Live data from Hacker News

Fark redesign is now live (2007)

fark.com

221–230 of 475 posts

Re: Fark redesign is now live (2007)

#221
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reddit is relying heavily on the voluntary work of moderators. Without them and power users that indirectly curate the content of subreddits, the site is toast. Reddit is not dying by alienating its user base; it might be if they are alienating their power users.

They probably used all that nice volunteering work to train a moderation model by now.

That won't work, moderation is human-complete.

Re: Fark redesign is now live (2007)

#222
post #186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can see why they might want someone with the ability to edit posts (removing extreme TOS stuff - racism, hate speech etc). But that's probably not for the CEO and certainly shouldn't be used simply to "troll the trolls" Also it's baffling to me that the CEO of reddit is a regular user and somehow isn't up in arms about how irritating it is to use the site.

> (removing extreme TOS stuff - racism, hate speech etc) Why would you edit these? Deletion seems far superior, do you want people to go around editing out the racism of peoples posts? Seems absurd.

I'd personally hide or delete them. But I can see why someone might argue for this functionality, it's not totally absurd.

What's absurd is a CEO editing posts to troll people

Re: Fark redesign is now live (2007)

#223
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

at this point, there is only 1 way to save reddit, and it's so drastic that they wont do it because the ones who need to do it are too blind or too far away * fire spez * promise a clear committed roadmap of mod tools * promise to review 3rd party API pricing, and delay the current rollout It's literally the only way that will be accepted by the 1% that keep the site running (read the Ennui engine principle)

Or they can continue their failed attempts at using chatgpt to astroturf a counter-movement, lol: https://i.imgur.com/4e9jO7P.jpg Edit, some context: https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/146wn9s/commen... (spez / reddit ceo is a mod on r/programming, hence it still being up)

So does this means their astroturfing bot is open to prompt injection?

Re: Fark redesign is now live (2007)

#224
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

at this point, there is only 1 way to save reddit, and it's so drastic that they wont do it because the ones who need to do it are too blind or too far away * fire spez * promise a clear committed roadmap of mod tools * promise to review 3rd party API pricing, and delay the current rollout It's literally the only way that will be accepted by the 1% that keep the site running (read the Ennui engine principle)

Reddit won't die for the same reason Facebook won't... there's no real viable alternative for the majority of the users. It might become a bit shitter, it might lose a few users who are a bit more tech savvy or from the "old days of the internet" who'll find themselves fedi or forum based alternatives but the majority will keep getting what they want out of it without a reason to move - most users probably use the of…

There are alternatives. Lemmy has seen incredible growth over the past two weeks.

Re: Fark redesign is now live (2007)

#225

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> 2. The $10M buyout comments was a reasonable comment countering the statement that reddit loses $20M each year by users using Apollo. A comment which was a half-joke, as the audio recording shows clearly. In that case, buying Appolo for $10M would have been a steal and Reddit would have jumped on it. They didn't, their prior statement was probably a lie. If something loses me 20M$ per year and I have an option to b…

> If something loses me 20M$ per year and I have an option to buy it for 10M$ or kill it for 0$, I would choose the latter without much thinking. Weren’t the $20M reddit claimed they are losing, missed opportunity costs? I.e. if Apollo users wouldn‘t use Apollo but the official app, they would make that amount of money off of them. So buying that amount of revenue for $10M sounds definitely reasonable to me. If what…

Would those users continue using Apollo after Reddit bought it and filled it with ads or would they start to slowly drift away to other clients over time?

Re: Fark redesign is now live (2007)

#226
post #202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Don't forget the international dateline :) The 12th of June is a poorly specified target. But I know that /r/programming has two Reddit administrators as part of the mods, so I'm not surprised they're not going dark.

> But I know that /r/programming has two Reddit administrators as part of the mods, so I'm not surprised they're not going dark. Is there anything stopping Reddit from making the CEO a mod in every major sub though?

No but they still need mods. Otherwise the quality will quickly go so far downhill that no one wants to see use it anymore.

Re: Fark redesign is now live (2007)

#227
post #85
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Current ads at Reddit are not that bad, it is nothing like youtube which is borderline unwatchable at the moment. But for Reddit general there is like lot of astroturfing currently and if Reddit could start capturing some value from that and same time show for regular user that this is commercial/pr account would be win-win for Reddit and regular users.

I would bet money that Reddit has the highest percentage of ad blocking users. Either by way of browser extension or third party apps. They just don't have enough impressions to cover the outlandish costs associated with running the site. Combined with lax content moderation policies, advertisers see more value going with third parties that can push a viral story about a product to the homepage. There is no one probl…

> There is no one problem with Reddit, and that is the problem.

Actually there is one singular problem ... money.

They could accept that "reddit the product" is a 2-5bn market cap business with solid 0.5bn revenue; staff up on that basis, scale their infrastructure on that basis, M&A on that basis, set investor expectations on that basis.

Re: Fark redesign is now live (2007)

#228
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This implies that the website is really called fuck.com (but censored), which is certainly … a choice.

But wasn’t that obvious? Fark is a cleaner, sillier way of saying f*ck.

What the fark are you talking about? ;)

Re: Fark redesign is now live (2007)

#229

Just wondering. If you were Reddit CEO and you were being pressured to turn it into a profitable company, how would you do it?

Profitable for IPO for profitable to survive? It's way too late now but when Spez first came in, he had insane amounts of good will.

He should've been just honest and transparent with server costs and how much Reddit Gold and ads were bringing in. They used to have a Reddit gold target.

From there, they can slowly implement API charges to make a tiny profit so they don't just lose money there or implement Reddit Gold/Premium tiers that offer way better benefits.

Re: Fark redesign is now live (2007)

#230

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> spez / reddit ceo is a mod on r/programming How is it possible that these companies are still run like an immature dorm room shitshow? Are there no separation of duties? The CEO should not have admin access to anything (the very least for security purposes).

I guess you brought it right to the point: Reddit has never grown to a company it’s „dorm room shitshow“

Recently I read Reddit has over 2000 employees. I can’t begin to imagine what they possibly do.
Post reply on HN