no stability issues at all with the IDE.

Re: BBEdit: Where Respect Is Due

#83

I moved to TextMate. I can't remember why. Is either of them better than the other these days? I feel like TextMate has been slightly abandoned.

Yeah, TextMate was great. I think it was the very intuitive way in which you could quickly extend it.

Find yourself typing this thing over and over? Just create a snippet, the interface is just very few clicks away.

Need a bit more power? Turn it into a command, and use whatever scripting language you’re comfortable with.

Want to change the color scheme? Here is a nice declarative way to select precisely the syntax elements you want.

(I think part of this was that they had a bunch of short videos on their site showing you how to do this, and then a well-written documentation to accompany it for the details.)

Sadly, with TextMate 2.0, the interface for these things got quite a bit clunkier, and then I left. (I also discovered my preference for modal editing.)

Re: BBEdit: Where Respect Is Due

#84
post #13

FTA: "We’ve always had the utmost respect for the user. Every internal decision about look and function answers the questions 'What does the customer need?' and 'How can we help them be more productive?' (Not 'How can we give them what they’re asking for?' because that isn’t the right question to answer.)" I experienced this first hand when asking Rich to restore the "hard wrap to window width" feature in TextWrangle…

I wish my company would adopt this philosophy. We seem to just add features when people ask for them, and it really starts to show after a while.

Re: BBEdit: Where Respect Is Due

#85
post #82
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> CodeWarrior Oh heck, you've just dredged up some absolutely horrific repressed memories of that pile of junk. It was impressive how unstable it was. It's funny too, these days I'm in embedded development again, and it's a markedly different experience to those days, though still amusingly unstable at times too.

Interesting. Do you remember which version (or approximate year) you're referring to? I've recently been writing my first real app for Mac OS 9, using C++ (MacZoop framework) and Codewarrior Pro 5 on a G4. There's some features I miss from my modern developer environment (decent version control!), but other than that it's been a thoroughly enjoyable experience. Certainly I've had no stability issues at all with the I…

2004-2005! Couldn't tell you the version though I'm afraid. I had nothing but issues with it, man it frustrated me haha. It's possible my memory has made the experience worse than it actually was however

Re: BBEdit: Where Respect Is Due

#87

I moved to TextMate. I can't remember why. Is either of them better than the other these days? I feel like TextMate has been slightly abandoned.

I still use TextMate. I don’t know whether development has slowed or stopped, but I haven’t had any issue recently. I find it less clunky and nicer than Sublime Text, which is my second choice and my escape route the day TextMate dies. It’d be a pain to convert all those bundles, though. TextMate’s support for esoteric language grammars is second to none and last time I checked some of mine depended on features not implemented in Sublime Text.

Re: BBEdit: Where Respect Is Due

#88
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

I'm somehat worried about the incidental harm caused by people relying on GPT's word chain hallucinations as facts for something critical. Most laypersons don't understand that GPT is not a factual search engine. I'm increasingly seeing people who should know better also forget this now and then.

the problem is that the quality of data on the web is such you can't really trust what you get from google either, so you need to go back to the pre-google days of using specialized search engines, or accept that some of what you get back is likely polluted and you don't have the resources to verify everything.

Re: BBEdit: Where Respect Is Due

#89
post #76
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No that’s just reality. If you give the user exactly what they asked for, you shipped a bad product.

No, that's just your caricature of reality. Reality depends entirely on the reality of what the users asked for and the product.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN